Anders

Anders — CS2 Stats

76561198176053789[U:1:215788061]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,800Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating21,973Top 50% of 190,010 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#52338 of 237741 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,863 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Sep 2026 (8 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 61 days played since 17 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,973 -145 19 Feb14 Sept · 13 days played
21,24822,643peak 22,64319 Feb14 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,863 +0 1 Sept8 Sept · 2 observations
1,8631,863peak 1,8631 Sept8 Sept
22,862Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,863Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
61Days played since 2026-02-17

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,863
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 138 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 670 below peak (22,643)
  • +378 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 3,027 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAndersFACEITLevel 8 · 1,863 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER21,973 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,863csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning56
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45505Last 10045%Win rateWLWWWLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · −2.4pp headshot accuracy · −35ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 498ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 517ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 535ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim7.3
Utility5.3
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels4.5
Clutch2.6

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 65% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 65% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 560ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning5.6
Utility5.3
Mechanics5.3
Opening Duels4.4
Win Impact2.1

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time562ms−71ms
first ⅓ avg 633ms → last ⅓ avg 562ms
Headshot accuracy21.8%−2.0%
first ⅓ avg 23.7% → last ⅓ avg 21.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–10 · nuke, 4 Jul
39%Best headshot accuracy · 16–13 · cache, 27 Jul
359msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · inferno, 30 Jun
13–2Biggest win · inferno, 11 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
105In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 56% over 25anubisWeakest map · 23% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA25141156%-0.02
nukeA169756%0.01
cacheB147750%-0.01
anubisD1331023%-0.01
mirageB115645%-0.02
ancientD93633%-0.01
overpassD72529%-0.00
dust221150%-0.06
vertigo110100%0.01
stronghold1010%-0.01
train1010%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (23% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,454Matches
50%Win rate
0.96Avg K/D
66.7ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
13%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno23658%0.9114.3
Nuke21860%0.8413.3
Anubis17044%0.7813.1
Ancient15341%0.8313.9
Dust25531%0.6711.9
Train4137%0.6711.4
Mirage3135%0.7312.3
Overpass2752%0.9116.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.1%Headshot accuracy
35.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.2%Spray accuracy
74.0%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
560msReaction time
24.1%T opening success
65.4%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
9.2%Flash assists
10.84HE damage / grenade
4.40Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.0786% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

23% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–50.0132%14 Sept
ancient11–130.0019%14 Sept
cache13–11-0.0323%5 Sept
cache13–4-0.0524%28 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0222%27 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0910%26 Aug
inferno1–9-0.2231%23 Aug
inferno7–13-0.068%21 Aug
dust211–13-0.0321%16 Aug
overpass7–130.0923%15 Aug
ancient16–19-0.0123%14 Aug
vertigo16–130.0122%14 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0322%14 Aug
cache10–13-0.0529%11 Aug
nuke13–90.0230%10 Aug
nuke19–17-0.0430%7 Aug
cache3–130.0026%31 Jul
nuke13–100.0624%31 Jul
mirage8–130.0015%31 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0114%31 Jul
anubis15–150.0020%30 Jul
cache8–13-0.0528%30 Jul
anubis5–130.0021%30 Jul
ancient4–13-0.1017%27 Jul
cache16–13-0.0639%27 Jul
nuke16–140.0721%27 Jul
mirage13–50.0224%27 Jul
ancient13–110.0318%27 Jul
cache9–130.0612%27 Jul
cache6–130.0118%26 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0215%26 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0619%26 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0319%25 Jul
anubis11–130.0517%25 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0023%24 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0526%24 Jul
inferno13–110.0326%20 Jul
inferno1–13-0.1025%20 Jul
anubis13–5-0.0727%19 Jul
anubis13–16-0.0533%19 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0615%18 Jul
inferno13–70.0424%18 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0131%8 Jul
dust213–7-0.0820%8 Jul
overpass13–110.0928%4 Jul
inferno13–90.0429%4 Jul
nuke13–100.1217%4 Jul
mirage0–13-0.0736%3 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0238%2 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0423%2 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0017%2 Jul
cache11–13-0.0127%1 Jul
nuke15–15-0.0222%30 Jun
ancient13–100.0417%30 Jun
inferno3–13-0.110%30 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0221%29 Jun
anubis6–130.0310%25 Jun
overpass12–12-0.0117%13 Jun
stronghold8–13-0.0131%13 Jun
inferno13–20.0621%11 Jun
inferno19–17-0.0318%7 Jun
nuke13–110.0025%7 Jun
cache16–130.0323%7 Jun
inferno8–130.0725%29 May
inferno13–60.0218%25 May
ancient10–13-0.0314%25 May
inferno13–7-0.0317%17 May
overpass2–13-0.0935%15 May
anubis7–130.0427%14 May
cache13–90.0723%12 May
train2–130.0133%12 May
cache13–20.0727%10 May
cache2–13-0.0710%6 May
inferno13–40.0337%6 May
cache13–8-0.0234%29 Apr
overpass7–13-0.0529%25 Apr
inferno13–6-0.0023%24 Apr
inferno13–7-0.0222%21 Apr
anubis9–13-0.0618%20 Apr
nuke13–90.0720%18 Apr
anubis10–13-0.0019%12 Apr
nuke12–12-0.0326%10 Apr
inferno13–9-0.059%10 Apr
inferno13–8-0.0126%8 Apr
inferno5–13-0.0513%3 Apr
inferno9–13-0.0419%3 Apr
anubis12–120.0121%3 Apr
anubis13–60.0126%28 Mar
ancient13–100.0027%22 Mar
nuke13–70.0038%21 Mar
overpass2–130.0115%17 Mar
nuke13–40.0835%10 Mar
inferno13–70.0622%8 Mar
mirage13–100.0728%8 Mar
inferno11–13-0.0014%28 Feb
nuke8–130.0124%28 Feb
anubis13–110.0214%28 Feb
mirage3–13-0.0833%24 Feb
overpass13–6-0.0518%19 Feb
nuke7–13-0.0618%17 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →