☻Deivas☻

☻Deivas☻ — CS2 Stats

76561198166364341[U:1:206098613]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,537Tracked matches45%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.4 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating14,696Blue band · top ~30% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4 · 929 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 21 days played since 16 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,696 -2,562 17 Aug16 Sept · 20 days played
13,58218,283peak 18,28317 Aug16 Sept
Faceit ELO: 929 +0 2 Sept3 Sept · 2 observations
929929peak 9292 Sept3 Sept
18,629Peak Premier in tracked matches
929Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
21Days played since 2026-08-16

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 929
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 122 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,587 below peak (18,283)
  • -2,562 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 304 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG☻Deivas☻FACEITLevel 4 · 929 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER14,696 · Blue bandPEAK ELO929csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim52
Positioning42
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46486Last 10046%Win rateLWWLLWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −0.1pp headshot accuracy · −53ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 669ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 624ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 650ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+0.9 against its own average).

Aim5.2
Utility4.8
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels1.8
Clutch4.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 638ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.2
Positioning4.2
Utility4.8
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels1.0
Win Impact3.3

Composite 4.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time636ms+9ms
first ⅓ avg 627ms → last ⅓ avg 636ms
Headshot accuracy11.8%−2.2%
first ⅓ avg 14.0% → last ⅓ avg 11.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–10 · cache, 26 Aug
28%Best headshot accuracy · 12–16 · cache, 2 Sept
438msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · mirage, 30 Aug
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 30 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
65In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
20Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 69% over 13infernoWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C27101737%-0.02
ancientC1771041%-0.02
nukeS139469%-0.00
cacheA138562%-0.01
infernoD124833%-0.03
mirageB115645%-0.02
anubisC73443%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

152Matches
53%Win rate
0.87Avg K/D
72.8ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust23653%0.8613.0
Mirage3262%0.9513.5
Ancient1861%0.9314.8
Inferno1553%0.8213.5
Nuke1155%0.9312.6
Anubis1040%0.8413.7
Overpass956%1.0116.1
Cache540%0.9216.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.2%Headshot accuracy
33.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.4%Spray accuracy
83.4%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
638msReaction time
28.1%T opening success
37.7%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
5.6%Flash assists
6.11HE damage / grenade
8.45Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.1813% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4772 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.0892% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno10–13-0.037%16 Sept
dust213–10-0.018%9 Sept
nuke13–11-0.028%9 Sept
dust214–160.0413%9 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0626%9 Sept
inferno13–8-0.0311%9 Sept
inferno13–16-0.0213%8 Sept
mirage7–130.0316%8 Sept
ancient13–10-0.067%8 Sept
dust29–13-0.047%8 Sept
mirage13–80.0415%8 Sept
dust213–60.1022%8 Sept
dust213–9-0.0611%5 Sept
cache13–10-0.1011%5 Sept
mirage13–90.0112%5 Sept
dust24–13-0.036%5 Sept
dust213–9-0.0213%5 Sept
inferno4–13-0.117%5 Sept
cache9–13-0.057%4 Sept
inferno5–13-0.0614%4 Sept
nuke4–13-0.0710%4 Sept
mirage11–130.0212%3 Sept
dust26–13-0.0215%3 Sept
nuke7–130.0315%3 Sept
cache12–16-0.0528%2 Sept
nuke15–15-0.048%2 Sept
dust213–9-0.039%2 Sept
ancient8–13-0.0513%2 Sept
mirage13–10-0.0313%2 Sept
nuke13–40.015%1 Sept
dust216–13-0.024%1 Sept
ancient13–16-0.047%1 Sept
anubis7–13-0.0719%1 Sept
cache1–13-0.0715%1 Sept
inferno0–13-0.0713%31 Aug
nuke13–40.0316%31 Aug
dust29–13-0.1012%31 Aug
mirage13–16-0.0914%31 Aug
nuke8–13-0.056%31 Aug
inferno16–14-0.0314%31 Aug
dust210–130.0117%31 Aug
cache4–13-0.0413%31 Aug
ancient5–13-0.068%31 Aug
mirage4–13-0.073%30 Aug
ancient15–150.0312%30 Aug
cache13–8-0.0117%30 Aug
dust211–13-0.0213%30 Aug
anubis13–00.106%30 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0021%30 Aug
ancient13–5-0.0314%30 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0819%30 Aug
nuke13–60.006%28 Aug
anubis13–110.0012%28 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0310%27 Aug
cache13–1-0.017%27 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0213%27 Aug
inferno13–20.0118%27 Aug
anubis12–16-0.0716%27 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0221%27 Aug
dust23–13-0.0917%27 Aug
ancient8–130.0116%26 Aug
cache13–100.1211%26 Aug
inferno13–70.0111%26 Aug
nuke16–14-0.0016%26 Aug
ancient13–6-0.017%26 Aug
mirage13–80.0013%26 Aug
dust210–13-0.028%26 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0514%25 Aug
dust214–160.008%25 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0521%25 Aug
anubis13–16-0.058%25 Aug
cache15–15-0.0623%25 Aug
nuke13–20.088%25 Aug
dust213–10-0.028%25 Aug
anubis13–80.017%24 Aug
dust29–13-0.0314%24 Aug
ancient13–20.0014%24 Aug
dust27–130.025%23 Aug
ancient16–12-0.0012%20 Aug
dust215–15-0.059%20 Aug
dust213–7-0.0319%20 Aug
ancient11–130.0010%20 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0424%20 Aug
nuke13–100.089%20 Aug
ancient15–150.0114%20 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0811%20 Aug
cache13–8-0.0326%20 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0710%19 Aug
dust23–13-0.0011%19 Aug
cache13–90.0613%19 Aug
ancient13–60.0416%19 Aug
cache13–40.069%18 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0311%18 Aug
dust213–110.0425%18 Aug
dust26–13-0.0117%18 Aug
inferno15–150.0213%17 Aug
dust213–160.0320%17 Aug
cache16–120.0614%17 Aug
dust213–50.0519%17 Aug
dust24–13-0.1221%16 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →