nomis

nomis — CS2 Stats

76561198135383824[U:1:175118096]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,131Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidPositional Player
CSDB Leaderboard#8450 of 258569 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,898 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,646 +5,032 18 Mar – 28 May · 14 days played
21,61426,877peak 26,87718 Mar28 May
27,025Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,898Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
63Days played since 2026-02-05

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,898
  • Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 — 102 to go
  • Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGnomisFACEITLevel 10 · 2,898 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,898csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90
Positioning63
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT58–42Last 10058%Win rateWLWLWWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +50pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · −2.7pp headshot accuracy · −116ms reaction

Win rate up 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 439ms

Last 10

  • 8–2 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 445ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 502ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim9.0
Utility5.6
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels5.7
Clutch3.4

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 35% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0
Positioning6.3
Utility5.6
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact3.9

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time527ms−49ms
first ⅓ avg 576ms → last ⅓ avg 527ms
Headshot accuracy26.5%+4.1%
first ⅓ avg 22.5% → last ⅓ avg 26.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating · 2–3 · mirage, 27 May →
69%Best headshot accuracy · 7–3 · nuke, 13 Jul →
375msFastest reaction time · 13–7 · ancient, 17 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 16 May →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

11Longest win streak
7–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 72% over 25anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS2518–772%0.05
dust2A1911–858%0.03
ancientB168–850%0.02
nukeA138–562%0.04
infernoB137–654%0.03
cacheA74–357%0.09
anubisD51–420%0.03
usp_containment—11–0100%0.18
vertigo—10–10%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,651Matches
53%Win rate
1.16Avg K/D
85.3ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
16Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage41250%1.1116.5
Dust228054%1.1517.0
Ancient20148%1.0916.4
Nuke17054%1.2417.0
Inferno10854%1.1817.0
Vertigo6368%1.4418.1
Cache4360%1.5419.6
Anubis2861%1.2520.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.2%Headshot accuracy
39.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.9%Spray accuracy
81.3%Counter-strafing
8.0°Preaim
508msReaction time
34.9%T opening success
54.3%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
10.8%Flash assists
8.89HE damage / grenade
6.09Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.8511% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–50.1036%14 Oct →
dust211–130.0025%9 Sept →
cache13–90.0924%8 Sept →
nuke9–130.0223%30 Aug →
ancient13–7-0.0121%17 Aug →
dust213–50.1129%15 Aug →
nuke13–110.0524%15 Aug →
dust216–120.0722%9 Aug →
dust213–50.0738%29 Jul →
dust213–10-0.0318%29 Jul →
nuke6–13-0.0421%28 Jul →
dust213–100.0521%27 Jul →
mirage10–130.1048%13 Jul →
nuke7–30.0669%13 Jul →
cache8–130.1131%12 Jul →
mirage6–130.0321%28 Jun →
dust213–110.0224%27 Jun →
inferno5–13-0.0225%27 Jun →
ancient2–13-0.056%27 Jun →
dust213–16-0.0819%24 Jun →
dust213–10-0.0213%22 Jun →
anubis8–13-0.0125%21 Jun →
dust27–13-0.0235%14 Jun →
dust210–13-0.0325%10 Jun →
nuke7–13-0.0413%10 Jun →
ancient13–6-0.0529%10 Jun →
cache11–130.0117%8 Jun →
usp_containment13–70.1824%31 May →
ancient5–13-0.0237%28 May →
inferno13–7-0.0623%27 May →
mirage2–130.0118%27 May →
inferno13–20.1433%27 May →
mirage2–30.2237%27 May →
inferno11–130.0238%27 May →
nuke13–40.1127%27 May →
cache13–20.2124%26 May →
nuke13–10-0.0314%26 May →
mirage13–90.0527%26 May →
anubis7–13-0.0316%26 May →
inferno13–60.1642%26 May →
ancient14–16-0.0322%24 May →
ancient10–130.1028%23 May →
nuke11–130.0930%23 May →
mirage13–90.1036%23 May →
mirage13–50.037%20 May →
mirage13–11-0.0510%19 May →
mirage8–130.0527%18 May →
dust213–50.1520%18 May →
inferno13–80.0624%18 May →
mirage13–20.1227%18 May →
nuke9–130.0538%17 May →
ancient13–100.0219%17 May →
cache10–130.0118%16 May →
dust213–10.1931%16 May →
ancient13–70.0431%16 May →
mirage13–40.0619%16 May →
mirage13–6-0.0120%14 May →
inferno13–40.0126%10 May →
nuke13–80.1339%6 May →
anubis6–00.1422%6 May →
cache13–70.0833%6 May →
mirage13–110.0919%5 May →
inferno13–50.0544%5 May →
dust213–7-0.0128%5 May →
dust24–120.0232%28 Apr →
ancient13–90.0619%27 Apr →
dust211–130.0028%27 Apr →
dust210–13-0.0417%27 Apr →
ancient5–13-0.0127%26 Apr →
mirage13–9-0.0630%23 Apr →
vertigo5–130.0426%2 Apr →
mirage13–30.1126%30 Mar →
ancient13–60.1122%26 Mar →
inferno11–130.0143%26 Mar →
mirage13–90.0221%25 Mar →
mirage10–13-0.0413%24 Mar →
mirage13–20.0423%24 Mar →
mirage13–40.0113%23 Mar →
inferno13–8-0.0216%19 Mar →
ancient10–130.0125%19 Mar →
ancient13–60.1117%18 Mar →
inferno11–13-0.0315%17 Mar →
mirage13–60.1023%15 Mar →
inferno11–130.0415%6 Mar →
mirage16–130.0819%6 Mar →
ancient12–16-0.0217%2 Mar →
anubis11–130.0023%26 Feb →
dust211–130.0310%25 Feb →
anubis6–130.0321%24 Feb →
mirage13–60.0516%23 Feb →
inferno6–13-0.0524%21 Feb →
ancient3–13-0.0620%20 Feb →
ancient13–110.0939%20 Feb →
nuke13–70.0836%17 Feb →
mirage13–90.0218%17 Feb →
dust213–70.0935%16 Feb →
nuke13–6-0.0125%10 Feb →
nuke13–110.0629%9 Feb →
mirage6–130.0714%8 Feb →
mirage16–140.0725%5 Feb →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 Matches11-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.