Hunter Biden — CS2 Stats

IL76561198142103129[U:1:181837401]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,810Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingPassive Rifler

Premier CS Rating21,333Top 50% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#13059 of 40726 tracked

WingmanMaster Guardian II

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61

Positioning46

Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–43–9Last 10048%Win rateLLWLWWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.1

Aggression4.3

Utility4.2

Positioning4.6

Opening Duels1.1

Clutch3.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 555ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1

Positioning4.6

Utility4.2

Mechanics4.3

Opening Duels1.1

Win Impact7.2

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time551ms−48ms

first ⅓ avg 599ms → last ⅓ avg 551ms

Headshot accuracy16.9%+1.3%

first ⅓ avg 15.6% → last ⅓ avg 16.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — vertigo 13–1

13–1Biggest win — vertigo

6Longest win streak

L2Current streak

12–13In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

12Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 80% over 5mirageWeakest map · 20% over 5

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
ancient	B	23	12–11	52%	-0.02
inferno	A	20	12–8	60%	-0.01
nuke	A	16	9–7	56%	-0.00
anubis	D	12	3–9	25%	-0.03
cache	C	11	4–7	36%	-0.03
mirage	D	5	1–4	20%	-0.02
vertigo	S	5	4–1	80%	0.05
office	—	4	2–2	50%	0.01
dust2	—	4	1–3	25%	-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

64Matches

53%Win rate

0.83Avg K/D

68.1ADR

47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win

22%1v2 clutch win

8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Ancient	15	60%	0.84	12.8
Inferno	15	47%	0.84	12.6
Anubis	12	67%	0.89	14.3
Nuke	9	44%	0.75	11.3
Vertigo	6	67%	0.83	11.3
Mirage	5	40%	0.79	15.6
Dust2	2	0%	0.86	13.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.9%Headshot accuracy

34.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.8%Spray accuracy

69.2%Counter-strafing

10.4°Preaim

555msReaction time

33.6%T opening success

35.1%CT opening success

0.45Enemies flashed / flash

2.8%Flash assists

9.21HE damage / grenade

4.99Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4518 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 33.6469% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
nuke	6–13	-0.04	14%	28 Aug →
anubis	5–13	-0.06	14%	28 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.05	10%	28 Aug →
anubis	8–13	-0.03	26%	26 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.03	29%	26 Aug →
nuke	13–2	0.06	24%	22 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.01	7%	22 Aug →
inferno	7–0	0.03	10%	22 Aug →
office	8–13	-0.05	15%	21 Aug →
ancient	13–7	-0.03	9%	21 Aug →
inferno	13–9	-0.04	14%	20 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.01	13%	20 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.03	22%	19 Aug →
office	13–5	0.09	28%	18 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.02	17%	17 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.05	11%	16 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.02	16%	14 Aug →
inferno	13–2	0.04	26%	14 Aug →
cache	16–14	-0.02	9%	12 Aug →
office	13–10	0.04	16%	10 Aug →
mirage	16–14	-0.02	13%	9 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.08	9%	9 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.02	19%	9 Aug →
nuke	13–4	0.05	22%	9 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.04	18%	9 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.05	25%	8 Aug →
ancient	13–16	-0.02	25%	8 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.01	24%	8 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.08	12%	8 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.05	9%	7 Aug →
inferno	13–7	-0.06	12%	7 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.04	19%	7 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.06	22%	6 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.04	13%	4 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.03	15%	4 Aug →
nuke	16–14	-0.05	15%	4 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.01	8%	3 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.07	20%	2 Aug →
nuke	13–2	-0.01	11%	2 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.00	15%	2 Aug →
vertigo	12–12	0.09	16%	31 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.02	19%	29 Jul →
ancient	15–15	-0.03	4%	29 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.01	16%	28 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.01	6%	28 Jul →
inferno	5–9	-0.13	9%	28 Jul →
dust2	15–15	-0.07	12%	27 Jul →
cache	13–7	-0.03	15%	27 Jul →
ancient	7–2	0.05	18%	27 Jul →
inferno	13–2	0.04	29%	27 Jul →
vertigo	13–8	0.01	10%	24 Jul →
cache	13–9	-0.02	17%	24 Jul →
office	3–13	-0.04	10%	24 Jul →
ancient	1–13	-0.10	15%	24 Jul →
cache	4–13	-0.03	9%	24 Jul →
nuke	13–5	-0.01	12%	24 Jul →
nuke	13–11	-0.02	14%	22 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.07	29%	22 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.05	15%	22 Jul →
dust2	15–15	-0.02	14%	21 Jul →
cache	7–13	0.03	23%	20 Jul →
inferno	13–11	-0.03	21%	20 Jul →
inferno	10–13	-0.02	17%	17 Jul →
cache	13–6	-0.05	14%	17 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.04	11%	17 Jul →
mirage	15–15	0.01	6%	16 Jul →
inferno	11–13	-0.02	17%	15 Jul →
anubis	11–13	-0.06	16%	15 Jul →
inferno	8–8	-0.05	9%	15 Jul →
cache	2–13	-0.07	19%	14 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.04	14%	10 Jul →
inferno	13–11	-0.03	21%	9 Jul →
vertigo	13–8	-0.02	13%	8 Jul →
anubis	7–13	-0.00	18%	6 Jul →
nuke	15–15	-0.02	10%	6 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.00	19%	2 Jul →
anubis	5–13	-0.04	12%	17 Jun →
inferno	13–11	-0.01	23%	16 Jun →
ancient	13–8	0.00	18%	14 Jun →
anubis	1–13	-0.08	13%	12 Jun →
anubis	2–13	-0.06	22%	8 Jun →
nuke	15–15	-0.02	13%	8 Jun →
ancient	13–11	-0.08	18%	6 Jun →
nuke	13–8	0.01	11%	6 Jun →
nuke	10–13	0.03	9%	6 Jun →
anubis	15–15	-0.01	10%	5 Jun →
ancient	13–8	-0.04	11%	5 Jun →
nuke	9–13	-0.05	11%	5 Jun →
vertigo	13–11	0.01	16%	5 Jun →
anubis	13–10	-0.02	20%	4 Jun →
ancient	13–6	-0.00	17%	4 Jun →
inferno	13–6	0.04	15%	4 Jun →
ancient	13–6	0.02	17%	4 Jun →
vertigo	13–1	0.15	23%	4 Jun →
ancient	14–16	0.03	19%	3 Jun →
inferno	13–7	0.01	17%	3 Jun →
inferno	13–4	0.01	24%	3 Jun →
mirage	11–13	-0.04	5%	2 Jun →
anubis	0–13	-0.05	20%	2 Jun →
ancient	4–13	-0.08	16%	2 Jun →