matupoiss

matupoiss — CS2 Stats

EE76561198144103958[U:1:183838230]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,138Tracked matches63%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating21,117Top 50% of 185,711 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#62128 of 232722 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 1,220 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 6 Sep 2026 (14 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 29 days played since 27 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,117 +2,233 27 Jul6 Sept · 25 days played
18,88422,816peak 22,81627 Jul6 Sept
22,816Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,220Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
29Days played since 2026-07-27

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,220
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 131 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,699 below peak (22,816)
  • +732 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 3,883 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmatupoissFACEITLevel 10 · 1,220 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER21,117 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,220csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning54
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT51454Last 10051%Win rateWWWLWWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +2.2pp headshot accuracy · −8ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 563ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 579ms

Last 20

  • 128 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 583ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim7.5
Utility6.1
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels4.1
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning5.4
Utility6.1
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels3.4
Win Impact9.4

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time565ms−81ms
first ⅓ avg 647ms → last ⅓ avg 565ms
Headshot accuracy22.0%+1.7%
first ⅓ avg 20.3% → last ⅓ avg 22.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 9–6 · debris, 31 Aug
36%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · nuke, 30 Aug
422msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · nuke, 24 Aug
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 9 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W3Current streak
43In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 83% over 6dust2Weakest map · 40% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB27141352%0.01
nukeA1810856%0.00
dust2C156940%-0.00
infernoB147750%0.00
cacheB137654%0.01
ancientS65183%0.02
anubis41325%-0.01
poseidon1010%-0.02
debris110100%0.13
vertigo1010%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

181Matches
61%Win rate
1.18Avg K/D
73.3ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5768%1.3315.4
Dust22152%1.1215.8
Nuke2060%1.1614.2
Anubis1856%0.9312.9
Ancient1164%0.9212.4
Inferno1173%1.4316.6
Overpass425%0.8113.0
Cache4100%1.7616.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.9%Headshot accuracy
33.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.2%Spray accuracy
80.1%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
544msReaction time
33.9%T opening success
52.9%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
7.5%Flash assists
8.26HE damage / grenade
14.38Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4532 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.9107% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–110.0514%10 Sept
inferno13–10.1123%9 Sept
cache13–100.0120%7 Sept
nuke9–13-0.0515%7 Sept
inferno13–10-0.0325%6 Sept
cache13–60.1027%6 Sept
dust211–13-0.0826%6 Sept
nuke4–13-0.0428%6 Sept
mirage13–60.1023%6 Sept
ancient13–10-0.0419%5 Sept
mirage13–80.0331%3 Sept
cache9–13-0.0522%3 Sept
cache0–6-0.0913%2 Sept
inferno13–6-0.0412%2 Sept
nuke13–10-0.0323%2 Sept
mirage1–130.1021%2 Sept
inferno4–13-0.077%1 Sept
dust213–7-0.0120%1 Sept
poseidon6–9-0.0227%31 Aug
debris9–60.1321%31 Aug
nuke8–8-0.0414%31 Aug
inferno6–90.0230%31 Aug
cache10–130.0026%31 Aug
anubis9–130.0117%30 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0336%30 Aug
inferno13–50.1017%30 Aug
ancient13–100.0425%30 Aug
mirage13–110.0431%30 Aug
ancient13–70.0327%30 Aug
cache13–90.0422%30 Aug
dust28–13-0.0520%29 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0126%29 Aug
ancient13–90.0120%29 Aug
mirage13–100.0116%29 Aug
inferno13–60.0522%29 Aug
dust27–13-0.0019%28 Aug
cache3–13-0.0425%28 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0124%28 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0312%28 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0127%28 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0215%26 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0229%25 Aug
cache13–40.0818%25 Aug
dust28–130.0122%24 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0516%24 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0230%23 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0025%23 Aug
inferno16–14-0.0419%21 Aug
mirage13–50.0316%21 Aug
anubis16–120.048%21 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0119%20 Aug
mirage15–150.0321%18 Aug
nuke13–100.0115%18 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0416%18 Aug
cache13–10.0221%18 Aug
nuke13–70.0326%17 Aug
dust213–30.1126%17 Aug
mirage13–70.0224%17 Aug
vertigo12–120.0517%14 Aug
mirage13–90.1134%14 Aug
inferno13–110.0530%13 Aug
dust26–13-0.0117%13 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0316%13 Aug
mirage13–16-0.0222%12 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0332%12 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0117%3 Aug
mirage11–130.0016%3 Aug
mirage13–16-0.0318%3 Aug
mirage9–130.0623%3 Aug
dust213–70.0223%3 Aug
inferno1–13-0.1015%3 Aug
mirage13–80.0225%3 Aug
mirage13–90.0311%2 Aug
mirage0–10-0.0218%2 Aug
mirage9–130.0134%2 Aug
cache13–70.0112%31 Jul
inferno9–130.0416%31 Jul
dust23–13-0.0635%31 Jul
mirage13–90.0225%31 Jul
dust27–130.0319%30 Jul
nuke13–90.0215%30 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0421%30 Jul
dust22–130.0017%30 Jul
cache15–15-0.0319%30 Jul
mirage13–60.0226%30 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0423%28 Jul
nuke13–20.1015%28 Jul
dust213–50.0816%28 Jul
nuke13–30.1130%28 Jul
dust213–10-0.0311%28 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0110%28 Jul
inferno6–130.0222%28 Jul
ancient13–40.1022%28 Jul
cache13–60.0319%28 Jul
nuke13–80.0731%28 Jul
inferno0–6-0.068%27 Jul
dust24–13-0.0624%27 Jul
cache5–130.0229%27 Jul
mirage12–16-0.0122%27 Jul
dust213–30.0415%27 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →