Crookky

Crookky — CS2 Stats

76561198144753661[U:1:184487933]Steam profile ↗1 game ban

688Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,632Hours in CS4Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating26,799Top 5% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#6438 of 221408 tracked
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+273Premier CS Rating · 26,526 → 26,799
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 39 days played since 12 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,799 +1,800 12 Jun17 Sept · 32 days played
22,44826,799peak 26,79912 Jun17 Sept
26,799Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,071Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
39Days played since 2026-06-12

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,071
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 429 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 26,799
  • +2,181 over 30 days · improving
  • +2,551 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 3,201 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches70
Win rate71%
K/D1.00
Headshot %53%

Measured 9 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; previous 5 Sep 2026 → 9 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Red band among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,475), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerRed band medianGold band medianvs Gold band
Headshot rate40.3%49.2%50.3%10.0% short
Shot accuracy16.2%13.4%11.5%above
Kill/death ratio1.081.121.180.10 short
Match win rate44.0%48.5%51.9%7.9% short

This profile matches the typical Gold band player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Gold band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCrookkyPREMIER26,799 · Red bandPEAK ELO2,071csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning58
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT50491Last 10050%Win rateWWWWWLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −0.9pp headshot accuracy · −13ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 50 · 100% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 533ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 517ms

Last 20

  • 146 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 523ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim7.5
Utility5.0
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch5.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning5.8
Utility5.0
Mechanics5.3
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time541ms−30ms
first ⅓ avg 571ms → last ⅓ avg 541ms
Headshot accuracy23.3%+0.1%
first ⅓ avg 23.2% → last ⅓ avg 23.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 9–6 · debris, 18 Jul
56%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · anubis, 5 Jul
375msFastest reaction time · 15–15 · inferno, 23 Aug
13–2Biggest win · anubis, 25 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W5Current streak
67In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 67% over 12infernoWeakest map · 22% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA27171063%0.02
infernoD1841422%0.01
nukeS1711665%0.02
anubisC1661038%0.01
dust2S128467%-0.01
cache42250%-0.00
ancient41325%0.03
debris110100%0.20
overpass1010%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

82,164Lifetime kills
1.08K/D
4,399Matches
44.0%Match win rate
40.3%Headshot %
16.2%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Red band
10,030MVPs
1,516Hours (in match)
2,898Bombs planted
859Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4718,851
AWP11,402
SSG 082,879
SG 5532,688
AUG2,537
P902,349

Lifetime map wins

4,519dust2
3,678nuke
3,196inferno
1,764cbble
1,007train
935vertigo
611lake
316assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

303Matches
55%Win rate
1.18Avg K/D
84.0ADR
54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

45%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage9660%1.2417.2
Nuke6664%1.2417.6
Ancient4646%1.0517.0
Inferno2540%1.1116.1
Train1878%1.3719.3
Dust21331%0.8714.5
Anubis1250%0.9414.2
Overpass580%1.2517.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.9%Headshot accuracy
34.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.9%Spray accuracy
73.9%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
537msReaction time
29.4%T opening success
45.1%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
7.9%Flash assists
6.15HE damage / grenade
7.04Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.4067% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–9-0.0124%17 Sept
nuke9–30.0627%15 Sept
anubis13–90.0219%14 Sept
nuke13–50.0617%14 Sept
mirage13–7-0.0125%14 Sept
anubis11–13-0.0016%14 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0121%2 Sept
anubis11–130.0129%2 Sept
cache13–9-0.0819%2 Sept
dust213–100.0520%1 Sept
ancient13–70.0624%30 Aug
inferno11–130.0414%29 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0324%29 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0131%28 Aug
cache13–80.1431%28 Aug
dust213–8-0.0020%27 Aug
mirage13–70.1615%27 Aug
dust213–90.0428%27 Aug
nuke16–120.0023%26 Aug
mirage11–130.0114%25 Aug
cache9–13-0.0023%25 Aug
anubis13–20.050%25 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0322%25 Aug
inferno7–130.0029%24 Aug
mirage13–100.0325%24 Aug
nuke10–130.0229%24 Aug
inferno15–150.0220%23 Aug
anubis9–130.0121%23 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0141%22 Aug
nuke16–130.0125%21 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0944%21 Aug
mirage13–100.0428%15 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0123%14 Aug
ancient7–130.0023%14 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0126%9 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0632%9 Aug
dust27–13-0.0713%8 Aug
mirage13–90.0931%8 Aug
dust213–11-0.0337%8 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0133%2 Aug
cache4–13-0.0613%2 Aug
mirage7–130.0533%2 Aug
mirage13–90.0017%25 Jul
inferno13–60.0924%25 Jul
nuke9–130.0112%18 Jul
ancient4–130.0224%18 Jul
debris9–60.2012%18 Jul
ancient8–130.0515%18 Jul
dust213–9-0.0324%18 Jul
inferno13–110.0238%17 Jul
nuke13–50.0331%17 Jul
mirage13–100.0520%17 Jul
mirage13–60.0224%17 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0256%5 Jul
mirage13–90.0524%5 Jul
dust28–13-0.0315%4 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0124%4 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0143%4 Jul
dust213–50.0332%4 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0238%4 Jul
nuke13–50.0417%4 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0137%3 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0127%3 Jul
inferno10–130.0925%3 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0118%3 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0410%3 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0332%2 Jul
anubis13–110.0520%2 Jul
anubis12–16-0.0224%2 Jul
inferno13–50.0622%2 Jul
dust213–90.0020%2 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0116%30 Jun
nuke10–130.0340%30 Jun
dust213–8-0.0524%30 Jun
anubis6–130.0121%29 Jun
mirage13–60.0124%28 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0917%28 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0018%28 Jun
nuke13–40.0845%28 Jun
nuke13–70.0248%26 Jun
dust22–130.0134%24 Jun
anubis13–80.0221%24 Jun
anubis12–160.0123%23 Jun
anubis11–3-0.0419%23 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0527%23 Jun
nuke13–40.0317%23 Jun
overpass5–13-0.0328%22 Jun
anubis13–70.0725%22 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0520%21 Jun
mirage13–90.0418%21 Jun
inferno8–130.0925%21 Jun
nuke13–30.1222%21 Jun
nuke5–13-0.1218%20 Jun
mirage13–50.1324%14 Jun
mirage13–100.1524%14 Jun
inferno8–130.0017%13 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0110%13 Jun
dust27–13-0.0130%13 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0221%13 Jun
mirage16–14-0.064%12 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →