QzengTv

QzengTv — CS2 Stats

DE76561198175970714[U:1:215704986]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

673Tracked matches70%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating15,015Purple band · top ~28.3% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,015 +15 5 Jul – 30 Sept · 27 days played
10,93615,015peak 15,0155 Jul30 Sept
15,115Peak Premier in tracked matches
45Days played since 2026-07-05

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 15,015
  • +3,769 over 30 days · improving
  • +15 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 4,985 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGQzengTvFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER15,015 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning52
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT51–48–1Last 10051%Win rateLWWWWWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +1.2pp headshot accuracy · −67ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 517ms

Last 10

  • 8–2 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 516ms

Last 20

  • 15–5 · 75% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 549ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim6.8
Utility5.6
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch4.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 556ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning5.2
Utility5.6
Mechanics4.2
Opening Duels3.5
Win Impact10.0

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time569ms−87ms
first ⅓ avg 657ms → last ⅓ avg 569ms
Headshot accuracy15.6%+1.8%
first ⅓ avg 13.8% → last ⅓ avg 15.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–5 · mirage, 17 Jul →
30%Best headshot accuracy · 5–9 · inferno, 26 Aug →
422msFastest reaction time · 16–14 · anubis, 27 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 29 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
11–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 70% over 10ancientWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A3017–1357%0.00
anubisB158–753%-0.02
nukeB137–654%-0.01
cacheC135–838%-0.00
ancientD124–833%0.00
infernoS107–370%0.02
mirageC52–340%0.03
debris—11–0100%0.01
vertigo—10–10%-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

81Matches
51%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
79.5ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
30%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust23060%1.1214.9
Inferno1362%1.2820.5
Ancient1250%1.1715.4
Anubis1040%0.9715.2
Cache838%0.8611.5
Mirage520%0.7312.8
Nuke250%0.8614.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.5%Headshot accuracy
38.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.4%Spray accuracy
69.1%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
556msReaction time
44.5%T opening success
43.2%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
3.9%Flash assists
8.25HE damage / grenade
6.74Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis8–13-0.0614%30 Sept →
nuke13–40.0530%30 Sept →
nuke13–110.0218%30 Sept →
anubis13–70.027%29 Sept →
dust213–110.0227%29 Sept →
anubis13–50.0710%29 Sept →
dust213–100.0313%28 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0510%28 Sept →
anubis16–14-0.0119%27 Sept →
nuke10–130.0219%27 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0620%26 Sept →
dust213–50.0416%26 Sept →
dust213–80.0420%25 Sept →
nuke10–130.0020%25 Sept →
anubis13–3-0.0110%25 Sept →
inferno13–70.0110%25 Sept →
inferno13–100.0310%25 Sept →
dust213–60.0423%24 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.046%23 Sept →
anubis13–40.0220%23 Sept →
ancient11–130.0216%22 Sept →
cache13–90.0510%21 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0315%21 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.027%20 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0117%26 Aug →
inferno5–9-0.0330%26 Aug →
cache13–90.0512%25 Aug →
ancient16–130.0217%25 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.0117%25 Aug →
mirage13–70.0421%23 Aug →
dust213–110.0512%22 Aug →
cache5–13-0.0610%22 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0311%21 Aug →
inferno13–110.0617%21 Aug →
dust210–130.049%19 Aug →
dust23–13-0.0813%19 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.011%18 Aug →
mirage7–130.0514%15 Aug →
dust213–100.0212%15 Aug →
cache4–13-0.0412%15 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0225%14 Aug →
ancient13–40.0616%9 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0113%9 Aug →
inferno13–80.0714%8 Aug →
dust22–13-0.0730%8 Aug →
cache13–7-0.0022%8 Aug →
cache2–13-0.0216%7 Aug →
ancient0–13-0.0317%3 Aug →
dust213–4-0.0110%29 Jul →
dust213–1-0.0228%29 Jul →
dust213–100.0326%29 Jul →
inferno8–8-0.0613%27 Jul →
dust211–13-0.0019%27 Jul →
anubis10–130.0212%26 Jul →
inferno14–160.0419%25 Jul →
nuke13–90.0519%25 Jul →
dust213–70.0714%24 Jul →
nuke16–140.0526%24 Jul →
anubis4–13-0.094%23 Jul →
cache9–13-0.0322%23 Jul →
dust24–13-0.0515%22 Jul →
ancient6–13-0.066%22 Jul →
nuke9–7-0.1216%22 Jul →
ancient13–50.067%21 Jul →
cache13–7-0.018%21 Jul →
cache13–60.0519%21 Jul →
debris9–70.0115%21 Jul →
inferno16–130.0413%20 Jul →
cache6–13-0.0615%20 Jul →
nuke2–13-0.0219%19 Jul →
dust210–130.039%18 Jul →
anubis10–13-0.038%18 Jul →
dust22–13-0.0612%18 Jul →
mirage13–50.0916%17 Jul →
dust213–110.0319%17 Jul →
cache8–13-0.0218%16 Jul →
nuke9–6-0.109%16 Jul →
anubis8–13-0.0412%15 Jul →
dust26–13-0.0514%15 Jul →
anubis9–130.019%15 Jul →
cache8–13-0.0220%14 Jul →
dust213–100.0110%14 Jul →
dust213–60.0824%14 Jul →
anubis13–80.049%13 Jul →
anubis13–11-0.0917%13 Jul →
ancient8–13-0.0519%12 Jul →
dust22–13-0.073%12 Jul →
ancient9–130.0012%12 Jul →
dust213–4-0.029%12 Jul →
cache11–130.0824%12 Jul →
ancient6–13-0.039%10 Jul →
dust29–1-0.0413%10 Jul →
inferno13–100.0010%9 Jul →
inferno9–40.0021%9 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.018%9 Jul →
dust210–130.0514%8 Jul →
nuke13–80.0528%8 Jul →
ancient13–40.0912%8 Jul →
vertigo5–9-0.0810%8 Jul →
anubis1–13-0.049%5 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.