jms

jms — CS2 Stats

BT76561198142845514[U:1:182579786]Steam profile ↗

2,265Tracked matches72%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.5 StrongHybrid Rifler
CSDB Leaderboard#31411 of 34908 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

2,103Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,103
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 397 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGjmsPEAK ELO2,103csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning58
Utility68

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT64306Last 10064%Win rateWWWWWLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.9
Aggression5.8
Utility6.8
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch3.2

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 97% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 91% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.6° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 562ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning5.8
Utility6.8
Mechanics9.1
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.5/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time575ms+11ms
first ⅓ avg 564ms → last ⅓ avg 575ms
Headshot accuracy26.1%+6.6%
first ⅓ avg 19.5% → last ⅓ avg 26.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — inferno 13–2
131Biggest win — mirage
9Longest win streak
W5Current streak
86In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 75% over 8nukeWeakest map · 56% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisA2113862%0.01
mirageS2013765%0.03
infernoA148657%0.02
ancientA138562%0.02
dust2S128467%0.04
nukeA95456%0.01
cacheS86275%0.01
overpass220100%0.03
boulder110100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (56% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

610Matches
55%Win rate
1.14Avg K/D
82.3ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4652%1.0415.7
Ancient3962%1.2116.7
Anubis3241%1.1616.1
Nuke1662%1.1716.6
Dust21547%1.0713.7
Inferno633%0.7912.3
Vertigo367%1.1319.0
Cache3100%1.0313.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.4%Headshot accuracy
38.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.4%Spray accuracy
90.9%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
562msReaction time
31.9%T opening success
48.4%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
10.9%Flash assists
11.12HE damage / grenade
9.57Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.8634% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–90.0917%27 Aug
cache13–9-0.0511%27 Aug
cache13–11-0.0617%26 Aug
mirage13–100.0232%25 Aug
dust213–80.0525%24 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0216%24 Aug
cache13–40.0426%23 Aug
inferno13–2-0.0231%23 Aug
mirage13–60.0732%23 Aug
dust213–80.0220%20 Aug
dust213–100.0416%20 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0323%18 Aug
nuke13–40.0236%13 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0345%13 Aug
mirage13–90.0723%13 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0221%13 Aug
anubis9–130.0229%13 Aug
inferno13–20.1423%11 Aug
mirage12–120.0920%11 Aug
anubis12–160.0233%11 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0124%10 Aug
dust213–70.1141%10 Aug
ancient13–80.0223%10 Aug
mirage13–10.0122%10 Aug
inferno6–130.0416%9 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0128%6 Aug
ancient16–14-0.0331%6 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0432%5 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0230%4 Aug
dust213–60.1018%3 Aug
mirage13–40.0935%3 Aug
mirage13–90.1030%3 Aug
ancient3–130.0131%3 Aug
nuke6–0-0.0220%2 Aug
dust213–60.1019%1 Aug
ancient13–80.0119%1 Aug
nuke10–130.0220%1 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0331%30 Jul
anubis13–40.0720%28 Jul
ancient13–40.1420%28 Jul
dust29–13-0.0223%26 Jul
cache12–120.0917%23 Jul
anubis13–7-0.0336%23 Jul
ancient11–130.0122%22 Jul
cache13–5-0.0027%22 Jul
inferno13–5-0.0125%22 Jul
mirage10–130.0119%21 Jul
mirage16–130.1322%21 Jul
ancient16–140.0624%19 Jul
nuke13–6-0.0112%18 Jul
cache13–60.0719%18 Jul
inferno13–40.0114%17 Jul
cache13–7-0.0116%17 Jul
nuke12–120.0221%16 Jul
anubis4–130.0237%16 Jul
anubis13–30.1135%15 Jul
nuke11–130.0022%14 Jul
anubis13–3-0.0116%13 Jul
cache11–130.0222%13 Jul
dust28–13-0.0313%13 Jul
boulder13–70.0423%12 Jul
mirage13–40.0113%12 Jul
mirage13–100.0322%12 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0118%8 Jul
mirage13–70.0215%6 Jul
anubis2–13-0.0114%6 Jul
ancient13–110.019%5 Jul
anubis13–70.0222%4 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0316%3 Jul
nuke13–60.0425%30 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0218%30 Jun
ancient16–120.0414%28 Jun
overpass13–8-0.0111%27 Jun
mirage10–130.0225%27 Jun
anubis13–90.0623%27 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0918%27 Jun
dust23–13-0.0113%27 Jun
anubis13–110.0010%24 Jun
ancient6–130.0122%24 Jun
anubis13–160.0317%24 Jun
anubis13–30.0319%24 Jun
anubis13–60.0117%23 Jun
ancient2–13-0.0220%22 Jun
anubis13–110.0114%22 Jun
inferno15–15-0.0122%18 Jun
dust28–130.0728%17 Jun
mirage12–120.0517%17 Jun
inferno13–90.0333%16 Jun
overpass13–50.0716%16 Jun
inferno13–70.0418%15 Jun
anubis13–70.0521%15 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0110%15 Jun
inferno5–130.1033%14 Jun
ancient13–110.0119%14 Jun
anubis12–12-0.0320%13 Jun
inferno13–9-0.0115%13 Jun
inferno13–4-0.0015%12 Jun
dust213–8-0.0329%11 Jun
mirage13–60.1026%11 Jun
nuke13–9-0.0116%10 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →