Samsung771

Samsung771 — CS2 Stats

76561198183932174[U:1:223666446]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,558Tracked matches50%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,734 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. Today is the first observation — history builds from here and cannot be backfilled. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSamsung771FACEITLevel 10 · 2,734 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning63
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–45–2Last 10053%Win rateLWLLLLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +3.7pp headshot accuracy · −89ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 439ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 496ms

Last 20

  • 8–11–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 541ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility4.6
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels3.7
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 587ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning6.3
Utility4.6
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time606ms+1ms
first ⅓ avg 605ms → last ⅓ avg 606ms
Headshot accuracy23.0%+3.6%
first ⅓ avg 19.4% → last ⅓ avg 23.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–6 · cache, 16 Jul →
39%Best headshot accuracy · 12–9 · palacio, 17 Jan →
336msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · ancient, 31 Jul →
11–0Biggest win · palacio, 18 Jan →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
7–14In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

trainBest map · 80% over 5anubisWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientC259–1636%-0.01
infernoA1610–663%0.01
nukeA106–460%0.01
overpassS75–271%-0.00
anubisD62–433%-0.00
dust2D62–433%-0.01
trainS54–180%-0.02
vertigo—42–250%-0.01
palacio—43–175%0.04
mirage—44–0100%0.01
cache—22–0100%0.10
warden—20–20%-0.04
stronghold—21–150%0.01
golden—21–150%0.05
eldorado—10–10%0.02
alpine—10–10%0.00
italy—11–0100%-0.02
office—11–0100%-0.03
rooftop—10–10%-0.21

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,125Matches
53%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
83.0ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient25956%1.0716.6
Anubis15454%1.0717.3
Inferno13454%0.9915.8
Mirage9349%0.9915.3
Nuke8556%1.1116.8
Dust26941%0.9816.6
Overpass3845%1.0514.9
Train3566%1.2318.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.8%Headshot accuracy
34.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.8%Spray accuracy
74.8%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
587msReaction time
31.3%T opening success
48.6%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
8.3%Flash assists
10.98HE damage / grenade
7.56Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4939 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.3026% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient10–130.0416%6 Aug →
inferno16–130.0211%4 Aug →
ancient2–130.0019%31 Jul →
anubis13–16-0.0225%27 Jul →
dust210–130.0121%20 Jul →
anubis3–13-0.0726%17 Jul →
dust213–50.1027%17 Jul →
inferno16–130.0123%16 Jul →
cache13–90.0326%16 Jul →
anubis7–130.0422%16 Jul →
anubis13–80.0419%16 Jul →
cache13–60.1717%16 Jul →
eldorado7–90.0210%12 Jul →
nuke6–13-0.0613%10 Jun →
inferno17–19-0.0211%8 Jun →
vertigo12–12-0.0429%11 Mar →
ancient13–6-0.0218%3 Mar →
warden7–13-0.0426%31 Jan →
anubis11–130.0213%29 Jan →
stronghold13–90.0022%29 Jan →
alpine9–130.0022%23 Jan →
warden7–13-0.0528%22 Jan →
stronghold7–130.0128%22 Jan →
palacio11–00.0416%18 Jan →
palacio12–90.1039%17 Jan →
nuke13–5-0.0319%15 Jan →
italy13–8-0.0225%10 Jan →
golden12–120.0630%10 Jan →
anubis13–5-0.0029%6 Jan →
vertigo13–9-0.0531%6 Jan →
nuke13–90.0338%6 Jan →
ancient2–13-0.0426%17 Dec →
office13–5-0.0331%17 Dec →
vertigo13–80.0630%17 Dec →
train13–11-0.0720%15 Dec →
ancient10–13-0.0320%20 Nov →
ancient13–11-0.0225%17 Nov →
ancient13–90.0017%16 Nov →
inferno13–70.0218%16 Nov →
nuke8–13-0.0620%15 Nov →
train16–130.0121%15 Nov →
nuke13–70.0920%14 Nov →
ancient13–80.0617%14 Nov →
overpass14–16-0.0312%7 Nov →
palacio13–30.0728%3 Nov →
golden13–50.0321%3 Nov →
rooftop1–9-0.2110%2 Nov →
ancient13–9-0.0115%30 Oct →
vertigo3–9-0.0224%29 Oct →
inferno9–10.1738%29 Oct →
overpass13–80.0025%26 Oct →
nuke13–80.1516%24 Oct →
overpass13–100.0521%24 Oct →
overpass13–60.0723%23 Oct →
inferno13–90.0017%22 Oct →
ancient14–160.0019%17 Oct →
inferno16–13-0.0020%17 Oct →
ancient1–13-0.0711%17 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0513%16 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0220%11 Oct →
palacio13–11-0.0415%5 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0220%4 Oct →
ancient14–160.0518%3 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0413%3 Oct →
mirage13–50.0727%17 Sept →
inferno13–50.0925%17 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0616%16 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0413%16 Sept →
ancient13–90.0024%15 Sept →
overpass13–2-0.0224%15 Sept →
inferno13–50.1122%13 Sept →
dust219–15-0.0312%12 Sept →
ancient13–16-0.0219%12 Sept →
ancient13–20.0223%12 Sept →
nuke13–70.0219%11 Sept →
ancient0–13-0.1415%10 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0118%10 Sept →
inferno10–130.0114%10 Sept →
ancient13–60.0117%10 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0117%10 Sept →
nuke13–16-0.0123%8 Sept →
ancient11–130.0315%8 Sept →
ancient13–40.0715%8 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0829%5 Sept →
mirage13–110.0115%3 Sept →
overpass9–13-0.0013%3 Sept →
overpass13–4-0.0813%2 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0233%2 Sept →
train13–110.029%31 Aug →
train13–11-0.0223%29 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.0533%26 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0214%18 Aug →
train8–13-0.0421%18 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0127%31 Jul →
dust29–13-0.0613%31 Jul →
nuke19–16-0.0126%30 Jul →
ancient11–130.0317%28 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.0124%27 Jul →
inferno13–11-0.0320%27 Jul →
inferno13–7-0.0319%27 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →