varjo_ankka

varjo_ankka — CS2 Stats

76561198143465499[U:1:183199771]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,477Tracked matches46%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating21,647Top 50% of 204,219 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#58672 of 251356 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,551 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 9 Oct 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,647 -946 27 Aug – 9 Oct · 22 days played
20,74522,593peak 22,59327 Aug9 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,551 +0 21 Sept – 26 Sept · 4 observations
1,5511,551peak 1,55121 Sept26 Sept
22,593Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,551Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
24Days played since 2026-08-27

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,551
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 200 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-21
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-21

Premier CS Rating

  • 946 below peak (22,593)
  • +467 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,353 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-21
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-21

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGvarjo_ankkaFACEITLevel 9 · 1,551 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER21,647 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,551csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim45
Positioning48
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD48–48–4Last 10048%Win rateTLWLLWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · −6.9pp headshot accuracy · −61ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–3–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 681ms

Last 10

  • 3–6–1 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 646ms

Last 20

  • 8–10–2 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 677ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim4.5
Utility4.1
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels0.1
Clutch1.8

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 661ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.5
Positioning4.8
Utility4.1
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels1.0
Win Impact3.8

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time642ms+77ms
first ⅓ avg 565ms → last ⅓ avg 642ms
Headshot accuracy17.1%−3.4%
first ⅓ avg 20.5% → last ⅓ avg 17.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–4 · ancient, 4 Oct →
75%Best headshot accuracy · 0–13 · nuke, 30 Aug →
328msFastest reaction time · 2–8 · nuke, 12 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 19 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

10Longest win streak
8–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 15anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeC2310–1343%-0.03
infernoA2012–860%-0.00
dust2B179–853%-0.02
cacheS1510–567%-0.00
ancientC104–640%0.01
mirageD82–625%-0.02
anubisD51–420%-0.03
overpass—20–20%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

840Matches
52%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
75.8ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

29%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno6757%1.1416.2
Nuke5054%1.0116.1
Anubis2646%1.1217.0
Mirage2642%1.0015.5
Dust22259%1.0013.3
Ancient2030%1.0016.4
Cache1872%1.0714.4
Overpass1173%1.3518.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.9%Headshot accuracy
32.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.1%Spray accuracy
82.6%Counter-strafing
14.0°Preaim
661msReaction time
38.1%T opening success
29.7%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
9.6%Flash assists
6.56HE damage / grenade
4.79Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 13.9811° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient12–120.0228%10 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.118%9 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0910%9 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0820%9 Oct →
overpass6–13-0.0233%9 Oct →
cache6–00.140%9 Oct →
inferno13–3-0.0713%9 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.048%9 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.044%8 Oct →
inferno2–13-0.0430%8 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0815%6 Oct →
nuke12–120.0116%6 Oct →
dust210–130.0020%4 Oct →
nuke13–80.037%4 Oct →
ancient13–40.1728%4 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0321%4 Oct →
cache13–2-0.0347%4 Oct →
dust213–6-0.0419%4 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.0240%4 Oct →
ancient13–80.0211%3 Oct →
nuke13–30.1024%3 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.0222%3 Oct →
cache13–30.0215%3 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0517%3 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.014%3 Oct →
cache1–13-0.0725%3 Oct →
inferno9–130.0315%3 Oct →
dust213–4-0.036%3 Oct →
ancient1–12-0.0514%3 Oct →
nuke13–90.0517%3 Oct →
nuke16–12-0.0416%3 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.015%3 Oct →
inferno7–120.128%3 Oct →
ancient13–90.0117%2 Oct →
dust213–110.0114%2 Oct →
nuke13–5-0.0110%1 Oct →
dust214–16-0.0123%1 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0414%1 Oct →
dust216–13-0.0413%1 Oct →
mirage1–13-0.0821%1 Oct →
ancient13–16-0.0415%30 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0516%30 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0717%30 Sept →
cache10–130.0412%30 Sept →
nuke16–140.0115%29 Sept →
cache13–6-0.0512%29 Sept →
inferno13–70.0417%29 Sept →
inferno16–14-0.0211%29 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0512%29 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0422%28 Sept →
ancient13–80.0115%28 Sept →
nuke13–90.022%28 Sept →
cache16–12-0.0525%28 Sept →
dust213–3-0.0710%28 Sept →
dust211–13-0.058%27 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.0331%27 Sept →
dust211–13-0.058%27 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.084%27 Sept →
dust23–13-0.137%27 Sept →
anubis13–9-0.073%27 Sept →
cache13–5-0.0822%27 Sept →
nuke15–15-0.0519%27 Sept →
mirage6–130.0413%25 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0316%25 Sept →
inferno8–130.0013%25 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0310%23 Sept →
mirage13–40.0214%23 Sept →
cache13–100.0012%23 Sept →
dust213–60.0125%19 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.0017%19 Sept →
dust213–80.0311%19 Sept →
dust213–10.1319%19 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0117%19 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0419%19 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0017%19 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0534%18 Sept →
ancient11–130.0026%18 Sept →
inferno13–40.0824%18 Sept →
ancient14–16-0.0515%18 Sept →
inferno13–5-0.0522%18 Sept →
nuke9–130.0115%18 Sept →
cache13–110.0113%18 Sept →
mirage0–3-0.0050%16 Sept →
nuke2–8-0.080%12 Sept →
inferno13–80.0610%2 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0512%2 Sept →
mirage8–130.0317%1 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.069%1 Sept →
anubis12–16-0.0119%31 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0215%31 Aug →
overpass12–12-0.0528%30 Aug →
cache13–90.0122%30 Aug →
inferno13–20.0019%30 Aug →
inferno13–40.0324%30 Aug →
mirage1–3-0.050%30 Aug →
nuke0–13-0.0575%30 Aug →
dust21–130.0424%28 Aug →
cache10–130.0718%28 Aug →
nuke4–13-0.0633%27 Aug →
nuke13–10-0.0116%27 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches10-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.