c0xy

c0xy — CS2 Stats

IE76561198135465748[U:1:175200020]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,442Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating25,375Top 10% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#16285 of 220330 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,015 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 25,375 → 25,375
0Faceit ELO · 2,015 → 2,015
+1Tracked matches · now 3,442
0.0ppWin rate · 43.3% → 43.3%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 65 days played since 27 Mar 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,375 -294 26 Mar15 Sept · 14 days played
25,00025,669peak 25,66926 Mar15 Sept
Faceit ELO: 2,015 +0 27 Aug15 Sept · 6 observations
2,0152,015peak 2,01527 Aug15 Sept
25,669Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,015Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
65Days played since 2025-03-27

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,015
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 485 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 294 below peak (25,669)
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 4,625 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGc0xyFACEITLevel 10 · 2,015 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER25,375 · Red bandPEAK ELO2,015csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning39
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD53461Last 10053%Win rateLWLLLLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −2.2pp headshot accuracy · −56ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 38%
  • Avg reaction 627ms

Last 10

  • 28 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 32%
  • Avg reaction 627ms

Last 20

  • 614 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 33%
  • Avg reaction 655ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim7.6
Utility4.9
Positioning3.9
Opening Duels0.5
Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 37 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 40% on CT to 20% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 655ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning3.9
Utility4.9
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels1.2
Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time660ms−2ms
first ⅓ avg 662ms → last ⅓ avg 660ms
Headshot accuracy30.4%+2.1%
first ⅓ avg 28.4% → last ⅓ avg 30.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 10–13 · anubis, 13 Mar
75%Best headshot accuracy · 0–13 · nuke, 1 Apr
375msFastest reaction time · 11–12 · ancient, 28 Mar
13–1Biggest win · overpass, 13 Mar

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
66In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 59% over 22infernoWeakest map · 44% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2213959%0.00
ancientA1911858%-0.01
infernoC167944%-0.03
anubisB137654%0.00
nukeB126650%0.00
overpassA74357%-0.01
vertigoB63350%0.05
cache21150%0.02
dust221150%-0.02
office1010%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,441Matches
50%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
72.4ADR
60%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
16Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage30846%1.0015.4
Ancient27446%0.9815.3
Anubis23651%0.9914.9
Inferno12455%1.0115.2
Vertigo11055%1.0915.3
Nuke9951%0.9615.3
Overpass4146%1.1115.9
Dust21457%1.0415.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

30.2%Headshot accuracy
32.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.2%Spray accuracy
83.2%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
655msReaction time
20.3%T opening success
40.0%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
4.9%Flash assists
9.17HE damage / grenade
7.39Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4514 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 20.2975% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis8–13-0.0533%9 Sept
inferno13–5-0.0341%9 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0336%8 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0237%8 Sept
office9–130.0743%4 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0221%2 Sept
mirage13–5-0.0324%2 Sept
anubis9–130.0020%25 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0329%24 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0237%24 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0736%10 Aug
nuke5–130.0637%7 Aug
mirage11–130.0636%7 Aug
ancient13–90.0736%3 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0337%29 Jul
mirage13–60.0419%29 Jul
cache8–130.0142%29 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0635%20 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0425%20 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0440%20 Jul
inferno16–12-0.0320%14 Jul
nuke9–130.0230%14 Jul
ancient13–80.0428%13 Jul
inferno16–14-0.0428%13 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0221%3 Jul
nuke13–90.0222%2 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0121%30 Jun
anubis5–13-0.0627%30 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0119%30 Jun
mirage13–30.0131%30 Jun
inferno19–150.0028%29 Jun
anubis13–10-0.0039%18 Jun
nuke14–16-0.0927%15 Jun
mirage13–6-0.0231%15 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0322%11 Jun
nuke16–14-0.0438%2 Jun
inferno13–2-0.0218%2 Jun
cache13–110.0334%1 Jun
ancient6–130.0119%21 Apr
vertigo3–9-0.1255%21 Apr
anubis13–4-0.0131%17 Apr
ancient0–3-0.080%15 Apr
ancient10–130.0537%14 Apr
overpass8–130.0126%14 Apr
anubis12–16-0.0233%8 Apr
ancient8–130.0329%8 Apr
mirage13–50.0525%7 Apr
anubis13–8-0.0331%1 Apr
nuke0–13-0.0575%1 Apr
dust26–13-0.0520%31 Mar
ancient13–20.0539%26 Mar
overpass2–130.0331%24 Mar
mirage2–130.0331%24 Mar
overpass13–110.0133%24 Mar
anubis10–130.1530%13 Mar
overpass13–8-0.1017%13 Mar
overpass13–1-0.0020%13 Mar
vertigo13–40.0432%12 Mar
ancient13–90.0540%20 Feb
inferno13–4-0.0143%18 Feb
inferno16–13-0.0142%18 Feb
overpass10–13-0.0428%16 Feb
vertigo7–130.1224%16 Feb
vertigo12–120.0731%5 Feb
mirage2–130.0725%5 Feb
anubis13–4-0.0127%5 Feb
vertigo13–20.0773%3 Feb
vertigo13–100.1429%30 Jan
mirage13–90.0627%29 Jan
mirage13–100.0322%27 Jan
inferno12–160.0239%26 Jan
ancient13–10-0.0329%3 Dec
ancient4–13-0.0827%2 Dec
dust213–110.0139%25 Nov
ancient13–5-0.0238%17 Nov
inferno9–13-0.0836%3 Oct
overpass13–10-0.0222%29 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0326%29 Sept
ancient13–90.0429%23 Sept
mirage13–40.0532%19 Sept
nuke13–90.0136%19 Sept
nuke13–5-0.0135%12 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0439%12 Sept
ancient13–9-0.0624%12 Aug
mirage22–19-0.0126%10 Aug
mirage16–13-0.0126%10 Aug
ancient13–3-0.0130%27 Jul
nuke9–130.0424%21 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0126%9 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0825%12 Jun
mirage13–2-0.0243%12 Jun
nuke13–40.0119%11 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0321%10 Jun
ancient13–9-0.0233%10 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0316%1 Apr
nuke13–40.0827%1 Apr
anubis13–50.1133%1 Apr
inferno8–13-0.0628%31 Mar
ancient11–12-0.0316%28 Mar
anubis13–11-0.0215%27 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →