Vladimirovits Daitsev

Vladimirovits Daitsev — CS2 Stats

RU76561198133818646[U:1:173552918]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,638Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating28,118Top 5% of 204,219 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#2298 of 251285 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,533 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 6 Oct 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 28,118 +3,390 10 Aug – 6 Oct · 34 days played
24,72828,777peak 28,77710 Aug6 Oct
28,906Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,533Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
35Days played since 2026-08-07

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,533
  • Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 — 467 to go
  • Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-09-13
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-13

Premier CS Rating

  • 659 below peak (28,777)
  • +2,443 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 1,882 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-13
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-13

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGVladimirovits DaitsevFACEITLevel 10 · 2,533 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER28,118 · Red bandPEAK ELO2,533csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning66
Utility69

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD45–53–2Last 10045%Win rateWLLLLLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −0.2pp headshot accuracy · +25ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 606ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 586ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 573ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility6.9
Positioning6.6
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch4.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 554ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning6.6
Utility6.9
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact3.3

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time555ms−24ms
first ⅓ avg 579ms → last ⅓ avg 555ms
Headshot accuracy23.0%−1.8%
first ⅓ avg 24.8% → last ⅓ avg 23.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 13–2 · inferno, 19 Sept →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · inferno, 19 Sept →
375msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · inferno, 18 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 15 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
7–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 58% over 19nukeWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC208–1240%0.04
cacheA1911–858%0.06
infernoB178–947%0.04
dust2C156–940%0.03
ancientA127–558%0.06
anubisD103–730%0.06
nukeD72–529%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

4,197Matches
54%Win rate
1.23Avg K/D
84.1ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage23650%1.1717.2
Ancient15948%1.2116.9
Anubis14552%1.2417.8
Dust210153%1.1917.1
Inferno9857%1.2217.6
Nuke8746%1.1817.7
Vertigo4755%1.1817.6
Overpass3057%1.3018.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.8%Headshot accuracy
35.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.6%Spray accuracy
83.0%Counter-strafing
8.1°Preaim
554msReaction time
36.4%T opening success
49.9%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
7.9%Flash assists
9.94HE damage / grenade
13.91Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.4407% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–110.0518%11 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0222%6 Oct →
anubis9–130.1120%6 Oct →
cache2–130.0633%6 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0218%6 Oct →
cache7–130.0112%5 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0230%5 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0217%5 Oct →
mirage13–40.1027%4 Oct →
ancient6–130.0622%4 Oct →
mirage16–130.0316%4 Oct →
mirage11–130.0513%4 Oct →
dust23–130.0121%4 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0519%1 Oct →
inferno13–90.0618%1 Oct →
dust216–140.0430%1 Oct →
ancient13–70.0524%1 Oct →
ancient3–130.0126%1 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0314%29 Sept →
cache13–100.0739%29 Sept →
ancient13–90.0123%28 Sept →
mirage15–150.1218%28 Sept →
mirage1–13-0.0519%28 Sept →
cache11–130.0914%28 Sept →
nuke13–80.1730%27 Sept →
mirage16–14-0.0015%24 Sept →
cache16–140.0424%23 Sept →
anubis13–110.1126%23 Sept →
ancient5–130.0137%22 Sept →
inferno5–130.0624%22 Sept →
cache3–130.0324%21 Sept →
inferno13–100.0932%21 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0441%21 Sept →
ancient13–70.0128%21 Sept →
cache13–80.0731%21 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0146%20 Sept →
cache2–130.0318%20 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0333%19 Sept →
inferno13–20.2150%19 Sept →
dust213–70.1017%19 Sept →
ancient13–100.1027%19 Sept →
inferno4–130.0016%19 Sept →
mirage7–130.0727%19 Sept →
nuke6–130.1136%19 Sept →
dust216–12-0.0123%18 Sept →
anubis7–130.0222%18 Sept →
mirage0–13-0.0521%18 Sept →
cache13–50.1723%17 Sept →
ancient9–130.1218%17 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0310%17 Sept →
anubis13–80.1318%17 Sept →
ancient16–120.1020%16 Sept →
dust212–160.0026%16 Sept →
mirage10–130.0221%16 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0223%15 Sept →
mirage13–10.0538%15 Sept →
ancient13–80.1224%15 Sept →
anubis13–110.0217%15 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0324%15 Sept →
mirage13–60.0837%14 Sept →
inferno13–60.0723%14 Sept →
mirage13–50.1130%14 Sept →
ancient16–120.1031%11 Sept →
cache4–130.0733%10 Sept →
dust29–130.0221%8 Sept →
cache13–70.1334%8 Sept →
nuke15–150.1730%8 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0318%7 Sept →
inferno2–13-0.0324%7 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0240%7 Sept →
mirage5–130.0010%7 Sept →
cache13–100.1222%7 Sept →
mirage9–130.0920%6 Sept →
dust25–130.0021%6 Sept →
anubis10–130.0733%6 Sept →
dust213–70.1525%3 Sept →
inferno13–90.0725%3 Sept →
nuke13–80.0516%2 Sept →
mirage13–100.1124%2 Sept →
dust213–160.0924%2 Sept →
inferno4–130.0223%2 Sept →
cache2–13-0.0418%30 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.0413%26 Aug →
cache13–70.0419%26 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0222%19 Aug →
mirage11–130.0640%19 Aug →
dust28–130.0536%19 Aug →
inferno13–110.1020%18 Aug →
anubis6–130.1026%18 Aug →
mirage7–130.0521%17 Aug →
inferno9–130.0446%17 Aug →
cache13–30.1229%17 Aug →
dust216–130.1425%12 Aug →
cache13–60.1021%12 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.0021%11 Aug →
cache13–50.1229%11 Aug →
inferno13–7-0.0118%10 Aug →
anubis8–130.1429%10 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0428%10 Aug →
inferno13–50.0232%7 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.