Technoc0p

Technoc0p — CS2 Stats

SE76561198147359152[U:1:187093424]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,230Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating9,888Light Blue band · top ~55.4% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 21 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 40 days played since 22 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 9,888 -5,186 22 Jul21 Sept · 38 days played
9,88815,074peak 15,07422 Jul21 Sept
Faceit ELO: 929 +0 4 Sept14 Sept · 3 observations
929929peak 9294 Sept14 Sept
15,074Peak Premier in tracked matches
929Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
40Days played since 2026-07-22

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 929
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 122 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-04
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-04

Premier CS Rating

  • 5,186 below peak (15,074)
  • -3,115 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 112 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-04
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-04

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTechnoc0pPREMIER9,888 · Light Blue bandPEAK ELO929csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning56
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD42571Last 10042%Win rateLLLWLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −60pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +9.9pp headshot accuracy · +30ms reaction

Win rate down 60pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 542ms

Last 10

  • 19 · 10% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 537ms

Last 20

  • 8111 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 522ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility4.6
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels5.2
Clutch2.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning5.6
Utility4.6
Mechanics5.6
Opening Duels5.6
Win Impact2.1

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time535ms−44ms
first ⅓ avg 579ms → last ⅓ avg 535ms
Headshot accuracy19.9%+2.2%
first ⅓ avg 17.7% → last ⅓ avg 19.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–6 · dust2, 14 Aug
43%Best headshot accuracy · 9–0 · cache, 14 Aug
391msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · ancient, 4 Sept
13–2Biggest win · dust2, 9 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L3Current streak
811In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 70% over 10infernoWeakest map · 13% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B189950%-0.01
infernoD1621413%-0.02
ancientC156940%0.00
anubisD134931%-0.01
mirageB136746%-0.03
nukeS107370%0.01
cacheA106460%0.01
vertigo31233%-0.07
overpass110100%0.01
train1010%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

471Matches
50%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
86.2ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust28844%1.0816.4
Ancient5163%1.2718.5
Mirage4549%1.1116.4
Nuke4243%1.0415.6
Inferno3247%1.0316.6
Cache2467%0.9314.8
Anubis2348%1.2516.4
Overpass40%0.6313.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.5%Headshot accuracy
33.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.3%Spray accuracy
75.2%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
529msReaction time
51.2%T opening success
53.8%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
7.5%Flash assists
8.43HE damage / grenade
5.70Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.481 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno11–13-0.0340%21 Sept
ancient7–13-0.0121%21 Sept
anubis12–16-0.0422%18 Sept
nuke13–6-0.019%16 Sept
cache11–13-0.0421%15 Sept
dust210–13-0.0729%12 Sept
dust24–13-0.0431%11 Sept
inferno5–130.0424%11 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0623%10 Sept
dust28–130.0835%10 Sept
anubis15–150.018%10 Sept
mirage13–100.0210%9 Sept
dust213–2-0.013%9 Sept
mirage13–11-0.0524%5 Sept
ancient6–13-0.0115%4 Sept
anubis13–16-0.0120%3 Sept
nuke13–2-0.0223%3 Sept
anubis13–100.0117%2 Sept
dust213–50.0423%2 Sept
ancient13–8-0.0213%2 Sept
anubis13–16-0.0015%1 Sept
dust21–4-0.090%1 Sept
inferno8–130.0520%31 Aug
ancient13–9-0.058%30 Aug
cache13–70.0612%30 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0237%29 Aug
anubis13–80.0216%29 Aug
dust210–13-0.0827%28 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0633%28 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0119%28 Aug
dust29–130.0326%28 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0619%27 Aug
dust213–11-0.0213%27 Aug
dust211–13-0.0323%26 Aug
vertigo17–19-0.0319%22 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0315%22 Aug
dust213–11-0.0118%22 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0616%22 Aug
mirage3–130.0115%21 Aug
nuke13–90.0023%20 Aug
cache13–30.0524%20 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0424%20 Aug
ancient8–130.0216%19 Aug
inferno9–130.0414%19 Aug
cache9–00.1043%14 Aug
nuke13–90.0318%14 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0322%14 Aug
dust213–60.1518%14 Aug
inferno13–60.0220%14 Aug
ancient11–130.1128%14 Aug
ancient10–130.0325%9 Aug
mirage13–2-0.0415%9 Aug
dust216–14-0.0114%8 Aug
anubis13–50.0218%8 Aug
nuke13–40.0421%8 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0422%7 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0619%7 Aug
dust23–13-0.098%7 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0113%7 Aug
dust211–130.0124%7 Aug
ancient7–130.0219%7 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0115%5 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0214%5 Aug
nuke13–60.0420%3 Aug
dust213–10-0.0318%2 Aug
nuke2–130.0228%1 Aug
anubis10–13-0.036%1 Aug
ancient13–3-0.0430%1 Aug
nuke13–40.0520%31 Jul
ancient13–100.098%31 Jul
ancient13–70.0220%30 Jul
anubis5–130.0131%30 Jul
dust213–60.0821%30 Jul
vertigo4–13-0.1022%29 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0716%29 Jul
cache11–130.0013%28 Jul
anubis14–16-0.039%28 Jul
overpass13–90.0116%26 Jul
dust24–13-0.108%25 Jul
cache9–13-0.0825%25 Jul
inferno10–13-0.1110%25 Jul
cache5–13-0.0527%25 Jul
cache13–10-0.0521%25 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0618%25 Jul
cache13–70.0514%25 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0523%25 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0410%25 Jul
mirage13–90.0119%25 Jul
anubis16–14-0.0519%25 Jul
cache13–90.0619%24 Jul
inferno2–13-0.0814%24 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0512%24 Jul
mirage9–130.0315%23 Jul
train9–130.0714%23 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0219%22 Jul
vertigo13–11-0.0811%22 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0327%22 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0020%22 Jul
inferno8–130.0317%22 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0516%22 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →