Toope

Toope — CS2 Stats

FI76561198175647253[U:1:215381525]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,130Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating24,467Top 25% of 190,010 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#25967 of 236026 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,025 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 21 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 34 days played since 3 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,467 -327 11 Jun21 Sept · 12 days played
22,97924,844peak 24,84411 Jun21 Sept
Faceit ELO: 2,025 +0 1 Sept2 Sept · 2 observations
2,0252,025peak 2,0251 Sept2 Sept
24,967Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,025Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
34Days played since 2026-06-03

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,025
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 475 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 377 below peak (24,844)
  • +349 over 30 days · steady
  • -327 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 533 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGToopeFACEITLevel 10 · 2,025 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER24,467 · Pink bandPEAK ELO2,025csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning46
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46522Last 10046%Win rateWWWLWWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −1.1pp headshot accuracy · −15ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 521ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 492ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 500ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility5.7
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels1.3
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning4.6
Utility5.7
Mechanics5.2
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time497ms−68ms
first ⅓ avg 565ms → last ⅓ avg 497ms
Headshot accuracy17.9%−1.1%
first ⅓ avg 19.0% → last ⅓ avg 17.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 11–13 · nuke, 20 Jul
62%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · dust2, 6 Jul
367msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · ancient, 11 Jun
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 12 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W3Current streak
86In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 56% over 27anubisWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A27151256%-0.01
mirageB21101148%-0.00
ancientB105550%-0.00
cacheD93633%-0.02
anubisD82625%-0.03
infernoC73443%-0.03
nukeD72529%0.00
trainC52340%-0.02
vertigo43175%-0.01
office1010%-0.08
overpass110100%0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

936Matches
53%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
74.0ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
13%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage20247%1.0014.8
Dust29554%1.0014.5
Nuke8553%0.9614.2
Anubis6050%1.0315.0
Ancient4852%0.9214.8
Inferno3453%0.7912.7
Vertigo2744%1.0416.6
Overpass1656%0.8612.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.8%Headshot accuracy
35.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.6%Spray accuracy
73.4%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
490msReaction time
46.7%T opening success
31.9%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
4.5%Flash assists
9.47HE damage / grenade
11.85Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 31.8908% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–110.0219%21 Sept
mirage13–9-0.0020%21 Sept
dust213–4-0.0311%21 Sept
mirage0–13-0.110%21 Sept
dust213–90.0220%20 Sept
inferno13–11-0.0324%17 Sept
mirage16–130.0221%17 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0122%17 Sept
anubis5–13-0.0314%16 Sept
nuke7–130.0421%16 Sept
mirage11–130.0620%16 Sept
inferno6–13-0.0619%11 Sept
dust213–110.0124%11 Sept
anubis5–13-0.1013%11 Sept
mirage4–13-0.038%11 Sept
dust213–4-0.0026%11 Sept
mirage13–110.0112%11 Sept
inferno14–16-0.0318%11 Sept
nuke10–13-0.0118%11 Sept
cache13–110.0326%11 Sept
vertigo13–40.0623%11 Sept
ancient19–15-0.0020%10 Sept
cache7–13-0.0817%10 Sept
nuke13–4-0.0219%10 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0121%5 Sept
ancient13–160.0113%5 Sept
nuke13–6-0.0614%5 Sept
ancient13–10-0.0116%5 Sept
mirage13–70.0015%5 Sept
dust27–130.0010%5 Sept
ancient13–16-0.0322%3 Sept
dust213–80.0127%3 Sept
mirage13–30.0318%3 Sept
office10–13-0.0820%2 Sept
mirage3–13-0.079%31 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0314%28 Aug
ancient9–130.0113%27 Aug
cache13–16-0.0325%27 Aug
dust29–130.0124%27 Aug
cache13–9-0.049%26 Aug
cache4–13-0.0937%26 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0013%19 Aug
dust213–10.0422%16 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0517%15 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0514%15 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0611%15 Aug
cache5–13-0.0226%14 Aug
train12–12-0.0221%14 Aug
train13–8-0.0410%14 Aug
dust26–13-0.0625%12 Aug
dust213–0-0.0717%12 Aug
dust213–7-0.0722%12 Aug
mirage1–4-0.0329%12 Aug
train0–13-0.0533%12 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0617%12 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0417%12 Aug
train13–9-0.0123%12 Aug
mirage13–90.0828%11 Aug
dust213–7-0.0716%11 Aug
mirage13–90.0213%22 Jul
dust213–30.0919%22 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0218%22 Jul
anubis0–13-0.0517%22 Jul
nuke11–130.1426%20 Jul
anubis13–50.0114%20 Jul
dust213–90.0223%20 Jul
mirage13–40.0924%20 Jul
dust213–160.0423%16 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0422%16 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0113%16 Jul
anubis13–90.0511%16 Jul
dust214–16-0.0121%13 Jul
dust21–13-0.100%13 Jul
cache13–110.0421%13 Jul
cache12–16-0.0325%6 Jul
dust26–130.0328%6 Jul
cache10–130.0222%6 Jul
dust27–13-0.0462%6 Jul
ancient8–1-0.0129%5 Jul
dust213–10-0.0310%5 Jul
dust216–14-0.0214%4 Jul
mirage13–70.0511%4 Jul
mirage13–40.034%4 Jul
inferno9–13-0.087%4 Jul
inferno5–130.0224%3 Jul
dust27–13-0.0328%3 Jul
anubis8–130.0115%3 Jul
dust29–13-0.0717%3 Jul
dust29–130.0131%26 Jun
anubis11–13-0.0918%25 Jun
train12–120.0217%25 Jun
dust213–60.0313%12 Jun
dust213–11-0.0018%11 Jun
ancient7–130.0227%11 Jun
overpass13–10.0920%11 Jun
ancient11–130.0218%6 Jun
dust28–13-0.0518%5 Jun
vertigo13–5-0.0719%3 Jun
vertigo0–13-0.060%3 Jun
vertigo13–10.0123%3 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →