TEMU Twistzz

TEMU Twistzz — CS2 Stats

IM76561198154470764[U:1:194205036]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,594Tracked matches68%Win rate2020Tracked since
8,269Hours in CS20Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating24,992Top 25% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#24055 of 261515 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Nov 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 24,992 → 24,992
+4Tracked matches · now 2,594
−1.1ppWin rate · 69.0% → 67.9%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,992 +3,787 6 Jul – 10 Nov · 24 days played
20,54724,992peak 24,9926 Jul10 Nov
24,992Peak Premier in tracked matches
29Days played since 2026-07-06

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 24,992
  • +1,470 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 8 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-11
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-11

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches27——
Win rate63%——
K/D1.29——
Headshot %64%——

Measured 6 Nov 2026 → 14 Nov 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,595), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate50.2%45.7%46.8%above
Shot accuracy17.9%12.7%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio1.111.051.06above
Match win rate44.9%45.7%46.3%1.4% short

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTEMU TwistzzFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER24,992 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning49
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55–39–6Last 10055%Win rateLTWLWWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +1.1pp headshot accuracy · −26ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 34%
  • Avg reaction 548ms

Last 10

  • 6–3–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 32%
  • Avg reaction 548ms

Last 20

  • 14–5–1 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 32%
  • Avg reaction 561ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility5.5
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels1.7
Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 565ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning4.9
Utility5.5
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time567ms−19ms
first ⅓ avg 585ms → last ⅓ avg 567ms
Headshot accuracy30.3%−1.1%
first ⅓ avg 31.4% → last ⅓ avg 30.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.27Best match rating · 9–1 · inferno, 9 Nov →
55%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · cache, 4 Aug →
406msFastest reaction time · 15–15 · cache, 21 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 22 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
3–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 71% over 21anubisWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheS2115–671%0.03
mirageB1910–953%0.01
nukeB179–853%0.03
infernoA1710–759%0.06
dust2A127–558%0.01
anubisD71–614%0.01
ancientC52–340%0.03
fachwerk—10–10%0.00
poseidon—11–0100%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

223,752Lifetime kills
1.11K/D · Top 50% of Level 7 players
10,145Matches
44.9%Match win rate
50.2%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 7 players
17.9%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 7 players
31,551MVPs
4,749Hours (in match)
8,543Bombs planted
3,017Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4766,030
AWP41,944
SG 5537,063
P2503,924
FAMAS3,652
Knife3,409

Lifetime map wins

16,740inferno
12,078dust2
10,171nuke
9,472train
2,530vertigo
1,532cbble
475office
185lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,069Matches
50%Win rate
1.19Avg K/D
81.3ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4353%1.1817.5
Anubis3247%1.1517.5
Ancient2352%1.3419.6
Inferno2040%1.4117.6
Dust21942%1.1916.4
Vertigo1145%1.0813.4
Nuke1030%1.1418.2
Cache560%2.0618.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

30.7%Headshot accuracy
35.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.2%Spray accuracy
78.4%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
565msReaction time
28.7%T opening success
51.1%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
5.2%Flash assists
9.49HE damage / grenade
9.19Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.7267% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke4–13-0.0529%10 Nov →
inferno15–15-0.0525%10 Nov →
mirage13–7-0.0733%10 Nov →
ancient14–16-0.0235%10 Nov →
mirage16–120.0046%10 Nov →
cache13–60.0534%10 Nov →
cache13–4-0.0115%9 Nov →
nuke11–130.0643%9 Nov →
inferno9–10.2732%9 Nov →
mirage13–90.0832%9 Nov →
dust25–13-0.0631%9 Nov →
inferno13–40.0532%9 Nov →
cache13–70.1038%8 Nov →
mirage16–120.0433%8 Nov →
mirage13–10-0.0330%8 Nov →
nuke13–70.0928%7 Nov →
nuke13–90.1129%7 Nov →
mirage11–130.1118%7 Nov →
nuke13–30.1137%6 Nov →
cache13–90.0837%6 Nov →
inferno13–100.0230%6 Nov →
inferno13–100.1029%27 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0225%27 Oct →
dust213–100.0227%27 Oct →
dust215–15-0.0231%27 Oct →
ancient13–50.0428%26 Oct →
mirage13–70.0428%26 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.0626%26 Oct →
cache13–70.0331%26 Oct →
anubis7–130.0723%23 Oct →
mirage2–13-0.0729%23 Oct →
inferno13–5-0.0232%23 Oct →
anubis13–50.0523%23 Oct →
dust211–130.0133%27 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0311%24 Sept →
cache15–150.0928%21 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.076%8 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0428%8 Sept →
dust213–50.0937%8 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0238%7 Sept →
nuke3–13-0.0321%7 Sept →
cache13–7-0.0212%1 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0027%1 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0446%30 Aug →
cache13–80.0546%30 Aug →
inferno10–130.0439%16 Aug →
mirage13–160.0228%16 Aug →
cache13–100.0229%16 Aug →
nuke13–80.1029%16 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0129%10 Aug →
dust213–50.0745%4 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.0429%4 Aug →
cache16–140.0236%4 Aug →
mirage13–70.0245%4 Aug →
inferno10–130.0752%4 Aug →
cache13–70.0655%4 Aug →
ancient13–80.0429%4 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0816%4 Aug →
cache13–90.0052%4 Aug →
nuke13–70.0335%4 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0414%4 Aug →
inferno15–150.0535%3 Aug →
nuke13–20.1329%3 Aug →
dust213–100.0222%3 Aug →
ancient15–150.0524%3 Aug →
dust213–80.0136%3 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0229%2 Aug →
inferno10–130.0239%2 Aug →
cache13–70.0124%2 Aug →
dust213–80.0625%2 Aug →
cache13–80.0845%1 Aug →
inferno13–100.1537%1 Aug →
cache13–20.0837%1 Aug →
anubis6–130.0628%28 Jul →
nuke13–30.0830%28 Jul →
fachwerk8–130.0023%22 Jul →
cache9–130.0220%22 Jul →
ancient15–150.0332%22 Jul →
anubis10–13-0.0446%22 Jul →
mirage13–9-0.0231%22 Jul →
inferno13–10.1239%22 Jul →
mirage13–90.0425%22 Jul →
dust213–70.0324%22 Jul →
mirage5–130.0420%22 Jul →
nuke13–90.0633%20 Jul →
mirage13–80.0538%20 Jul →
cache13–50.0550%20 Jul →
mirage9–130.0224%18 Jul →
cache7–130.0237%18 Jul →
anubis10–13-0.0025%17 Jul →
dust29–130.0141%17 Jul →
nuke5–13-0.0623%17 Jul →
cache5–13-0.0233%17 Jul →
inferno5–13-0.0145%17 Jul →
cache8–13-0.0431%17 Jul →
nuke13–5-0.0221%17 Jul →
inferno13–110.0232%13 Jul →
inferno13–80.1222%13 Jul →
poseidon9–60.0733%10 Jul →
inferno16–140.0623%6 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.