Rhabby_v — CS2 Stats

76561198163814618[U:1:203548890]

1,909Tracked matches46%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.6 Developing
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

1Days observed since 2026-08-30

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRhabby_vFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim53
Positioning41
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY41518Last 10041%Win rateLWLLLWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.3
Aggression3.6
Utility4.7
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels0.7
Clutch2.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 76% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 652ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.3
Positioning4.1
Utility4.7
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact3.8

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time658ms−33ms
first ⅓ avg 691ms → last ⅓ avg 658ms
Headshot accuracy14.0%−0.1%
first ⅓ avg 14.0% → last ⅓ avg 14.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.07Best rating — cache 12–12
131Biggest win — mirage
9Longest win streak
811In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 60% over 10anubisWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC25111444%-0.02
ancientC2181338%-0.02
cacheB115645%-0.02
overpassD113827%-0.03
nukeA106460%-0.02
anubisD71614%-0.02
infernoA74357%-0.04
vertigoB63350%-0.00
dust22020%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,170Matches
49%Win rate
0.73Avg K/D
73.4ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
57%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient1450%0.9412.6
Mirage1338%0.6810.9
Anubis1040%0.6612.9
Vertigo956%0.7411.8
Overpass633%0.7411.3
Nuke10%0.7112.0
Inferno10%0.7311.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.7%Headshot accuracy
36.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.9%Spray accuracy
78.1%Counter-strafing
11.6°Preaim
652msReaction time
25.2%T opening success
40.0%CT opening success
0.70Enemies flashed / flash
3.5%Flash assists
15.32HE damage / grenade
2.56Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.7384% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 2.5643 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.2039% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis7–13-0.0313%30 Aug
ancient13–100.0412%27 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0414%27 Aug
anubis10–13-0.027%22 Aug
inferno4–13-0.130%22 Aug
cache14–120.0324%21 Aug
cache13–70.0019%4 Jul
ancient13–110.0114%4 Jul
inferno13–80.0116%21 Jun
nuke13–7-0.039%21 Jun
mirage13–70.0130%21 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0510%21 Jun
nuke13–90.0413%21 Jun
mirage13–10-0.059%21 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0210%20 Jun
nuke12–120.038%20 Jun
vertigo13–100.0211%20 Jun
cache3–13-0.0626%20 Jun
ancient6–13-0.055%20 Jun
overpass5–130.0410%20 Jun
overpass12–12-0.039%19 Jun
vertigo3–13-0.0311%19 Jun
ancient13–9-0.0516%18 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0320%18 Jun
mirage9–130.0615%17 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0225%17 Jun
overpass11–130.028%17 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0319%17 Jun
mirage13–110.049%16 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0319%16 Jun
ancient11–130.008%13 Jun
cache13–5-0.0218%13 Jun
mirage13–50.0223%13 Jun
anubis13–70.0116%12 Jun
mirage13–6-0.0113%9 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0210%9 Jun
ancient11–130.0011%7 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0410%7 Jun
anubis10–13-0.0314%6 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0113%6 Jun
overpass5–13-0.0413%6 Jun
ancient3–13-0.0913%6 Jun
anubis15–15-0.0111%4 Jun
nuke6–13-0.027%4 Jun
vertigo11–13-0.028%3 Jun
vertigo13–6-0.0025%3 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0112%31 May
anubis6–13-0.0414%28 May
nuke13–110.0113%28 May
ancient6–13-0.049%27 May
mirage13–10.0518%27 May
overpass13–90.0116%25 May
ancient11–130.0614%25 May
mirage15–15-0.049%25 May
overpass13–3-0.0615%24 May
mirage4–13-0.038%22 May
overpass4–13-0.0941%22 May
ancient13–11-0.069%22 May
ancient11–130.0215%22 May
cache13–9-0.0219%22 May
overpass5–13-0.028%21 May
mirage3–13-0.024%21 May
cache12–120.0721%21 May
mirage16–13-0.0813%21 May
cache7–13-0.069%20 May
nuke10–13-0.0311%19 May
mirage13–11-0.088%19 May
dust213–16-0.0510%18 May
inferno4–13-0.0921%18 May
nuke13–6-0.0517%18 May
ancient13–9-0.069%17 May
vertigo13–40.0715%17 May
mirage5–13-0.0721%14 May
ancient5–130.006%14 May
vertigo4–13-0.0514%14 May
cache12–12-0.0422%14 May
ancient10–13-0.0318%14 May
cache13–4-0.0715%13 May
mirage3–00.049%13 May
overpass7–13-0.0413%13 May
mirage12–12-0.018%12 May
cache8–13-0.0321%12 May
overpass3–13-0.066%12 May
nuke13–5-0.078%11 May
mirage11–13-0.055%11 May
ancient8–13-0.0317%11 May
inferno13–10-0.069%11 May
mirage9–13-0.0122%11 May
inferno13–6-0.0213%11 May
mirage7–13-0.127%11 May
dust24–13-0.1018%11 May
ancient13–10-0.029%10 May
mirage11–13-0.0615%10 May
ancient13–2-0.0012%10 May
overpass13–7-0.0320%10 May
mirage13–60.0014%10 May
nuke13–8-0.0114%10 May
cache12–12-0.0117%10 May
mirage9–13-0.068%9 May
inferno13–40.0033%9 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →