Whiteold

Whiteold — CS2 Stats

76561198158029024[U:1:197763296]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,420Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,797 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Sep 2026 (9 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,797 → 1,797
+6Tracked matches · now 3,420
−6.7ppWin rate · 70.0% → 63.3%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 42 days played since 18 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 1,797 +0 28 Aug10 Sept · 4 observations
1,7971,797peak 1,79728 Aug10 Sept
1,797Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
42Days played since 2026-03-18

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,797
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 204 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGWhiteoldFACEITLevel 9 · 1,797 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO1,797csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning52
Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY59365Last 10059%Win rateLWWLWWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · +3.9pp headshot accuracy · −20ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 624ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 571ms

Last 20

  • 155 · 75% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim6.7
Utility6.6
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels3.6
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 567ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning5.2
Utility6.6
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact9.4

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time575ms−66ms
first ⅓ avg 641ms → last ⅓ avg 575ms
Headshot accuracy20.2%+1.2%
first ⅓ avg 19.0% → last ⅓ avg 20.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–3 · nuke, 11 Jul
42%Best headshot accuracy · 9–2 · dust2, 28 Aug
453msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · inferno, 30 Jun
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 4 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
129In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 80% over 15infernoWeakest map · 38% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS31201165%0.01
dust2A2011955%0.00
infernoC1661038%-0.00
ancientS1512380%-0.00
cacheA74357%-0.02
anubis41325%-0.01
overpass43175%-0.00
nuke32167%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,284Matches
50%Win rate
0.95Avg K/D
74.3ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage49052%1.0014.7
Dust225443%0.9414.3
Inferno20656%0.9214.8
Ancient17847%0.9014.3
Anubis11044%0.9614.9
Nuke5946%0.8113.4
Vertigo5652%0.9314.4
Overpass4052%0.8514.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.9%Headshot accuracy
32.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.8%Spray accuracy
77.7%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
567msReaction time
33.5%T opening success
50.8%CT opening success
0.70Enemies flashed / flash
10.0%Flash assists
10.02HE damage / grenade
12.26Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.4889% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage17–19-0.0022%12 Sept
mirage13–6-0.0422%12 Sept
inferno13–50.0321%12 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0324%12 Sept
mirage13–80.1020%28 Aug
dust213–40.0730%28 Aug
dust29–20.0942%28 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0521%26 Aug
inferno13–110.0524%26 Aug
mirage13–110.0116%25 Aug
dust213–6-0.0124%24 Aug
dust213–110.0118%23 Aug
mirage13–40.0216%23 Aug
mirage16–14-0.0132%23 Aug
inferno19–15-0.0125%21 Aug
mirage16–14-0.0320%21 Aug
inferno19–17-0.0118%21 Aug
dust22–13-0.048%18 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0614%18 Aug
dust213–9-0.0328%14 Aug
ancient14–160.0324%14 Aug
mirage13–40.0713%11 Aug
ancient16–13-0.0410%11 Aug
dust212–16-0.0315%6 Aug
anubis10–130.0122%6 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0326%1 Aug
ancient13–90.0027%29 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0616%29 Jul
inferno5–130.0219%27 Jul
cache13–90.0616%27 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0311%27 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0111%26 Jul
dust213–110.0214%26 Jul
mirage13–40.0717%25 Jul
inferno16–13-0.0119%25 Jul
dust213–30.1028%25 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0122%18 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0217%17 Jul
dust26–130.0521%16 Jul
dust26–13-0.0920%14 Jul
ancient13–80.0217%14 Jul
dust211–13-0.0022%13 Jul
cache5–13-0.0817%13 Jul
ancient13–40.0410%13 Jul
mirage15–150.0219%13 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0018%12 Jul
anubis12–120.0114%11 Jul
nuke13–30.1717%11 Jul
inferno6–130.0411%11 Jul
cache12–12-0.0521%11 Jul
mirage13–70.0529%11 Jul
mirage6–130.0529%11 Jul
ancient13–100.0220%10 Jul
mirage13–80.0332%10 Jul
inferno12–120.0015%10 Jul
cache13–9-0.0417%10 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0317%9 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0224%9 Jul
mirage13–20.1030%9 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0614%9 Jul
cache13–7-0.0318%9 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0022%9 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0119%8 Jul
cache13–9-0.0010%8 Jul
overpass13–9-0.0219%4 Jul
mirage10–130.0121%4 Jul
inferno13–10.0921%4 Jul
mirage13–00.0914%4 Jul
anubis5–13-0.1015%1 Jul
ancient16–140.0123%1 Jul
anubis13–60.0313%30 Jun
mirage6–130.0220%30 Jun
inferno9–130.0525%30 Jun
dust25–13-0.0715%29 Jun
mirage13–90.0025%29 Jun
dust29–13-0.0216%29 Jun
dust213–11-0.0517%26 Jun
dust211–13-0.0027%23 Jun
mirage13–80.0315%23 Jun
mirage13–80.0617%5 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0232%5 Jun
dust213–9-0.0414%5 Jun
ancient13–8-0.0020%5 Jun
overpass13–10-0.0310%5 Jun
dust213–11-0.0131%21 May
inferno6–13-0.1110%21 May
mirage13–60.0019%21 May
cache12–12-0.0118%21 May
nuke13–70.0721%21 May
ancient16–13-0.0110%10 May
ancient13–8-0.0232%10 May
dust211–130.0329%27 Apr
overpass12–16-0.0221%20 Apr
mirage13–8-0.0410%14 Apr
ancient13–60.0014%6 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0514%6 Apr
mirage20–22-0.0324%28 Mar
mirage12–160.0120%27 Mar
dust213–110.0225%27 Mar
overpass13–40.0611%18 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →