majorhorscoc — CS2 Stats

FI76561198183173363[U:1:222907635]Steam profile ↗

1,002Tracked matches40%Win rate2024Tracked since

CSDB Rating3.6 Learning

Premier CS Rating15,774Purple band · top ~25.3% of ranked players (population est.)

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim34

Positioning43

Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46–53–1Last 10046%Win rateLLLLWWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim3.4

Aggression4.9

Utility6.3

Positioning4.3

Opening Duels0.5

Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.76 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 636ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 64% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.4

Positioning4.3

Utility6.3

Mechanics3.2

Opening Duels0.9

Win Impact1.7

Composite 3.6/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.03

Reaction time636ms−14ms

first ⅓ avg 650ms → last ⅓ avg 636ms

Headshot accuracy12.8%+1.6%

first ⅓ avg 11.1% → last ⅓ avg 12.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — mirage 13–9

13–0Biggest win — dust2

7Longest win streak

L4Current streak

8–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

7Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 80% over 5mirageWeakest map · 21% over 14

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
nuke	A	24	14–10	58%	-0.02
ancient	B	20	9–11	45%	-0.03
dust2	D	17	4–13	24%	-0.02
mirage	D	14	3–11	21%	-0.03
cache	B	12	6–6	50%	-0.01
inferno	S	8	6–2	75%	-0.02
anubis	S	5	4–1	80%	-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (21% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

98Matches

50%Win rate

0.90Avg K/D

73.9ADR

27%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win

18%1v2 clutch win

8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Nuke	21	67%	1.02	15.1
Ancient	16	56%	0.86	14.6
Dust2	15	40%	0.90	12.3
Inferno	9	56%	0.94	12.0
Mirage	7	57%	0.91	14.3
Anubis	7	43%	0.88	12.0
Overpass	2	100%	1.30	21.0
Cache	1	100%	0.90	9.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.9%Headshot accuracy

31.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

32.5%Spray accuracy

64.5%Counter-strafing

10.8°Preaim

636msReaction time

26.2%T opening success

37.5%CT opening success

0.76Enemies flashed / flash

4.9%Flash assists

9.29HE damage / grenade

8.96Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 12.8844% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 26.1607% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

21% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	3–13	-0.09	18%	26 Aug →
cache	8–13	0.05	13%	26 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.05	6%	26 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.01	13%	26 Aug →
inferno	16–12	-0.03	14%	25 Aug →
nuke	13–8	-0.02	13%	24 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.00	10%	24 Aug →
nuke	6–13	-0.00	12%	24 Aug →
ancient	1–13	-0.10	5%	24 Aug →
nuke	13–5	-0.11	10%	23 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.03	13%	23 Aug →
nuke	13–9	-0.02	3%	23 Aug →
inferno	13–11	-0.04	8%	20 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.06	20%	18 Aug →
nuke	14–16	-0.03	12%	16 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.01	12%	16 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.05	30%	16 Aug →
nuke	13–11	-0.04	12%	16 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.02	28%	16 Aug →
ancient	1–13	-0.08	14%	16 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.03	22%	16 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.04	7%	16 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.04	15%	16 Aug →
nuke	10–13	-0.07	18%	13 Aug →
nuke	13–11	-0.00	15%	6 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.03	9%	6 Aug →
ancient	5–13	-0.03	13%	6 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.01	10%	6 Aug →
ancient	13–9	-0.01	9%	6 Aug →
nuke	13–8	-0.03	11%	5 Aug →
anubis	13–10	-0.03	7%	5 Aug →
cache	13–5	-0.00	9%	5 Aug →
cache	16–13	-0.03	10%	5 Aug →
ancient	15–15	0.01	4%	5 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.04	10%	3 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.04	8%	3 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.02	21%	3 Aug →
inferno	13–3	0.05	9%	3 Aug →
nuke	4–13	-0.01	10%	2 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.05	15%	2 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.04	16%	2 Aug →
ancient	13–6	-0.01	13%	2 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.04	13%	2 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.06	0%	1 Aug →
inferno	13–11	-0.05	19%	1 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.04	5%	31 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.04	4%	31 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.04	9%	31 Jul →
cache	13–9	-0.01	23%	31 Jul →
mirage	13–8	-0.00	19%	31 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.04	21%	30 Jul →
nuke	10–13	-0.04	8%	30 Jul →
ancient	8–13	-0.00	22%	30 Jul →
anubis	13–9	-0.00	15%	30 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.03	14%	28 Jul →
nuke	14–16	-0.01	14%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.11	9%	25 Jul →
ancient	5–13	-0.08	17%	25 Jul →
nuke	16–13	0.02	14%	25 Jul →
nuke	14–16	-0.06	7%	20 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.05	17%	17 Jul →
ancient	13–6	-0.01	6%	17 Jul →
dust2	13–0	0.05	31%	17 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.02	15%	17 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.01	4%	17 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.02	16%	17 Jul →
ancient	13–10	-0.01	12%	16 Jul →
ancient	13–6	-0.06	15%	16 Jul →
anubis	7–13	-0.02	7%	16 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.02	6%	16 Jul →
cache	13–10	-0.05	10%	16 Jul →
nuke	13–3	0.00	13%	16 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.04	16%	16 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.08	19%	16 Jul →
nuke	5–13	0.02	7%	15 Jul →
cache	7–13	0.02	14%	15 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.09	9%	13 Jul →
cache	13–7	-0.05	13%	13 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.01	9%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.02	15%	13 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.00	17%	12 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.07	3%	12 Jul →
ancient	13–9	-0.02	6%	12 Jul →
nuke	13–9	-0.02	16%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–5	-0.00	11%	12 Jul →
ancient	13–4	-0.03	11%	12 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.00	11%	12 Jul →
nuke	13–2	-0.03	8%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.06	5%	12 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.02	11%	11 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.05	23%	11 Jul →
anubis	13–10	-0.01	15%	10 Jul →
ancient	7–13	-0.06	5%	10 Jul →
inferno	13–10	-0.06	10%	10 Jul →
nuke	13–10	-0.04	7%	10 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.04	10%	10 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.10	17%	3 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	6%	3 Jul →
nuke	13–3	0.10	21%	3 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.01	4%	3 Jul →