Drazer

Drazer — CS2 Stats

DE76561198146188855[U:1:185923127]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,707Tracked matches52%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.3 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating24,999Top 25% of 213,211 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#22565 of 259880 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,635 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Oct 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,999 +2,677 24 Jul – 30 Oct · 20 days played
22,32225,106peak 25,10624 Jul30 Oct
Faceit ELO: 2,635 +0 1 Sept – 12 Oct · 5 observations
2,6352,635peak 2,6351 Sept12 Oct
25,106Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,635Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
40Days played since 2026-07-24

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,635
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 — 365 to go
  • Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 107 below peak (25,106)
  • +626 over 30 days · improving
  • +859 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-10-12
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDrazerFACEITLevel 10 · 2,635 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER24,999 · Pink band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO2,635csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning76
Utility32

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–41–5Last 10054%Win rateWWLLWWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −3.0pp headshot accuracy · −17ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.03), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 503ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 511ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 520ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.6 against its own average).

Aim8.9
Utility3.2
Positioning7.6
Opening Duels5.9
Clutch3.4

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 69% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning7.6
Utility3.2
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels8.2
Win Impact5.6

Composite 7.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time523ms−36ms
first ⅓ avg 559ms → last ⅓ avg 523ms
Headshot accuracy17.2%−3.4%
first ⅓ avg 20.7% → last ⅓ avg 17.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating · 13–3 · dust2, 23 Oct →
43%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · ancient, 28 Aug →
367msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · ancient, 22 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 8 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
W2Current streak
7–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 69% over 13ancientWeakest map · 29% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisA2515–1060%0.04
cacheS1711–665%0.02
nukeB178–947%0.04
ancientD144–1029%0.02
dust2S139–469%0.05
infernoC73–443%0.02
mirage—32–167%-0.01
vertigo—21–150%0.00
boulder—11–0100%0.11
office—10–10%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

861Matches
53%Win rate
1.18Avg K/D
80.9ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient18756%1.1816.7
Dust215853%1.2016.9
Anubis13949%1.2317.4
Mirage12248%1.1116.5
Inferno9553%1.2616.9
Nuke6551%1.1117.0
Vertigo4260%1.2317.4
Overpass2442%1.0016.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.6%Headshot accuracy
42.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.6%Spray accuracy
83.1%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
531msReaction time
56.3%T opening success
69.2%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
5.1%Flash assists
6.02HE damage / grenade
2.61Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4719 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–60.0620%3 Nov →
mirage13–70.057%30 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.0214%30 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0219%30 Oct →
cache13–60.0519%29 Oct →
anubis13–70.0111%29 Oct →
nuke13–100.0123%26 Oct →
anubis13–70.0313%25 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0417%25 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0510%25 Oct →
nuke8–130.0914%25 Oct →
cache13–100.0116%25 Oct →
nuke10–130.0323%23 Oct →
inferno3–130.0234%23 Oct →
dust213–30.2221%23 Oct →
anubis7–130.0714%18 Oct →
cache13–90.0511%18 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0211%17 Oct →
anubis13–6-0.076%16 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0233%16 Oct →
cache13–80.0210%16 Oct →
inferno14–160.0316%16 Oct →
ancient11–130.0816%16 Oct →
anubis13–20.0317%16 Oct →
anubis11–130.0611%13 Oct →
cache12–120.0119%9 Oct →
inferno13–10.1617%8 Oct →
nuke13–80.0722%8 Oct →
cache13–40.0419%8 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0217%8 Oct →
anubis13–40.0815%7 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0128%7 Oct →
ancient13–30.0325%7 Oct →
nuke12–120.0318%6 Oct →
nuke6–120.0929%28 Sept →
dust211–130.0713%24 Sept →
dust21–13-0.0323%24 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0613%23 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0018%23 Sept →
nuke13–30.0820%23 Sept →
cache13–5-0.0116%23 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.0114%22 Sept →
dust213–80.0425%22 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.019%22 Sept →
nuke13–80.0228%22 Sept →
nuke13–90.0327%22 Sept →
anubis4–20.0814%18 Sept →
anubis12–120.0717%17 Sept →
nuke13–70.0825%17 Sept →
anubis13–90.0721%17 Sept →
anubis8–00.1922%17 Sept →
anubis1–13-0.049%17 Sept →
vertigo11–130.0215%12 Sept →
anubis13–20.0725%12 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0323%12 Sept →
dust213–40.0512%12 Sept →
dust213–60.0718%12 Sept →
anubis7–130.0515%11 Sept →
inferno13–30.0311%10 Sept →
anubis11–130.0617%9 Sept →
nuke13–110.0513%3 Sept →
cache7–130.0023%3 Sept →
cache13–70.0831%2 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0416%2 Sept →
cache7–10.0426%2 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0614%28 Aug →
ancient13–70.0822%28 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0421%28 Aug →
ancient3–110.0221%28 Aug →
dust211–130.0629%28 Aug →
anubis13–50.0117%28 Aug →
ancient3–13-0.0743%28 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0222%28 Aug →
ancient13–110.1324%25 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0117%25 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.0110%25 Aug →
cache13–110.0023%18 Aug →
dust213–50.0417%14 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0316%14 Aug →
cache13–110.0723%8 Aug →
nuke5–130.0025%7 Aug →
anubis6–30.0716%6 Aug →
boulder13–30.1111%4 Aug →
vertigo13–4-0.0128%4 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0018%1 Aug →
anubis11–130.0819%31 Jul →
ancient5–130.0123%31 Jul →
dust213–60.1121%30 Jul →
anubis13–70.0218%30 Jul →
dust216–140.0418%30 Jul →
anubis16–130.0916%30 Jul →
cache6–13-0.0633%30 Jul →
anubis13–20.0418%30 Jul →
cache13–20.1223%30 Jul →
inferno9–4-0.019%27 Jul →
office12–120.0026%25 Jul →
nuke15–150.1125%25 Jul →
ancient13–70.1323%25 Jul →
ancient3–130.0111%24 Jul →
cache5–130.0118%24 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.