nazZz

nazZz — CS2 Stats

GB76561198179455962[U:1:219190234]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,987Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,588 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Oct 2026 (12 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+6Tracked matches · now 3,987
+6.7ppWin rate · 53.3% → 60.0%

Rating over time

2,652Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
60Days played since 2025-07-25

Faceit ELO

  • 64 below peak (2,652)
  • Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 — 412 to go
  • Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is recorded after matches CSDB sees, so those points are days actually played — but only from the day tracking started: no feed exposes the ELO a past match ended on, so nothing before it can be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGnazZzFACEITLevel 10 · 2,588 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,652csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning56
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT58–42Last 10058%Win rateWWWWLWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +50pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −4.6pp headshot accuracy · −32ms reaction

Win rate up 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 499ms

Last 10

  • 8–2 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 519ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 535ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim8.8
Utility6.1
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels2.4
Clutch3.0

Sharp aimerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning5.6
Utility6.1
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time539ms−24ms
first ⅓ avg 563ms → last ⅓ avg 539ms
Headshot accuracy25.3%+1.9%
first ⅓ avg 23.3% → last ⅓ avg 25.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–4 · dust2, 18 Aug →
53%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · inferno, 3 Apr →
414msFastest reaction time · 13–2 · anubis, 16 Mar →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 30 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W4Current streak
5–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 81% over 26nukeWeakest map · 11% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientS2621–581%0.03
mirageB2311–1248%0.02
infernoC146–843%0.01
dust2S97–278%0.03
nukeD91–811%0.01
overpassC94–544%0.00
anubisS75–271%0.03
train—22–0100%0.04
cache—11–0100%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (11% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

4,736Matches
51%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
78.8ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient53055%1.2316.8
Mirage45452%1.2016.5
Anubis44452%1.1516.4
Inferno18848%1.1716.2
Nuke13945%1.1616.8
Dust211341%1.1517.9
Vertigo10955%1.1016.2
Overpass9147%1.1016.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.0%Headshot accuracy
37.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.9%Spray accuracy
82.3%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
538msReaction time
33.1%T opening success
37.1%CT opening success
0.71Enemies flashed / flash
5.1%Flash assists
9.53HE damage / grenade
8.47Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.1324% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

11% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust26–10.0440%27 Oct →
anubis13–70.0424%18 Oct →
ancient13–40.0530%12 Aug →
ancient13–80.0126%10 Aug →
mirage11–130.0221%6 Aug →
cache13–80.0724%26 Jul →
anubis5–130.0113%14 Jun →
mirage13–10-0.0417%10 Jun →
inferno13–100.0532%10 Jun →
ancient13–80.039%13 May →
inferno7–130.0125%13 May →
nuke3–13-0.0023%3 May →
inferno13–16-0.0248%25 Apr →
nuke16–130.0619%22 Apr →
anubis13–100.0214%22 Apr →
anubis9–130.0120%18 Apr →
anubis13–100.0729%13 Apr →
ancient10–130.0622%3 Apr →
inferno6–130.0453%3 Apr →
overpass11–130.1331%31 Mar →
inferno13–4-0.0432%31 Mar →
mirage13–70.0715%28 Mar →
mirage9–130.0133%28 Mar →
anubis13–20.1035%16 Mar →
overpass13–3-0.008%16 Mar →
ancient13–90.0536%15 Mar →
nuke8–130.0326%8 Mar →
mirage13–60.0322%8 Mar →
ancient13–50.1126%8 Mar →
inferno13–160.0129%17 Feb →
mirage9–13-0.0223%1 Feb →
ancient11–13-0.039%1 Feb →
ancient6–130.0620%24 Jan →
inferno6–13-0.0218%24 Jan →
ancient13–70.1212%13 Jan →
mirage10–130.0523%11 Jan →
dust228–250.0236%11 Jan →
anubis13–8-0.0221%11 Jan →
nuke8–13-0.0117%11 Jan →
train13–11-0.0119%8 Jan →
ancient13–30.0215%8 Jan →
nuke9–13-0.0012%7 Jan →
ancient13–90.0727%7 Jan →
ancient13–100.0621%6 Jan →
overpass4–13-0.0412%6 Jan →
mirage13–16-0.0220%5 Jan →
mirage3–13-0.0123%5 Jan →
mirage13–110.0319%5 Jan →
train13–40.0915%2 Jan →
mirage11–130.0629%30 Dec →
mirage13–70.0735%30 Dec →
inferno3–13-0.0414%29 Dec →
mirage13–90.0423%28 Dec →
mirage10–13-0.0621%27 Dec →
inferno16–14-0.0111%27 Dec →
inferno8–130.0422%23 Dec →
mirage16–140.0824%23 Dec →
ancient16–130.0214%23 Dec →
mirage6–130.0820%23 Dec →
dust27–13-0.0219%23 Dec →
ancient7–13-0.0219%23 Dec →
ancient13–90.0325%23 Dec →
mirage13–100.0216%23 Dec →
mirage9–13-0.0422%20 Dec →
ancient13–100.0011%20 Dec →
ancient13–100.0116%19 Dec →
mirage11–13-0.0026%16 Dec →
ancient13–90.0813%16 Dec →
ancient13–40.0719%5 Nov →
ancient13–2-0.0115%31 Oct →
mirage13–10.0730%30 Oct →
mirage16–140.0123%29 Oct →
overpass6–13-0.0717%28 Oct →
inferno13–40.0026%11 Oct →
dust213–5-0.0434%17 Sept →
inferno13–40.0916%12 Sept →
nuke14–16-0.0015%31 Aug →
overpass10–130.0019%31 Aug →
dust29–130.0437%31 Aug →
dust216–120.0227%28 Aug →
mirage1–13-0.0236%28 Aug →
overpass13–8-0.0410%26 Aug →
overpass13–50.0924%26 Aug →
ancient13–40.0731%26 Aug →
inferno13–30.0819%25 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0219%25 Aug →
dust213–100.0429%24 Aug →
dust213–100.0626%23 Aug →
ancient13–100.0320%23 Aug →
mirage13–100.0527%20 Aug →
overpass11–13-0.0433%19 Aug →
dust213–40.1413%18 Aug →
nuke8–130.0013%18 Aug →
ancient13–90.0236%17 Aug →
nuke3–13-0.0031%17 Aug →
overpass13–8-0.0322%16 Aug →
inferno14–16-0.0119%28 Jul →
ancient5–130.0029%27 Jul →
ancient13–30.0328%27 Jul →
ancient13–5-0.0914%25 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.