poof

poof — CS2 Stats

US76561198159593911[U:1:199328183]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

238Tracked matches47%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating15,825Purple band · top ~25.1% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Apr 2026 (162 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 48 days played since 11 Dec 2023. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,825 +5,226 11 Dec12 Apr · 18 days played
10,59917,493peak 17,49311 Dec12 Apr
18,015Peak Premier in tracked matches
48Days played since 2023-12-11

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,668 below peak (17,493)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 4,175 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGpoofFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER15,825 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning48
Utility31

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49501Last 10049%Win rateLLWWLWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −1.7pp headshot accuracy · +45ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 553ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 572ms

Last 20

  • 128 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility3.1
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels3.0
Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 575ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning4.8
Utility3.1
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time595ms−86ms
first ⅓ avg 681ms → last ⅓ avg 595ms
Headshot accuracy22.1%+0.8%
first ⅓ avg 21.4% → last ⅓ avg 22.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–4 · mirage, 3 Apr
46%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · inferno, 15 Jan
422msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · vertigo, 14 Dec
13–2Biggest win · dust2, 21 Mar

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L2Current streak
107In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 60% over 5anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB37201754%-0.00
dust2A25141156%-0.02
infernoD82625%-0.03
cacheA74357%-0.03
overpassD62433%-0.01
anubisD51420%-0.05
nukeC52340%-0.04
vertigoA53260%-0.03
ancient21150%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

143Matches
56%Win rate
0.85Avg K/D
64.3ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
15%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5254%0.8013.6
Dust23754%0.8113.6
Cache2458%0.9014.3
Anubis1850%0.6911.5
Ancient771%1.4318.3
Inferno3100%1.5216.0
Overpass1100%0.5212.0
Nuke10%0.447.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.6%Headshot accuracy
35.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.9%Spray accuracy
79.8%Counter-strafing
7.4°Preaim
575msReaction time
29.2%T opening success
51.2%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
2.4%Flash assists
4.02HE damage / grenade
9.73Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.2297% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust211–13-0.0716%17 Jun
anubis5–13-0.0627%14 Jun
cache19–16-0.0621%12 Jun
inferno13–50.1332%11 Jun
anubis11–13-0.0513%11 Jun
dust213–80.0226%8 Jun
mirage13–70.0213%6 Jun
mirage6–130.0415%6 Jun
dust25–13-0.0310%5 Jun
cache13–70.0325%2 Jun
mirage22–20-0.0226%1 Jun
anubis22–180.0121%31 May
dust28–130.0032%27 May
dust28–13-0.0333%27 May
cache16–14-0.0819%24 May
ancient13–110.0421%23 May
cache11–13-0.0215%23 May
mirage13–8-0.0416%23 May
dust213–100.0219%22 May
dust213–11-0.0512%18 May
mirage19–170.0233%17 May
cache9–13-0.0722%15 May
dust28–130.0016%15 May
mirage6–13-0.0532%15 May
cache11–13-0.0221%4 May
mirage10–13-0.0043%28 Apr
ancient6–130.0325%28 Apr
dust24–13-0.1327%26 Apr
cache13–100.0331%25 Apr
mirage12–16-0.0816%12 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0616%11 Apr
anubis4–13-0.0619%11 Apr
dust213–3-0.0319%11 Apr
dust213–50.0625%11 Apr
mirage4–13-0.0311%9 Apr
mirage13–5-0.000%7 Apr
dust26–13-0.0421%7 Apr
dust213–30.0224%6 Apr
overpass6–13-0.039%6 Apr
dust213–8-0.0522%3 Apr
dust213–90.0743%3 Apr
mirage13–40.1527%3 Apr
overpass4–13-0.0418%2 Apr
mirage4–130.0735%2 Apr
mirage6–130.0116%31 Mar
dust28–130.0118%31 Mar
mirage16–130.0428%27 Mar
mirage13–60.0813%27 Mar
nuke1–13-0.0842%27 Mar
mirage16–130.0326%27 Mar
inferno8–13-0.0826%27 Mar
mirage13–40.1230%27 Mar
dust27–13-0.0826%24 Mar
dust213–90.0820%24 Mar
mirage13–80.0216%24 Mar
dust213–10-0.0513%21 Mar
mirage13–4-0.0218%21 Mar
mirage13–7-0.0320%21 Mar
dust213–2-0.0815%21 Mar
mirage13–5-0.0619%21 Mar
anubis11–13-0.1110%18 Mar
inferno6–13-0.0827%18 Mar
dust210–130.0130%18 Mar
mirage13–7-0.0131%4 Mar
dust213–10-0.0523%4 Mar
inferno9–13-0.0519%4 Mar
inferno3–13-0.0425%28 Feb
mirage13–30.0115%22 Feb
dust25–13-0.0425%22 Feb
dust213–9-0.0236%16 Mar
mirage13–2-0.0136%14 Mar
mirage11–13-0.0524%14 Mar
dust213–90.0017%6 Mar
mirage5–13-0.0739%15 Feb
mirage9–10.0435%15 Feb
nuke7–13-0.0624%15 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0530%20 Jan
inferno4–13-0.0312%20 Jan
vertigo10–130.0118%17 Jan
nuke13–90.0116%17 Jan
mirage7–13-0.0117%16 Jan
overpass11–13-0.0315%16 Jan
vertigo4–13-0.0922%16 Jan
vertigo13–80.0117%16 Jan
overpass13–11-0.0031%16 Jan
inferno4–13-0.0646%15 Jan
mirage13–70.0221%15 Jan
mirage7–13-0.0223%15 Jan
inferno13–9-0.046%12 Jan
mirage15–15-0.0919%12 Jan
mirage12–16-0.0113%12 Jan
nuke2–13-0.0911%12 Jan
nuke13–110.044%8 Jan
vertigo13–11-0.089%8 Jan
overpass13–70.0523%14 Dec
vertigo13–11-0.026%14 Dec
mirage13–11-0.0115%14 Dec
mirage9–13-0.0130%14 Dec
mirage8–13-0.0729%11 Dec
overpass9–13-0.0322%11 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →