litl boi

litl boi — CS2 Stats

BS76561198154173665[U:1:193907937]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,703Tracked matches41%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.5 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating22,640Top 25% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#41876 of 219752 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,012 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 23 days played since 21 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,640 -1,721 21 Aug16 Sept · 11 days played
22,64024,361peak 24,36121 Aug16 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,012 +0 31 Aug7 Sept · 2 observations
1,0121,012peak 1,01231 Aug7 Sept
24,635Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,012Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
23Days played since 2026-08-21

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,012
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 39 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,721 below peak (24,361)
  • -1,721 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 2,360 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGlitl boiFACEITLevel 7 · 1,012 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER22,640 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,012csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim55
Positioning45
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD47485Last 10047%Win rateWLLLLLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +3.7pp headshot accuracy · +17ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 610ms

Last 10

  • 28 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 595ms

Last 20

  • 6131 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 586ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim5.5
Utility5.0
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels1.3
Clutch4.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 575ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 70% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.5
Positioning4.5
Utility5.0
Mechanics4.4
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact2.1

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time571ms+15ms
first ⅓ avg 556ms → last ⅓ avg 571ms
Headshot accuracy12.7%+4.1%
first ⅓ avg 8.6% → last ⅓ avg 12.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.08Best match rating · 8–2 · cache, 1 Sept
67%Best headshot accuracy · 13–0 · inferno, 31 Aug
359msFastest reaction time · 6–1 · mirage, 28 Aug
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 31 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
77In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 86% over 7ancientWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C25101540%-0.05
infernoB168850%-0.04
mirageC125742%-0.04
anubisC125742%-0.03
nukeA95456%-0.03
vertigoC94544%-0.02
cacheS76186%-0.02
ancientD62433%-0.07
overpass32167%-0.02
train1010%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

172Matches
63%Win rate
0.94Avg K/D
78.8ADR
35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust24657%0.9314.1
Mirage3850%0.9013.8
Ancient2560%0.9312.7
Inferno1984%0.9515.7
Nuke1776%1.0715.6
Anubis1567%0.9111.9
Overpass5100%1.1112.4
Cache450%0.7814.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.8%Headshot accuracy
34.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.4%Spray accuracy
69.6%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
575msReaction time
43.0%T opening success
34.1%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
2.0%Flash assists
10.34HE damage / grenade
4.68Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.7855% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 34.0937% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–10-0.0523%16 Sept
nuke3–9-0.0120%16 Sept
inferno8–13-0.0411%16 Sept
inferno1–13-0.0412%16 Sept
nuke8–130.0220%15 Sept
inferno1–13-0.0720%15 Sept
dust28–13-0.088%15 Sept
dust213–10-0.0314%14 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0210%14 Sept
anubis10–13-0.0314%12 Sept
dust211–13-0.0715%12 Sept
inferno12–12-0.0516%11 Sept
dust26–130.0028%11 Sept
mirage13–5-0.065%11 Sept
anubis13–8-0.067%10 Sept
vertigo13–80.0115%10 Sept
mirage13–40.0019%10 Sept
anubis0–4-0.050%10 Sept
dust211–13-0.084%9 Sept
ancient9–13-0.058%9 Sept
vertigo5–130.0118%9 Sept
dust27–13-0.0410%9 Sept
inferno13–6-0.0211%9 Sept
anubis10–13-0.0118%8 Sept
vertigo13–30.0615%8 Sept
cache13–7-0.0317%8 Sept
inferno3–13-0.048%8 Sept
mirage13–11-0.034%8 Sept
dust213–8-0.054%8 Sept
nuke13–6-0.0410%7 Sept
anubis8–13-0.0514%7 Sept
vertigo13–5-0.0215%7 Sept
inferno13–11-0.068%7 Sept
mirage11–13-0.059%7 Sept
dust212–12-0.0511%7 Sept
dust24–13-0.0718%6 Sept
anubis5–13-0.059%6 Sept
ancient9–13-0.0813%6 Sept
ancient13–7-0.0215%4 Sept
inferno13–7-0.0417%4 Sept
dust213–8-0.066%4 Sept
nuke6–13-0.0320%4 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0526%4 Sept
vertigo10–130.034%3 Sept
overpass4–13-0.0811%3 Sept
anubis13–11-0.0211%3 Sept
ancient8–13-0.1012%3 Sept
inferno12–12-0.0412%3 Sept
cache13–90.0313%3 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0211%3 Sept
dust211–2-0.048%3 Sept
dust213–10-0.1216%2 Sept
vertigo9–13-0.0716%2 Sept
vertigo10–13-0.059%1 Sept
ancient13–10-0.0219%1 Sept
anubis13–30.0519%1 Sept
cache8–20.0818%1 Sept
dust213–5-0.0112%1 Sept
mirage13–2-0.068%1 Sept
anubis9–13-0.075%1 Sept
cache13–6-0.0319%31 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0918%31 Aug
inferno13–0-0.0167%31 Aug
dust23–13-0.0210%29 Aug
nuke13–4-0.059%29 Aug
anubis13–2-0.018%29 Aug
overpass13–80.025%29 Aug
dust213–8-0.085%29 Aug
mirage0–5-0.080%29 Aug
nuke13–100.0113%28 Aug
mirage6–1-0.0318%28 Aug
vertigo13–3-0.1011%28 Aug
inferno4–13-0.110%28 Aug
dust24–13-0.077%28 Aug
dust210–13-0.074%28 Aug
dust25–13-0.0214%27 Aug
inferno6–6-0.100%27 Aug
inferno13–0-0.010%25 Aug
ancient1–2-0.140%25 Aug
dust27–13-0.069%25 Aug
mirage6–130.0210%25 Aug
overpass13–9-0.0117%25 Aug
cache11–13-0.087%25 Aug
cache13–10-0.1012%24 Aug
train12–12-0.0012%24 Aug
vertigo11–130.007%24 Aug
nuke13–11-0.047%24 Aug
anubis13–4-0.065%24 Aug
cache13–2-0.0210%24 Aug
inferno8–20.0010%24 Aug
dust213–4-0.0115%24 Aug
mirage12–12-0.0515%24 Aug
inferno6–130.0717%23 Aug
inferno16–14-0.038%22 Aug
dust24–13-0.0810%22 Aug
dust213–60.029%21 Aug
anubis0–13-0.0211%21 Aug
nuke13–11-0.057%21 Aug
dust28–13-0.046%21 Aug
dust26–13-0.0311%21 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →