CMJ — CS2 Stats

Performance scores

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+0.9 against its own average).

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

Map breakdown

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	C	20	8–12	40%	0.02
dust2	C	11	4–7	36%	-0.02
nuke	B	10	5–5	50%	0.00
ancient	A	9	5–4	56%	0.02
overpass	B	8	4–4	50%	-0.00
inferno	D	8	2–6	25%	0.01
train	C	7	3–4	43%	-0.00
anubis	D	6	2–4	33%	-0.00
office	A	5	3–2	60%	-0.01
italy	—	4	1–3	25%	0.00
cache	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.06
grail	—	3	3–0	100%	-0.02
vertigo	—	3	2–1	67%	0.02
alpine	—	1	1–0	100%	0.00
agency	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.02
basalt	—	1	0–1	0%	0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

Milestones