Knoxjq

Knoxjq — CS2 Stats

76561198135648169[U:1:175382441]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,350Tracked matches50%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,133 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKnoxjqFACEITLevel 6 · 1,133 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning62
Utility37

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD48–52Last 10048%Win rateLLWLWLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +2.3pp headshot accuracy · +36ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 609ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 635ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 616ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility3.7
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels4.6
Clutch3.0

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 74% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 74% on T to 51% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 605ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning6.2
Utility3.7
Mechanics5.6
Opening Duels7.7
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time609ms−45ms
first ⅓ avg 654ms → last ⅓ avg 609ms
Headshot accuracy23.6%−2.1%
first ⅓ avg 25.7% → last ⅓ avg 23.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–6 · nuke, 19 Jun →
62%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · nuke, 10 Jun →
422msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · inferno, 19 Oct →
13–3Biggest win · nuke, 13 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

10Longest win streak
L2Current streak
10–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 56% over 18ancientWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2714–1352%-0.01
infernoC188–1044%-0.01
nukeA1810–856%0.02
cacheC145–936%-0.02
mirageA116–555%0.00
ancientD93–633%-0.02
anubis—11–0100%-0.00
vertigo—11–0100%0.09
overpass—10–10%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

801Matches
47%Win rate
0.99Avg K/D
80.4ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust211348%0.9317.0
Nuke6758%1.1117.0
Inferno5850%0.9615.6
Mirage5242%0.9518.1
Cache2829%0.9115.1
Ancient2540%0.8215.6
Anubis1145%0.7912.4
Overpass922%0.8317.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.4%Headshot accuracy
43.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.1%Spray accuracy
75.1%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
605msReaction time
73.5%T opening success
51.3%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
6.2%Flash assists
6.04HE damage / grenade
4.97Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno7–13-0.0316%6 Nov →
mirage5–13-0.0435%6 Nov →
dust213–70.0128%6 Nov →
mirage9–13-0.0226%5 Nov →
dust219–160.0018%3 Nov →
cache8–130.0324%3 Nov →
cache3–13-0.0223%3 Nov →
dust24–130.0233%30 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.1012%23 Oct →
dust213–60.0633%23 Oct →
dust213–80.1128%23 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0929%22 Oct →
cache13–9-0.0121%22 Oct →
inferno6–130.0125%20 Oct →
nuke7–130.0333%20 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0712%19 Oct →
inferno13–90.0030%19 Oct →
dust213–60.0513%19 Oct →
cache6–13-0.1113%17 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0020%17 Oct →
dust213–110.0315%17 Oct →
ancient16–14-0.0130%17 Oct →
cache4–13-0.0022%16 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0614%16 Oct →
mirage11–130.0216%14 Oct →
inferno9–130.0824%14 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0020%13 Oct →
nuke13–30.0127%13 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0411%11 Oct →
anubis13–3-0.0032%11 Oct →
cache15–190.0530%9 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0242%8 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0123%7 Oct →
dust214–16-0.0135%7 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0529%5 Oct →
ancient13–50.0012%5 Oct →
inferno13–60.0618%5 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.1211%1 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0218%1 Oct →
ancient13–100.0313%30 Sept →
dust27–130.0321%30 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0115%24 Sept →
nuke20–22-0.019%22 Sept →
cache11–130.1038%18 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.0224%10 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0423%6 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0130%6 Sept →
cache5–13-0.0820%1 Sept →
mirage19–16-0.0123%31 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0427%31 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0535%30 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0628%30 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0425%30 Aug →
nuke9–130.0124%26 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0534%25 Aug →
nuke11–130.0530%21 Aug →
vertigo13–100.0929%18 Aug →
nuke13–50.0735%18 Aug →
mirage16–190.0328%17 Aug →
inferno19–170.0228%16 Aug →
nuke13–30.0919%10 Aug →
inferno13–6-0.0131%8 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0616%7 Aug →
ancient14–16-0.0029%7 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0717%4 Aug →
nuke13–100.0621%28 Jul →
cache13–70.0234%27 Jul →
dust213–11-0.0129%24 Jul →
nuke13–7-0.0438%24 Jul →
inferno22–19-0.0443%23 Jul →
nuke13–80.0322%19 Jul →
mirage13–80.0524%19 Jul →
dust213–90.0119%14 Jul →
dust213–100.0228%12 Jul →
cache13–9-0.0614%11 Jul →
dust29–13-0.0218%10 Jul →
nuke16–140.0253%9 Jul →
ancient5–13-0.0528%7 Jul →
cache13–80.0028%7 Jul →
inferno7–13-0.0423%6 Jul →
dust23–13-0.0224%6 Jul →
cache16–14-0.0228%5 Jul →
inferno13–110.0314%5 Jul →
inferno5–13-0.0319%25 Jun →
mirage13–40.0437%24 Jun →
dust213–90.0425%24 Jun →
nuke13–8-0.0218%22 Jun →
inferno6–130.0320%19 Jun →
nuke13–60.1931%19 Jun →
mirage22–200.0125%18 Jun →
ancient11–13-0.0421%17 Jun →
overpass4–130.0417%15 Jun →
nuke5–13-0.0228%14 Jun →
nuke5–13-0.0762%10 Jun →
nuke9–130.0136%2 Jun →
nuke13–110.0923%24 May →
inferno13–50.0212%24 May →
nuke2–13-0.110%22 May →
dust216–19-0.0520%19 May →
cache5–13-0.0921%19 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches10-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.