Schwiiif

Schwiiif — CS2 Stats

DE76561198174720205[U:1:214454477]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

440Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating12,652Blue band · top ~40.8% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Oct 2026 (16 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 12,652 -528 1 Sept – 15 Oct · 19 days played
12,09414,620peak 14,6201 Sept15 Oct
14,989Peak Premier in tracked matches
23Days played since 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,968 below peak (14,620)
  • -561 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 2,348 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-11
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-11

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSchwiiifFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER12,652 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning39
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD41–54–5Last 10041%Win rateLLLWTLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −50pp win rate · −0.06 avg rating · +1.9pp headshot accuracy · −9ms reaction

Win rate down 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–3–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.11
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 625ms

Last 10

  • 2–7–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 580ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 585ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim7.1
Utility4.6
Positioning3.9
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.4

Strong T-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 51% on T to 19% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 619ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning3.9
Utility4.6
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact3.3

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.04
Reaction time592ms−8ms
first ⅓ avg 600ms → last ⅓ avg 592ms
Headshot accuracy19.1%+0.2%
first ⅓ avg 18.9% → last ⅓ avg 19.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 9–5 · eldorado, 14 Sept →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 3–8 · mirage, 6 Sept →
359msFastest reaction time · 0–4 · ancient, 15 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 13 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L3Current streak
9–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 80% over 10anubisWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC3414–2041%-0.03
ancientD155–1033%-0.04
cacheB136–746%-0.02
dust2C114–736%-0.01
infernoS108–280%-0.02
nukeD82–625%-0.07
anubisD61–517%-0.03
eldorado—21–150%0.07
poseidon—10–10%-0.25

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

74Matches
58%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
71.5ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
12%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2552%0.9513.5
Nuke1275%2.5215.9
Dust21060%0.9014.8
Inferno967%0.8715.0
Ancient825%0.7512.9
Cache560%0.609.6
Anubis367%0.478.0
Train1100%0.6517.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.3%Headshot accuracy
35.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.9%Spray accuracy
81.1%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
619msReaction time
51.5%T opening success
18.7%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
4.9%Flash assists
9.51HE damage / grenade
6.98Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 18.6911% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke5–9-0.2638%21 Oct →
poseidon2–9-0.2518%21 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0628%15 Oct →
mirage13–100.0415%15 Oct →
mirage12–12-0.0213%15 Oct →
ancient0–4-0.110%15 Oct →
nuke2–13-0.0424%27 Sept →
dust27–130.0126%23 Sept →
mirage13–110.0124%21 Sept →
ancient12–16-0.0723%18 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0627%17 Sept →
inferno9–7-0.0727%15 Sept →
cache13–100.0018%15 Sept →
inferno9–3-0.0911%14 Sept →
eldorado4–9-0.0113%14 Sept →
inferno9–6-0.0217%14 Sept →
eldorado9–50.1533%14 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.046%13 Sept →
nuke13–5-0.0427%13 Sept →
cache5–13-0.0011%13 Sept →
ancient13–00.1313%13 Sept →
mirage13–30.0111%12 Sept →
cache13–10-0.0733%12 Sept →
mirage13–80.019%12 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0018%12 Sept →
dust28–13-0.1532%12 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0320%12 Sept →
ancient11–11-0.0311%12 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0313%12 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0318%12 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0411%11 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0437%11 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0810%11 Sept →
ancient2–13-0.1418%11 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0725%11 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.0513%11 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0123%11 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0421%11 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0115%11 Sept →
mirage15–150.0114%10 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0412%10 Sept →
inferno9–70.0135%9 Sept →
inferno9–40.1333%9 Sept →
mirage16–13-0.0417%9 Sept →
mirage9–0-0.0217%9 Sept →
mirage13–20.0315%9 Sept →
ancient13–3-0.0114%9 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0614%9 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0219%9 Sept →
dust213–80.0514%9 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0717%8 Sept →
mirage6–130.0122%8 Sept →
cache9–130.0114%8 Sept →
cache3–13-0.0822%8 Sept →
cache13–90.0024%8 Sept →
anubis13–7-0.0914%8 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0214%8 Sept →
mirage1–12-0.0433%7 Sept →
inferno13–90.0420%7 Sept →
ancient15–15-0.0419%7 Sept →
cache13–16-0.0622%7 Sept →
nuke13–5-0.0221%7 Sept →
mirage13–2-0.0213%7 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0620%7 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0315%7 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0223%6 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0324%6 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.0614%6 Sept →
ancient1–13-0.0519%6 Sept →
mirage3–8-0.0250%6 Sept →
nuke12–160.0434%6 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.028%6 Sept →
mirage14–16-0.0814%6 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0717%6 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0021%6 Sept →
dust213–80.0423%6 Sept →
dust27–130.0428%5 Sept →
anubis13–16-0.0420%5 Sept →
ancient13–40.0025%5 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0410%5 Sept →
mirage15–15-0.0517%5 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0014%5 Sept →
mirage13–3-0.0727%5 Sept →
inferno13–3-0.069%5 Sept →
anubis12–160.0021%5 Sept →
dust213–11-0.038%4 Sept →
mirage13–90.0511%4 Sept →
cache2–13-0.0118%3 Sept →
dust211–130.0116%3 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0121%3 Sept →
cache13–40.0525%3 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0512%2 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0323%2 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.1012%2 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0813%2 Sept →
cache13–7-0.0413%1 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0413%1 Sept →
inferno15–15-0.0319%1 Sept →
cache12–16-0.0418%1 Sept →
nuke5–9-0.1631%30 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.