x1ka

x1ka — CS2 Stats

BA76561198182983702[U:1:222717974]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,243Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,507Hours in CS3Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating22,616Top 25% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#49056 of 261507 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 31 Oct 2026 (14 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 22,616 → 22,616
+3Tracked matches · now 1,243
0.0ppWin rate · 50.0% → 50.0%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,616 -1,765 10 Mar – 31 Oct · 37 days played
21,06124,717peak 24,71710 Mar31 Oct
24,856Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,675Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
50Days played since 2026-03-10

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,101 below peak (24,717)
  • +27 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,384 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-26
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-26

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate45.3%46.8%48.2%2.9% short
Shot accuracy15.8%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.081.061.07meets
Match win rate42.1%46.3%46.9%4.9% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGx1kaFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER22,616 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,675csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning56
Utility24

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–49–2Last 10049%Win rateLWWLWLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · −7.9pp headshot accuracy · −59ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 480ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 451ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 481ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility2.4
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels3.4
Clutch3.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning5.6
Utility2.4
Mechanics5.2
Opening Duels4.7
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time490ms−44ms
first ⅓ avg 534ms → last ⅓ avg 490ms
Headshot accuracy25.4%+2.5%
first ⅓ avg 22.9% → last ⅓ avg 25.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 13–3 · cache, 3 May →
67%Best headshot accuracy · 2–7 · mirage, 7 Oct →
313msFastest reaction time · 0–3 · mirage, 12 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · inferno, 8 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
6–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 59% over 34infernoWeakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A3420–1459%0.01
mirageC2812–1643%-0.00
infernoC114–736%0.03
cacheA95–456%0.02
nukeA74–357%-0.01
anubisB63–350%-0.01
ancient—20–20%-0.07
overpass—21–150%-0.01
office—10–10%0.13

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

157,964Lifetime kills
1.08K/D · Top 50% of Level 8 players
7,798Matches
42.1%Match win rate
45.3%Headshot %
15.8%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 8 players
17,994MVPs
3,169Hours (in match)
7,583Bombs planted
1,734Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AWP29,826
AK-4728,401
SSG 089,764
SG 5534,214
Knife3,484
P903,474

Lifetime map wins

24,345dust2
3,715train
3,688inferno
1,493nuke
728office
624vertigo
381cbble
155lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,122Matches
52%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
73.5ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage15361%1.0414.4
Dust25847%0.9814.2
Inferno3845%1.1415.4
Nuke3043%0.8212.6
Anubis2361%0.9614.2
Overpass2138%0.9514.1
Train1839%0.9714.7
Ancient1145%0.8614.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.8%Headshot accuracy
31.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.8%Spray accuracy
73.3%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
488msReaction time
42.0%T opening success
55.4%CT opening success
0.35Enemies flashed / flash
0.9%Flash assists
8.86HE damage / grenade
2.22Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3517 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke2–13-0.1122%25 Oct →
dust213–80.1225%25 Oct →
anubis13–40.0827%25 Oct →
office6–130.1315%23 Oct →
dust213–50.0422%23 Oct →
mirage1–13-0.0615%17 Oct →
dust214–16-0.0313%12 Oct →
inferno11–130.0220%8 Oct →
inferno13–20.0819%8 Oct →
dust210–130.0515%8 Oct →
mirage2–7-0.0767%7 Oct →
cache13–80.0415%6 Oct →
dust213–160.038%6 Oct →
mirage13–60.0430%6 Oct →
nuke13–100.0130%4 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0326%29 Sept →
inferno11–130.0821%29 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0227%27 Sept →
mirage13–90.0323%26 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.0425%23 Sept →
cache13–7-0.0128%23 Sept →
dust213–110.0534%22 Sept →
dust215–150.0537%20 Sept →
dust29–130.0625%19 Sept →
nuke13–110.0225%19 Sept →
inferno12–16-0.0129%18 Sept →
dust213–100.0129%18 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0418%17 Sept →
mirage15–15-0.0238%17 Sept →
inferno13–100.0936%17 Sept →
cache13–90.0441%14 Sept →
dust213–80.0217%14 Sept →
mirage13–90.0118%14 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0113%13 Sept →
mirage13–100.0948%12 Sept →
mirage0–30.000%12 Sept →
inferno5–130.0734%12 Sept →
dust213–80.0214%12 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0221%12 Sept →
dust213–6-0.0029%11 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0435%11 Sept →
inferno13–20.1017%11 Sept →
dust213–100.0225%11 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0434%10 Sept →
mirage11–130.0120%9 Sept →
dust213–90.0711%9 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0620%30 Aug →
dust213–2-0.1214%30 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0717%28 Aug →
dust27–130.0625%24 Aug →
dust213–70.0825%24 Aug →
anubis6–13-0.049%14 Aug →
mirage12–16-0.0626%14 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0313%3 Aug →
anubis13–11-0.0315%3 Aug →
nuke13–11-0.0331%2 Aug →
anubis13–70.0338%22 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0241%20 Jul →
dust213–100.0220%20 Jul →
mirage3–130.0126%20 Jul →
inferno13–16-0.0230%19 Jul →
mirage13–20.1450%19 Jul →
cache0–13-0.040%19 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.0335%17 Jul →
cache5–13-0.0614%16 Jul →
dust213–8-0.0215%16 Jul →
mirage6–13-0.0221%15 Jul →
mirage16–12-0.0025%15 Jul →
inferno11–13-0.0316%12 Jul →
mirage13–70.0027%12 Jul →
nuke16–130.0236%9 Jul →
dust28–130.0233%14 May →
overpass8–13-0.0118%14 May →
mirage5–13-0.099%14 May →
dust216–14-0.0317%9 May →
cache4–130.0216%5 May →
cache7–13-0.0721%3 May →
cache13–30.2440%3 May →
mirage10–13-0.0235%1 May →
dust213–11-0.0225%1 May →
cache13–7-0.0135%1 May →
nuke14–160.0327%25 Apr →
dust213–7-0.066%25 Apr →
mirage16–13-0.0124%25 Apr →
dust213–50.1040%11 Apr →
mirage13–70.0123%11 Apr →
dust27–130.0532%11 Apr →
ancient3–11-0.0610%11 Apr →
dust213–6-0.0326%3 Apr →
anubis4–13-0.0512%2 Apr →
dust27–13-0.0623%2 Apr →
mirage13–80.0323%29 Mar →
dust29–13-0.0520%29 Mar →
overpass13–3-0.007%15 Mar →
dust21–80.0215%14 Mar →
dust213–6-0.0323%14 Mar →
mirage8–13-0.0318%14 Mar →
dust213–100.1030%14 Mar →
mirage16–13-0.0122%10 Mar →
mirage13–80.0323%10 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.