VeniVidiVici|LUCKY××

VeniVidiVici|LUCKY×× — CS2 Stats

LI76561198156937115[U:1:196671387]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,100Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating18,447Purple band · top ~14.7% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,447 +2,059 3 May – 30 Sept · 28 days played
15,82622,272peak 22,2723 May30 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,824 +0 20 Sept – 24 Sept · 3 observations
1,8241,824peak 1,82420 Sept24 Sept
22,377Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,824Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
37Days played since 2026-05-01

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,824
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 177 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-20
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-20

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,825 below peak (22,272)
  • -399 over 30 days · steady
  • +1,744 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,553 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-20
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-20

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGVeniVidiVici|LUCKY××PREMIER18,447 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,824csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning48
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46–50–4Last 10046%Win rateLWTWWWWWTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +5.8pp headshot accuracy · +58ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–1–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 31%
  • Avg reaction 591ms

Last 10

  • 6–2–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 675ms

Last 20

  • 11–7–2 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 646ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim6.4
Utility5.8
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch2.2

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 632ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning4.8
Utility5.8
Mechanics5.8
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact7.9

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time643ms−45ms
first ⅓ avg 688ms → last ⅓ avg 643ms
Headshot accuracy24.1%−1.1%
first ⅓ avg 25.1% → last ⅓ avg 24.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–4 · cache, 6 May →
52%Best headshot accuracy · 12–12 · anubis, 18 Sept →
367msFastest reaction time · 3–0 · inferno, 31 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 31 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
3–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 80% over 5anubisWeakest map · 36% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheC2511–1444%-0.02
mirageC166–1038%-0.03
anubisC145–936%-0.02
infernoS139–469%-0.04
dust2B115–645%-0.01
nukeS54–180%-0.03
ancient—42–250%-0.03
train—42–250%0.01
vertigo—40–40%-0.04
eldorado—11–0100%-0.00
poseidon—11–0100%0.12
debris—10–10%-0.03
office—10–10%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

402Matches
52%Win rate
0.81Avg K/D
62.8ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3554%0.8312.1
Inferno3158%0.8712.8
Dust22752%0.8312.9
Anubis1753%0.7611.2
Ancient1338%0.8211.6
Nuke1362%0.6611.5
Overpass771%0.8314.6
Cache250%0.6010.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.5%Headshot accuracy
32.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.7%Spray accuracy
76.2%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
632msReaction time
28.4%T opening success
42.7%CT opening success
0.73Enemies flashed / flash
7.2%Flash assists
8.07HE damage / grenade
7.49Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.393% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache7–13-0.0531%30 Sept →
cache13–60.0127%30 Sept →
anubis12–12-0.0352%18 Sept →
anubis13–9-0.0114%18 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.0430%11 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0120%11 Sept →
eldorado9–3-0.0050%4 Sept →
poseidon9–50.1240%4 Sept →
debris8–8-0.0321%4 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0910%2 Sept →
anubis13–80.0017%2 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0325%2 Sept →
office3–13-0.0232%2 Sept →
dust216–130.0022%31 Aug →
mirage13–4-0.0121%31 Aug →
inferno3–00.0340%31 Aug →
mirage3–13-0.0613%31 Aug →
inferno13–1-0.0118%31 Aug →
ancient7–130.0133%30 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0915%30 Aug →
mirage2–13-0.0714%30 Aug →
nuke13–9-0.0129%30 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0625%26 Aug →
cache13–8-0.039%26 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.0428%26 Aug →
mirage3–13-0.088%24 Aug →
cache7–13-0.1020%24 Aug →
dust213–20.0529%24 Aug →
ancient13–6-0.0429%23 Aug →
dust213–9-0.0013%23 Aug →
mirage16–13-0.0422%23 Aug →
cache13–70.0124%23 Aug →
cache13–3-0.0415%19 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0219%19 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0535%19 Aug →
dust213–2-0.0017%13 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0829%13 Aug →
train5–130.0237%13 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0247%9 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0138%9 Aug →
mirage9–130.0225%6 Aug →
cache11–13-0.049%6 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0348%6 Aug →
vertigo8–130.0122%3 Aug →
vertigo2–12-0.1118%29 Jul →
anubis5–13-0.0724%29 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.0613%22 Jul →
inferno13–50.0128%22 Jul →
anubis7–13-0.0816%22 Jul →
dust23–6-0.0120%17 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.0830%15 Jul →
cache10–130.0024%15 Jul →
anubis6–130.0134%15 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.0827%13 Jul →
cache13–7-0.0331%13 Jul →
inferno13–8-0.0125%13 Jul →
ancient14–16-0.0429%13 Jul →
dust213–80.0524%13 Jul →
anubis13–10-0.0230%12 Jul →
nuke9–13-0.0420%12 Jul →
inferno13–11-0.0811%12 Jul →
mirage13–8-0.0532%12 Jul →
anubis9–130.0217%11 Jul →
mirage13–20.0414%11 Jul →
inferno13–9-0.0832%11 Jul →
dust214–16-0.0426%10 Jul →
nuke13–8-0.0740%10 Jul →
cache13–9-0.0521%10 Jul →
cache11–130.0127%10 Jul →
inferno13–6-0.0535%10 Jul →
cache13–4-0.0136%5 Jul →
cache13–30.0124%5 Jul →
inferno11–13-0.0321%26 Jun →
ancient13–7-0.0429%26 Jun →
inferno10–13-0.0530%24 Jun →
mirage13–7-0.0233%24 Jun →
train12–120.0239%17 Jun →
dust210–130.0127%15 Jun →
anubis14–16-0.0415%15 Jun →
train13–4-0.0026%10 Jun →
cache13–3-0.0126%10 Jun →
mirage7–13-0.036%6 Jun →
vertigo10–13-0.0426%3 Jun →
vertigo9–13-0.0033%3 Jun →
nuke13–5-0.0021%3 Jun →
anubis13–40.0432%3 Jun →
cache11–13-0.0334%27 May →
anubis6–13-0.1021%27 May →
anubis13–50.0720%27 May →
inferno13–70.0224%13 May →
mirage10–130.0234%13 May →
train13–110.0119%11 May →
inferno10–13-0.0615%6 May →
cache13–40.1725%6 May →
cache1–13-0.1027%3 May →
cache9–13-0.0719%3 May →
cache12–12-0.0415%3 May →
dust25–13-0.0512%3 May →
cache13–50.0231%1 May →
cache11–130.0124%1 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.