❤

— CS2 Stats

76561198167156927[U:1:206891199]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,939Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidSupport
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Sep 2026 (14 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,651 → 2,651
+1Tracked matches · now 1,939
−3.3ppWin rate · 63.3% → 60.0%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 45 days played since 27 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,642 +70 2 Feb14 Jun · 28 days played
20,53924,999peak 24,9992 Feb14 Jun
25,000Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,651Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
45Days played since 2026-01-27

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,651
  • Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 349 to go
  • Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPEAK ELO2,651csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning47
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56422Last 10056%Win rateLWLWLWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +5.4pp headshot accuracy · +16ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 555ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 640ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 632ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility5.0
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch3.8

Strong T-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 37 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 640ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning4.7
Utility5.0
Mechanics8.0
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time642ms+16ms
first ⅓ avg 625ms → last ⅓ avg 642ms
Headshot accuracy25.8%+0.1%
first ⅓ avg 25.7% → last ⅓ avg 25.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–6 · dust2, 31 Jan
48%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · ancient, 24 Apr
469msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · ancient, 16 Apr
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 25 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
97In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 65% over 23anubisWeakest map · 44% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B25131252%0.03
mirageS2315865%0.03
ancientA1810856%0.02
infernoB115645%0.01
anubisC94544%0.01
overpassA85363%0.03
cache43175%0.10
nuke21150%0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,150Matches
51%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
78.2ADR
58%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage25448%1.1116.4
Dust216350%1.1316.0
Inferno13544%1.2216.8
Ancient12961%1.1516.2
Anubis11750%1.1516.3
Vertigo3746%1.2018.1
Nuke3444%0.9815.0
Overpass2959%1.2016.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.5%Headshot accuracy
39.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.6%Spray accuracy
85.8%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
640msReaction time
41.3%T opening success
29.4%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
5.6%Flash assists
7.16HE damage / grenade
11.44Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4697 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 29.4053% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust21–13-0.0339%4 Sept
dust213–110.0642%2 Sept
dust25–13-0.0426%30 Aug
mirage16–140.0117%30 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0220%3 Aug
dust213–50.0426%3 Aug
dust213–11-0.0933%14 Jun
dust216–120.0431%23 May
ancient13–40.0714%23 May
mirage5–13-0.0531%22 May
ancient11–130.0223%20 May
dust27–13-0.087%20 May
overpass13–50.1726%20 May
dust213–100.0217%20 May
inferno5–13-0.0032%19 May
ancient16–140.0024%19 May
ancient9–130.0120%19 May
dust214–16-0.0126%18 May
anubis1–13-0.0533%18 May
cache5–130.0817%11 May
mirage13–7-0.0120%10 May
ancient13–10-0.0339%10 May
anubis13–50.0416%8 May
ancient13–40.0227%8 May
cache13–50.1722%8 May
mirage13–40.1537%8 May
mirage13–100.0535%8 May
ancient13–90.0423%5 May
anubis9–130.0719%5 May
mirage13–20.0932%5 May
ancient13–5-0.0230%5 May
cache13–110.0522%4 May
cache13–100.1123%4 May
mirage13–9-0.0638%1 May
inferno13–3-0.0231%25 Apr
overpass13–100.0314%25 Apr
anubis8–13-0.0129%25 Apr
mirage13–40.0020%25 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0826%25 Apr
ancient13–00.0426%25 Apr
mirage13–50.0422%25 Apr
ancient6–130.0048%24 Apr
mirage13–110.0925%23 Apr
dust29–130.0144%22 Apr
overpass4–13-0.0225%21 Apr
inferno13–110.0235%20 Apr
nuke14–160.0728%19 Apr
ancient1–13-0.0118%19 Apr
mirage13–20.0137%19 Apr
dust213–30.0725%18 Apr
anubis11–13-0.0228%18 Apr
ancient13–90.0330%18 Apr
ancient4–130.0412%18 Apr
inferno11–130.0243%18 Apr
ancient13–10.1633%16 Apr
ancient4–13-0.0614%16 Apr
mirage13–80.0629%15 Apr
dust20–13-0.0530%15 Apr
dust213–30.0926%14 Apr
overpass13–40.0123%14 Apr
dust29–130.0224%13 Apr
mirage13–70.1028%13 Apr
dust26–13-0.0024%13 Apr
inferno9–130.1134%13 Apr
dust29–130.0432%13 Apr
inferno13–80.0530%16 Mar
dust215–150.1133%14 Mar
dust213–70.0516%14 Mar
overpass13–30.1016%14 Mar
overpass4–13-0.0821%20 Feb
mirage10–130.0229%15 Feb
dust216–120.0031%13 Feb
anubis13–100.0925%7 Feb
overpass16–140.0422%6 Feb
mirage3–13-0.0028%5 Feb
mirage6–130.0329%5 Feb
mirage13–30.0420%5 Feb
dust210–13-0.0739%4 Feb
inferno6–13-0.0139%4 Feb
inferno7–13-0.0321%3 Feb
mirage15–150.0318%3 Feb
anubis13–11-0.0213%3 Feb
mirage13–20.0317%3 Feb
ancient11–130.0225%3 Feb
dust213–10.1116%2 Feb
overpass7–13-0.0143%1 Feb
dust211–130.0214%1 Feb
dust213–60.1926%31 Jan
mirage1–8-0.0436%30 Jan
dust213–80.1025%30 Jan
mirage9–130.0729%30 Jan
inferno13–9-0.0116%30 Jan
inferno13–100.0535%30 Jan
dust213–100.0831%29 Jan
nuke13–70.1337%29 Jan
anubis13–3-0.0729%29 Jan
mirage13–90.0625%28 Jan
inferno9–13-0.0236%28 Jan
anubis8–130.0721%27 Jan
ancient13–40.0818%27 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2.5K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →