xfl0ud

xfl0ud — CS2 Stats

PROFUT EsportsTurkeyRiflerSettings & gear profile →

TR76561198178209109[U:1:217943381]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,609Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongPositional Player
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 26 Sep 2026 (11 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 3,607 → 3,607
+1Tracked matches · now 2,609
0.0ppWin rate · 53.3% → 53.3%

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 3,607 +0 29 Aug – 26 Sept · 12 observations
3,6073,607peak 3,60729 Aug26 Sept
3,607Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
44Days played since 2026-03-05

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 3,607
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: 4,000 ELO at 4,000 — 393 to go
  • Reached: 3,500 ELO · 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO · Level 10
  • 3,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-29
  • 3,000 ELO first seen 2026-08-29

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGxfl0ud30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO3,607csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning63
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–47Last 10053%Win rateLLWWWLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +1.0pp headshot accuracy · −31ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 464ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 434ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 449ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim8.9
Utility5.3
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels4.2
Clutch3.8

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 98% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 11.1° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning6.3
Utility5.3
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels3.5
Win Impact6.1

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time468ms−52ms
first ⅓ avg 519ms → last ⅓ avg 468ms
Headshot accuracy23.1%+0.8%
first ⅓ avg 22.2% → last ⅓ avg 23.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.25Best match rating · 13–3 · vertigo, 9 Apr →
41%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · ancient, 23 Jul →
289msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · inferno, 12 May →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 28 Mar →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
6–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 62% over 21infernoWeakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2613–1350%0.01
mirageA2113–862%-0.01
nukeC167–944%0.00
ancientA148–657%0.01
infernoC114–736%0.00
overpassA53–260%-0.01
anubis—42–250%0.01
vertigo—22–0100%0.16
cache—11–0100%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

4,296Matches
60%Win rate
1.29Avg K/D
91.5ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
32Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage33053%1.1617.1
Ancient24452%1.1816.8
Anubis18860%1.1317.6
Dust214459%1.1818.3
Nuke13461%1.1717.5
Vertigo6670%1.3717.7
Overpass4351%1.0716.4
Inferno2241%1.0215.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Inventory

$7,729Inventory value400ItemsFull inventory breakdown →
★ Butterfly Knife | Slaughter (Factory New)$1,771M4A4 | Hellfire (Factory New)$661AWP | CMYK (Minimal Wear)$491★ Flip Knife | Slaughter (Factory New)$461M4A1-S | Fade (Factory New)$326M4A1-S | Fade (Factory New)$326

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.9%Headshot accuracy
38.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.6%Spray accuracy
80.1%Counter-strafing
11.1°Preaim
458msReaction time
35.9%T opening success
51.8%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
6.4%Flash assists
7.23HE damage / grenade
10.68Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.8539% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis7–13-0.0226%31 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0628%31 Aug →
mirage13–9-0.0512%30 Aug →
nuke13–6-0.0232%30 Aug →
ancient13–70.0116%29 Aug →
dust210–130.0517%29 Aug →
anubis13–30.0719%29 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0129%27 Aug →
dust211–130.0331%27 Aug →
cache13–100.0624%23 Aug →
ancient14–16-0.039%23 Aug →
anubis13–16-0.0415%23 Aug →
nuke5–13-0.0726%23 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0025%22 Aug →
dust216–13-0.0315%22 Aug →
nuke6–130.0226%22 Aug →
dust216–130.0430%21 Aug →
ancient13–50.0526%21 Aug →
mirage13–8-0.0429%19 Aug →
ancient9–130.0023%19 Aug →
anubis13–70.018%19 Aug →
ancient16–12-0.0229%16 Aug →
ancient13–60.0421%14 Aug →
mirage13–110.0127%14 Aug →
nuke12–160.0621%14 Aug →
mirage13–100.0030%12 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0324%26 Jul →
dust211–13-0.0221%26 Jul →
ancient13–30.1141%23 Jul →
dust26–13-0.0316%23 Jul →
mirage13–80.0419%23 Jul →
dust211–130.0526%12 Jul →
nuke13–80.1222%4 Jul →
nuke5–13-0.0330%4 Jun →
inferno11–13-0.0821%4 Jun →
dust213–5-0.0630%3 Jun →
inferno13–6-0.0319%3 Jun →
dust211–13-0.0122%2 Jun →
nuke10–130.0418%2 Jun →
dust211–13-0.0112%28 May →
overpass16–120.0118%28 May →
mirage9–130.0029%27 May →
nuke7–13-0.0328%27 May →
mirage8–13-0.0510%12 May →
inferno6–13-0.0514%12 May →
dust213–40.0019%12 May →
inferno4–13-0.0324%11 May →
mirage6–13-0.0218%11 May →
inferno7–13-0.0418%10 May →
mirage4–13-0.0715%10 May →
dust213–110.0521%9 May →
nuke13–80.0322%9 May →
dust29–13-0.0317%26 Apr →
inferno13–50.0913%26 Apr →
ancient10–130.0029%26 Apr →
nuke0–13-0.0824%26 Apr →
nuke13–9-0.0122%25 Apr →
dust214–16-0.0223%25 Apr →
mirage13–80.0126%25 Apr →
overpass13–70.0413%24 Apr →
dust213–9-0.0211%24 Apr →
ancient9–13-0.0123%15 Apr →
dust213–40.1236%9 Apr →
vertigo13–30.2535%9 Apr →
vertigo13–50.0825%9 Apr →
ancient13–9-0.0226%3 Apr →
dust211–13-0.0120%3 Apr →
nuke7–130.0123%3 Apr →
nuke16–14-0.0118%3 Apr →
mirage13–70.0122%3 Apr →
nuke13–40.0914%2 Apr →
mirage13–7-0.0123%2 Apr →
overpass7–13-0.0514%1 Apr →
mirage13–80.0720%1 Apr →
dust27–13-0.0133%1 Apr →
inferno14–16-0.0230%30 Mar →
mirage10–130.0224%30 Mar →
dust213–90.0020%30 Mar →
inferno13–10.0436%28 Mar →
mirage13–4-0.006%28 Mar →
dust213–60.0528%28 Mar →
overpass11–13-0.0022%25 Mar →
mirage16–14-0.0224%21 Mar →
inferno13–90.1523%18 Mar →
mirage13–50.1231%14 Mar →
dust213–40.1321%14 Mar →
mirage13–110.0419%10 Mar →
nuke13–40.0228%9 Mar →
dust22–10-0.0632%8 Mar →
inferno9–130.0323%8 Mar →
dust26–30.0011%8 Mar →
overpass13–3-0.0424%8 Mar →
mirage1–8-0.0818%7 Mar →
ancient13–50.1122%7 Mar →
nuke3–13-0.0824%7 Mar →
mirage2–6-0.0320%7 Mar →
dust213–9-0.0328%6 Mar →
mirage8–13-0.0715%6 Mar →
inferno3–13-0.0517%6 Mar →
dust213–60.1020%5 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

3K ELO Club1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.