3M

3M — CS2 Stats

76561198158276079[U:1:198010351]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,908Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.7 StrongAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating27,462Top 5% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#764 of 22828 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

26,704Peak Premier on CSDB
2,324Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-27

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,324
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 176 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 27,462
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 2,538 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG3MPREMIER27,462 · Red bandPEAK ELO2,324csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning73
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT63361Last 10063%Win rateWWWWWTLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.4
Aggression9.2
Utility6.2
Positioning7.3
Opening Duels4.6
Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 59% on CT to 39% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 607ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning7.3
Utility6.2
Mechanics7.9
Opening Duels4.6
Win Impact7.9

Composite 7.7/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time617ms+21ms
first ⅓ avg 596ms → last ⅓ avg 617ms
Headshot accuracy30.9%+4.6%
first ⅓ avg 26.3% → last ⅓ avg 30.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — dust2 13–7
130Biggest win — dust2
6Longest win streak
W5Current streak
129In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 80% over 5infernoWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA37231462%0.02
dust2S2820871%0.03
ancientA1610663%0.05
infernoD92722%0.02
cacheS54180%0.05
anubis220100%0.04
nuke21150%-0.02
overpass110100%0.14

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,504Matches
53%Win rate
1.21Avg K/D
92.7ADR
59%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
16Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage26057%1.3119.6
Dust215651%1.2819.6
Ancient6752%1.1817.9
Anubis5857%1.3018.9
Inferno5761%1.2718.3
Overpass2162%1.4619.8
Nuke1953%1.2917.5
Train862%1.4718.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

30.4%Headshot accuracy
35.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.6%Spray accuracy
85.5%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
607msReaction time
38.5%T opening success
58.5%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
12.2%Flash assists
7.87HE damage / grenade
11.80Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.5145% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–40.0930%28 Aug
dust213–100.0226%28 Aug
dust213–60.0446%26 Aug
ancient13–90.1427%24 Aug
dust213–70.1633%24 Aug
inferno12–120.1045%21 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0227%21 Aug
mirage7–130.0250%14 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0331%10 Aug
mirage13–80.0733%9 Aug
dust211–130.0635%9 Aug
inferno11–130.0126%9 Aug
mirage19–170.0622%9 Aug
dust212–16-0.0336%7 Aug
cache1–13-0.0630%6 Aug
dust216–130.0240%6 Aug
dust213–9-0.0220%3 Aug
mirage13–16-0.0528%2 Aug
ancient13–40.1023%29 Jul
anubis16–120.0335%28 Jul
dust213–30.1035%28 Jul
ancient13–110.0218%27 Jul
inferno10–130.0128%27 Jul
mirage9–130.0231%27 Jul
mirage7–130.0133%21 Jul
mirage13–100.0919%20 Jul
ancient13–60.0612%17 Jul
mirage11–130.0430%15 Jul
dust212–70.0335%11 Jul
mirage10–130.0930%11 Jul
mirage13–60.0428%10 Jul
cache13–10.1455%10 Jul
mirage16–130.0622%9 Jul
inferno13–20.1231%9 Jul
cache13–110.0327%6 Jul
dust25–130.0028%5 Jul
cache13–30.0724%4 Jul
mirage13–50.0520%4 Jul
dust213–10-0.0330%4 Jul
overpass13–80.1440%4 Jul
mirage5–130.0242%3 Jul
dust213–80.0527%3 Jul
ancient13–80.0321%3 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0128%3 Jul
mirage13–110.0432%3 Jul
dust24–13-0.0231%3 Jul
mirage13–60.0221%3 Jul
dust213–110.0823%2 Jul
cache13–110.0626%2 Jul
dust213–110.0536%2 Jul
nuke13–16-0.0321%2 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0528%1 Jul
mirage13–90.0537%1 Jul
mirage13–100.0215%1 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0444%30 Jun
mirage13–70.0529%30 Jun
mirage13–30.0728%30 Jun
dust27–13-0.0133%30 Jun
mirage13–70.0341%30 Jun
dust213–110.0430%29 Jun
ancient13–60.0941%29 Jun
ancient13–90.0733%29 Jun
ancient6–130.0128%29 Jun
dust23–130.0539%29 Jun
dust26–13-0.0118%29 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0430%29 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0323%28 Jun
ancient10–130.0732%28 Jun
anubis13–80.0533%28 Jun
inferno13–5-0.0121%24 Jun
ancient3–13-0.0218%19 Jun
dust216–130.0136%18 Jun
ancient13–40.1126%18 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0317%18 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0314%17 Jun
inferno11–130.0727%16 Jun
dust213–70.0636%16 Jun
mirage13–60.0227%13 Jun
mirage9–130.0538%13 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0136%13 Jun
nuke13–11-0.0123%12 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0221%10 Jun
dust213–11-0.0137%9 Jun
dust213–100.0524%9 Jun
mirage13–90.0021%8 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0128%8 Jun
ancient11–130.0827%8 Jun
mirage8–130.0116%8 Jun
dust214–16-0.0532%7 Jun
mirage6–4-0.0814%6 Jun
dust213–00.0225%6 Jun
dust213–30.1338%5 Jun
dust213–60.0836%5 Jun
ancient13–6-0.0015%4 Jun
mirage16–130.0019%3 Jun
mirage5–130.0312%2 Jun
mirage13–80.0731%31 May
dust213–100.0115%25 May
mirage6–130.0638%23 May
ancient13–110.0537%23 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →