Interior like fish eggs

Interior like fish eggs — CS2 Stats

AU76561198148386335[U:1:188120607]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,047Tracked matches30%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating18,061Purple band · top ~16.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#99397 of 229145 tracked
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 2,047 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 41 days played since 20 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,061 -520 20 May18 Sept · 33 days played
18,06120,754peak 20,75420 May18 Sept
20,970Peak Premier in tracked matches
41Days played since 2026-05-20

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,693 below peak (20,754)
  • -1,595 over 30 days · declining
  • -1,123 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 1,939 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-18
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-18

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGInterior like fish eggsFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER18,061 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim46
Positioning58
Utility75

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD40528Last 10040%Win rateLLLTLTLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −1.3pp headshot accuracy · +85ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 041 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 8%
  • Avg reaction 688ms

Last 10

  • 262 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 9%
  • Avg reaction 656ms

Last 20

  • 5123 · 25% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 613ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim4.6
Utility7.5
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels3.5

Strong T-side openerEffective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 61% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.83 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 60% on T to 36% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 624ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 70% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.6
Positioning5.8
Utility7.5
Mechanics4.4
Opening Duels4.5
Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time620ms−11ms
first ⅓ avg 631ms → last ⅓ avg 620ms
Headshot accuracy8.3%−1.4%
first ⅓ avg 9.7% → last ⅓ avg 8.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–5 · anubis, 20 May
20%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · mirage, 31 May
438msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · inferno, 25 Aug
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 8 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L3Current streak
118In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
18Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 62% over 26mirageWeakest map · 27% over 22
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA26161062%-0.02
mirageD2261627%-0.02
ancientD2271532%-0.04
anubisB157847%-0.01
overpassB63350%-0.05
dust241325%-0.05
cache4040%-0.04
office1010%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 22). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2Matches
50%Win rate
0.44Avg K/D
ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
1Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

8.5%Headshot accuracy
36.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.2%Spray accuracy
69.8%Counter-strafing
11.0°Preaim
624msReaction time
59.8%T opening success
35.8%CT opening success
0.83Enemies flashed / flash
4.9%Flash assists
14.05HE damage / grenade
18.82Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 8.4586% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 35.844% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 22 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage8–13-0.0515%18 Sept
mirage9–130.0210%18 Sept
ancient11–13-0.043%17 Sept
mirage15–15-0.0311%17 Sept
mirage5–130.012%17 Sept
anubis15–15-0.035%15 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0614%15 Sept
mirage13–20.0714%15 Sept
dust216–130.0310%11 Sept
anubis10–13-0.068%11 Sept
ancient6–13-0.057%11 Sept
cache4–13-0.0313%3 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0413%2 Sept
ancient9–13-0.068%2 Sept
anubis13–11-0.009%1 Sept
inferno15–15-0.0310%1 Sept
inferno13–11-0.0110%31 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0518%27 Aug
ancient13–6-0.004%27 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0211%25 Aug
inferno16–14-0.0210%25 Aug
anubis13–50.016%15 Aug
mirage5–130.044%15 Aug
anubis9–13-0.027%15 Aug
inferno11–13-0.048%13 Aug
anubis9–13-0.067%13 Aug
inferno13–9-0.038%13 Aug
cache9–13-0.045%11 Aug
mirage6–13-0.040%11 Aug
ancient2–13-0.043%11 Aug
mirage14–160.047%10 Aug
mirage5–13-0.045%10 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0514%10 Aug
mirage12–12-0.0011%5 Aug
mirage13–110.008%5 Aug
ancient13–11-0.060%3 Aug
inferno13–8-0.027%3 Aug
anubis13–70.037%30 Jul
inferno13–7-0.016%30 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0112%27 Jul
ancient13–9-0.047%27 Jul
ancient2–7-0.0617%27 Jul
inferno16–14-0.039%26 Jul
dust22–13-0.107%26 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0713%26 Jul
ancient14–16-0.028%26 Jul
ancient16–120.009%26 Jul
anubis13–8-0.0811%25 Jul
cache2–8-0.0512%25 Jul
dust23–130.019%25 Jul
mirage13–11-0.028%14 Jul
anubis16–140.0311%14 Jul
inferno13–70.0314%13 Jul
ancient6–13-0.016%13 Jul
mirage9–13-0.068%11 Jul
inferno13–3-0.0312%11 Jul
inferno13–10.1116%9 Jul
anubis11–130.0012%9 Jul
overpass2–13-0.0613%3 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0417%3 Jul
anubis7–13-0.065%3 Jul
inferno12–12-0.0610%30 Jun
cache12–12-0.0417%30 Jun
inferno13–60.039%29 Jun
anubis6–130.0218%29 Jun
overpass6–13-0.058%20 Jun
mirage13–90.049%15 Jun
inferno3–13-0.0513%15 Jun
ancient16–14-0.006%13 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0513%13 Jun
dust21–13-0.1317%13 Jun
anubis13–50.0112%13 Jun
inferno13–60.047%11 Jun
anubis13–16-0.069%11 Jun
ancient5–130.009%11 Jun
office8–130.0312%11 Jun
overpass13–40.0112%10 Jun
inferno12–16-0.0711%10 Jun
ancient2–13-0.102%10 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0514%9 Jun
ancient14–16-0.0512%9 Jun
ancient3–13-0.106%9 Jun
overpass13–9-0.064%8 Jun
inferno13–60.0113%8 Jun
ancient13–0-0.038%8 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0114%31 May
mirage8–13-0.0520%31 May
overpass8–13-0.095%31 May
inferno13–70.026%30 May
inferno2–13-0.035%30 May
ancient15–15-0.0313%30 May
overpass16–14-0.0512%30 May
inferno5–13-0.0311%30 May
inferno13–50.046%26 May
inferno13–40.0110%25 May
inferno13–9-0.096%24 May
ancient15–15-0.033%24 May
ancient14–16-0.046%21 May
ancient9–13-0.0313%21 May
anubis13–50.1111%20 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →