-borbas — CS2 Stats

76561198165652269[U:1:205386541]✓ No bans

1,813Tracked matches62%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating26,292Top 25% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#655 of 6743 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,442 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GG-borbasFACEITLevel 10 · 2,442 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER26,292 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning31
Utility38

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT51445Last 10051%Win rateWWLWWLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.5
Aggression1.0
Utility3.8
Positioning3.1
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.2

Excellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 74% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 44 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 35% on CT to 12% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 664ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning3.1
Utility3.8
Mechanics8.5
Opening Duels0.6
Win Impact9.0

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.05−0.04
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.05
Reaction time637ms+42ms
first ⅓ avg 594ms → last ⅓ avg 637ms
Headshot accuracy21.2%−4.2%
first ⅓ avg 25.4% → last ⅓ avg 21.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — mirage 13–9
132Biggest win — mirage
8Longest win streak
W2Current streak
57In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 71% over 7infernoWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB35171849%-0.01
ancientB1910953%-0.03
nukeA138562%-0.05
cacheA106460%-0.01
dust2C83538%-0.01
anubisS75271%0.01
infernoD61517%-0.03
shelter110100%-0.03
vertigo1010%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,743Matches
51%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
76.6ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage35354%1.0915.6
Ancient31753%1.0915.9
Anubis16750%0.9815.0
Nuke15554%1.0114.9
Dust210146%0.9515.2
Overpass5641%1.1016.2
Inferno4743%0.9815.3
Vertigo4445%0.9714.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.5%Headshot accuracy
32.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.9%Spray accuracy
88.4%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
664msReaction time
11.5%T opening success
34.7%CT opening success
0.43Enemies flashed / flash
6.6%Flash assists
6.32HE damage / grenade
6.88Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4313 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 11.5074% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–4-0.0317%8 Aug
cache13–110.0120%7 Aug
dust27–13-0.0517%5 Aug
mirage13–3-0.0314%4 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0727%1 Aug
mirage0–6-0.050%30 Jul
cache13–6-0.0722%28 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0538%28 Jul
nuke13–8-0.1129%27 Jul
ancient13–3-0.0318%27 Jul
mirage0–13-0.0850%27 Jul
mirage0–13-0.069%27 Jul
ancient13–30.0724%27 Jul
nuke4–13-0.160%26 Jul
nuke13–50.0519%22 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0114%20 Jul
cache7–13-0.0529%19 Jul
shelter13–6-0.0333%13 Jul
cache13–40.0423%10 Jul
mirage13–16-0.0820%10 Jul
mirage13–2-0.0115%9 Jul
ancient13–3-0.0814%9 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0220%9 Jul
mirage12–12-0.0914%9 Jul
cache10–5-0.0344%8 Jul
mirage0–5-0.090%6 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0422%6 Jul
ancient4–13-0.1050%5 Jul
inferno1–13-0.120%5 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0438%5 Jul
dust20–4-0.040%5 Jul
dust211–13-0.0232%4 Jul
mirage13–16-0.0127%2 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0218%21 Jun
nuke3–13-0.0522%21 Jun
cache13–70.0519%16 Jun
ancient13–20.0420%11 Jun
vertigo12–120.0515%6 Jun
dust213–9-0.0317%6 Jun
anubis13–50.0723%2 Jun
anubis13–2-0.069%31 May
ancient13–7-0.0133%29 May
mirage13–11-0.009%26 May
mirage0–7-0.010%25 May
mirage13–90.1321%20 May
anubis7–12-0.0611%20 May
ancient13–3-0.0617%17 May
dust210–130.0322%15 May
nuke4–13-0.0929%13 May
mirage13–50.0336%12 May
ancient11–13-0.0427%11 May
ancient0–2-0.120%10 May
ancient13–9-0.0330%9 May
mirage13–7-0.0033%9 May
nuke5–4-0.0216%9 May
nuke16–12-0.0424%9 May
ancient13–9-0.0324%8 May
mirage16–140.0217%6 May
anubis13–90.0628%30 Apr
mirage13–8-0.0418%30 Apr
cache8–13-0.0223%29 Apr
cache13–9-0.0437%28 Apr
cache11–130.0324%28 Apr
cache16–19-0.0418%28 Apr
dust211–130.0214%28 Apr
nuke13–8-0.0229%26 Apr
mirage4–130.0017%25 Apr
mirage13–70.0034%24 Apr
mirage14–16-0.0514%20 Apr
mirage1–13-0.1111%20 Apr
nuke8–13-0.0522%20 Apr
mirage1–13-0.0133%18 Apr
nuke13–9-0.0118%18 Apr
inferno1–13-0.1122%17 Apr
mirage6–130.0523%16 Apr
nuke15–15-0.0520%15 Apr
inferno13–11-0.0530%15 Apr
mirage11–130.0929%14 Apr
ancient3–13-0.0220%13 Apr
mirage12–120.0333%13 Apr
mirage13–90.1116%13 Apr
ancient13–16-0.0417%12 Apr
dust216–13-0.0328%12 Apr
nuke13–7-0.0219%12 Apr
anubis13–80.0530%9 Apr
mirage12–120.0429%9 Apr
mirage13–50.0426%9 Apr
ancient6–130.0414%9 Apr
mirage4–13-0.0833%8 Apr
ancient8–13-0.0827%7 Apr
mirage13–7-0.0516%5 Apr
ancient5–13-0.0750%5 Apr
dust213–100.0026%4 Apr
mirage13–50.0738%3 Apr
inferno7–130.0722%3 Apr
anubis10–13-0.0520%3 Apr
inferno8–130.0216%3 Apr
anubis13–90.0729%31 Mar
inferno5–13-0.0139%28 Mar
mirage7–130.0133%28 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →