lcS;1 — CS2 Stats

76561198143790880[U:1:183525152]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,492Tracked matches83%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.4 SolidHybrid Rifler

CSDB Leaderboard#19605 of 22262 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,334 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

2,334Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB

1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

At peak — 2,334
Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 166 to go
Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
Level 10 first seen 2026-08-28
Level 9 first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80

Positioning40

Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT74–15–11Last 10074%Win rateWLWWWWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.0

Aggression5.1

Utility5.7

Positioning4.0

Opening Duels1.0

Clutch5.0

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.82 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 40 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 659ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0

Positioning4.0

Utility5.7

Mechanics7.8

Opening Duels1.9

Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.04

Reaction time671ms+30ms

first ⅓ avg 641ms → last ⅓ avg 671ms

Headshot accuracy25.8%−0.2%

first ⅓ avg 26.0% → last ⅓ avg 25.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.53Best rating — cache 2–1

13–0Biggest win — train

11Longest win streak

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 100% over 6dust2Weakest map · 63% over 35

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	A	35	22–13	63%	0.01
mirage	S	28	19–9	68%	0.01
cache	S	14	12–2	86%	0.08
nuke	S	6	5–1	83%	0.02
anubis	S	6	6–0	100%	0.01
vertigo	S	5	4–1	80%	0.06
train	—	2	2–0	100%	0.07
inferno	—	2	2–0	100%	0.04
ancient	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.05
overpass	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (63% over 35). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,798Matches

67%Win rate

1.41Avg K/D

77.2ADR

51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

45%1v1 clutch win

25%1v2 clutch win

40Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	207	48%	1.01	15.6
Dust2	123	54%	1.12	16.0
Anubis	70	50%	1.09	15.8
Ancient	35	60%	1.12	15.9
Nuke	26	42%	1.23	16.4
Cache	19	68%	1.05	14.9
Vertigo	18	56%	1.13	17.4
Inferno	16	50%	0.95	13.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.1%Headshot accuracy

38.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

39.5%Spray accuracy

84.9%Counter-strafing

10.7°Preaim

659msReaction time

22.7%T opening success

45.3%CT opening success

0.82Enemies flashed / flash

5.8%Flash assists

10.61HE damage / grenade

6.49Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 22.7035% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	13–6	0.04	40%	23 Aug →
cache	2–1	0.53	53%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–1	-0.04	15%	12 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.00	24%	12 Aug →
train	13–0	0.07	14%	12 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.01	17%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.00	26%	8 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.06	14%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–0	0.09	42%	6 Aug →
anubis	13–7	-0.05	27%	5 Aug →
inferno	13–1	0.08	30%	5 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.12	22%	5 Aug →
vertigo	13–1	0.17	35%	3 Aug →
mirage	6–1	0.02	11%	3 Aug →
vertigo	13–0	0.03	13%	3 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.01	27%	3 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.06	17%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.07	27%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–0	0.06	33%	2 Aug →
nuke	10–1	-0.02	47%	1 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.01	11%	1 Aug →
vertigo	3–0	-0.05	0%	1 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.03	31%	31 Jul →
dust2	13–10	-0.00	38%	31 Jul →
cache	13–3	0.05	26%	31 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.01	23%	30 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.07	24%	30 Jul →
dust2	13–4	-0.00	25%	30 Jul →
vertigo	11–13	0.00	26%	30 Jul →
nuke	13–8	-0.01	20%	30 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.02	29%	29 Jul →
cache	13–1	0.09	39%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.05	26%	28 Jul →
anubis	13–8	0.06	32%	28 Jul →
nuke	13–2	0.04	32%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.14	20%	28 Jul →
dust2	11–8	-0.01	25%	28 Jul →
anubis	13–0	0.04	55%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–4	-0.01	15%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–3	-0.02	13%	27 Jul →
ancient	9–4	-0.05	17%	26 Jul →
dust2	12–12	0.06	33%	26 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.05	25%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–1	0.02	40%	23 Jul →
cache	4–0	-0.02	40%	23 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.03	33%	22 Jul →
dust2	13–6	-0.04	24%	22 Jul →
anubis	13–7	0.02	12%	20 Jul →
dust2	7–1	0.05	26%	20 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.05	16%	20 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.11	21%	16 Jul →
overpass	13–7	-0.01	36%	16 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.02	24%	16 Jul →
mirage	12–12	-0.08	19%	13 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.06	30%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.02	28%	13 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.08	35%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–5	-0.07	17%	12 Jul →
cache	13–1	0.05	36%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.06	32%	12 Jul →
cache	13–1	-0.01	21%	11 Jul →
dust2	12–12	0.04	39%	11 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.01	17%	11 Jul →
nuke	12–12	0.05	29%	11 Jul →
mirage	13–5	-0.01	43%	11 Jul →
dust2	13–10	-0.10	22%	10 Jul →
dust2	13–4	-0.07	17%	10 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.02	52%	10 Jul →
train	13–1	0.08	43%	10 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.01	11%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.03	8%	10 Jul →
dust2	6–13	0.02	29%	9 Jul →
mirage	4–13	0.00	20%	9 Jul →
mirage	12–12	-0.05	28%	9 Jul →
mirage	12–12	-0.06	10%	7 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.10	22%	7 Jul →
dust2	12–12	0.12	30%	7 Jul →
cache	12–12	0.06	31%	6 Jul →
anubis	13–10	-0.03	34%	6 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.01	32%	6 Jul →
mirage	12–12	0.01	20%	6 Jul →
cache	13–1	-0.00	41%	6 Jul →
mirage	3–9	-0.11	14%	6 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.01	55%	5 Jul →
vertigo	13–2	0.14	37%	5 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.08	22%	5 Jul →
dust2	13–2	-0.01	23%	4 Jul →
dust2	13–10	-0.04	16%	4 Jul →
dust2	13–2	-0.04	12%	4 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.10	28%	4 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.04	22%	4 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.08	43%	4 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.05	11%	1 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.02	36%	1 Jul →
dust2	12–12	0.03	28%	30 Jun →
cache	13–0	0.10	13%	30 Jun →
dust2	13–3	-0.02	6%	30 Jun →
mirage	13–6	0.07	18%	30 Jun →
anubis	13–5	0.03	34%	30 Jun →
dust2	12–12	0.04	26%	30 Jun →