Xiao Mei (小美)

Xiao Mei (小美) — CS2 Stats

76561198135258857[U:1:174993129]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,005Tracked matches33%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.5 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating15,943Purple band · top ~24.6% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 5 Sep 2026 (13 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 27 days played since 23 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,943 -1,296 23 May5 Sept · 22 days played
15,76919,877peak 19,87723 May5 Sept
19,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
27Days played since 2026-05-23

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,934 below peak (19,877)
  • -2,171 over 30 days · declining
  • -1,327 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 4,057 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGXiao Mei (小美)FACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER15,943 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim59
Positioning40
Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY42553Last 10042%Win rateLWLWLWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +4.4pp headshot accuracy · −41ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 634ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 612ms

Last 20

  • 713 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 633ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.9 against its own average).

Aim5.9
Utility6.5
Positioning4.0
Opening Duels1.9
Clutch2.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 44% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 644ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.9
Positioning4.0
Utility6.5
Mechanics5.4
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time631ms−15ms
first ⅓ avg 646ms → last ⅓ avg 631ms
Headshot accuracy16.7%−0.7%
first ⅓ avg 17.5% → last ⅓ avg 16.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 9–1 · vertigo, 7 Aug
100%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · ancient, 5 Jun
422msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · inferno, 10 Jul
13–2Biggest win · inferno, 5 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
107In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 60% over 5mirageWeakest map · 13% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB25131252%-0.02
ancientC2491538%-0.02
cacheC167944%-0.03
anubisB147750%-0.00
mirageD81713%-0.04
dust2A53260%0.00
overpass41325%-0.02
nuke3030%-0.00
vertigo110100%0.12

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

27Matches
44%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
77.4ADR
35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

30%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust2520%0.8813.4
Anubis540%1.3218.6
Mirage367%1.1012.7
Inferno1100%1.5021.0
Ancient1100%1.6213.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.2%Headshot accuracy
34.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.1%Spray accuracy
74.4%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
644msReaction time
23.8%T opening success
43.6%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
6.6%Flash assists
10.55HE damage / grenade
12.57Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.7618% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–16-0.0410%5 Sept
inferno13–2-0.0327%5 Sept
ancient10–13-0.0623%5 Sept
ancient16–130.0215%4 Sept
anubis8–13-0.0215%4 Sept
inferno13–30.0619%4 Sept
ancient13–9-0.0120%4 Sept
anubis7–130.0217%28 Aug
inferno13–2-0.0233%28 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0410%28 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0413%22 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0220%22 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0319%22 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0519%22 Aug
inferno3–13-0.095%11 Aug
cache4–13-0.0910%11 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0311%9 Aug
dust213–9-0.009%9 Aug
cache13–11-0.0429%9 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0311%8 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0013%8 Aug
anubis13–80.0813%8 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0210%8 Aug
inferno16–14-0.0319%7 Aug
cache11–13-0.0316%7 Aug
anubis13–100.0824%7 Aug
inferno5–13-0.047%7 Aug
vertigo9–10.1224%7 Aug
inferno5–13-0.068%1 Aug
cache9–130.0326%1 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0517%1 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0615%1 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0325%31 Jul
cache2–13-0.0112%25 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0113%25 Jul
ancient4–13-0.039%25 Jul
inferno13–90.0914%25 Jul
anubis16–13-0.0018%25 Jul
dust215–150.0111%22 Jul
cache8–13-0.0622%22 Jul
anubis13–7-0.069%22 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0219%22 Jul
ancient3–13-0.047%22 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0619%18 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0215%18 Jul
anubis15–15-0.0323%18 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0720%18 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0513%18 Jul
inferno13–4-0.0514%18 Jul
nuke5–130.0215%17 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0320%17 Jul
cache13–11-0.0013%17 Jul
ancient13–6-0.0518%17 Jul
inferno16–13-0.0120%11 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0017%11 Jul
inferno13–5-0.0119%11 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0213%10 Jul
cache16–13-0.0311%10 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0513%10 Jul
cache13–90.0230%10 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0513%10 Jul
anubis11–130.0310%2 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0213%2 Jul
dust27–130.0418%2 Jul
overpass15–15-0.0618%2 Jul
dust216–14-0.0115%2 Jul
cache8–13-0.0216%1 Jul
cache4–13-0.076%30 Jun
ancient13–9-0.028%30 Jun
cache8–13-0.0218%29 Jun
inferno13–80.0417%12 Jun
anubis13–11-0.0413%12 Jun
ancient13–11-0.026%12 Jun
overpass13–70.0319%12 Jun
ancient14–16-0.0410%12 Jun
mirage0–13-0.1113%5 Jun
ancient6–130.0113%5 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0714%5 Jun
inferno13–80.0629%5 Jun
ancient1–13-0.03100%5 Jun
inferno8–13-0.009%30 May
ancient13–40.0111%30 May
overpass9–13-0.0318%30 May
dust213–10-0.0319%30 May
anubis13–9-0.028%30 May
cache13–6-0.0425%29 May
ancient11–130.0120%29 May
ancient13–110.019%29 May
mirage10–130.0218%29 May
overpass13–16-0.0227%29 May
mirage9–130.0120%28 May
inferno13–40.0219%28 May
cache13–6-0.1015%24 May
cache13–10-0.0114%24 May
cache6–130.0313%24 May
anubis13–16-0.0119%23 May
mirage3–13-0.0523%23 May
inferno13–11-0.043%23 May
nuke6–13-0.019%23 May
ancient8–13-0.0314%23 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →