Carsten

Carsten — CS2 Stats

NL76561198132691629[U:1:172425901]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,256Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingSupport
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 4,256 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 34 days played since 2 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,905 +163 2 Jun6 Jul · 15 days played
21,19123,792peak 23,7922 Jun6 Jul
Faceit ELO: 2,319 +0 5 Sept18 Sept · 3 observations
2,3192,319peak 2,3195 Sept18 Sept
23,792Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,319Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
34Days played since 2026-06-02

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,319
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 181 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-05
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-05

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCarstenPEAK ELO2,319csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim65
Positioning44
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT47521Last 10047%Win rateWWWLLWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +60pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating · −4.3pp headshot accuracy · −6ms reaction

Win rate up 60pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 549ms

Last 10

  • 82 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 584ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.7 against its own average).

Aim6.5
Utility6.3
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 39% on CT to 15% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 574ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5
Positioning4.4
Utility6.3
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels1.1
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time576ms−20ms
first ⅓ avg 597ms → last ⅓ avg 576ms
Headshot accuracy18.2%+0.7%
first ⅓ avg 17.5% → last ⅓ avg 18.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–2 · dust2, 6 Aug
48%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · anubis, 22 Jul
352msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · dust2, 7 Jun
13–2Biggest win · dust2, 6 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W3Current streak
68In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 68% over 19anubisWeakest map · 36% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoS1913668%0.01
mirageB189950%0.00
dust2C156940%0.01
anubisC145936%-0.01
ancientC135838%0.00
nukeC114736%-0.02
cacheA74357%-0.01
overpass31233%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,572Matches
51%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
66.8ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient24444%0.9512.8
Inferno20355%1.0412.9
Dust29755%1.1913.4
Nuke9649%0.9212.5
Mirage8752%0.9612.6
Anubis7858%1.0113.0
Overpass3339%0.8712.2
Vertigo2020%0.8112.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.8%Headshot accuracy
30.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.8%Spray accuracy
78.6%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
574msReaction time
14.8%T opening success
38.9%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
10.0%Flash assists
9.18HE damage / grenade
9.93Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 14.804% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–30.0011%25 Aug
cache13–11-0.0210%25 Aug
anubis13–30.0218%8 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0417%8 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0220%7 Aug
dust213–60.0119%7 Aug
ancient13–80.1426%7 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0514%7 Aug
inferno13–100.0217%6 Aug
dust213–20.1823%6 Aug
cache13–20.0224%4 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0028%4 Aug
cache11–13-0.019%3 Aug
ancient20–22-0.0523%31 Jul
ancient13–8-0.049%25 Jul
dust26–13-0.0318%25 Jul
anubis7–130.0248%22 Jul
dust27–13-0.0423%22 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0311%22 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0626%21 Jul
nuke13–7-0.0112%21 Jul
mirage13–70.047%21 Jul
inferno13–50.0212%21 Jul
dust27–130.0529%21 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0325%21 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0519%20 Jul
anubis16–140.027%18 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0232%18 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0818%15 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0115%15 Jul
cache16–14-0.0313%15 Jul
anubis16–130.0112%13 Jul
anubis13–16-0.049%12 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0227%12 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0317%12 Jul
mirage7–130.0220%12 Jul
cache2–13-0.0517%11 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0214%11 Jul
ancient13–8-0.008%9 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0815%9 Jul
overpass3–13-0.0827%8 Jul
cache7–13-0.0225%8 Jul
mirage13–80.0514%8 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0711%7 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0520%6 Jul
inferno13–60.0537%6 Jul
nuke11–130.0327%6 Jul
mirage13–70.0727%4 Jul
nuke14–16-0.0320%4 Jul
mirage13–80.0221%4 Jul
nuke9–130.0319%4 Jul
dust25–13-0.0120%4 Jul
inferno13–50.1214%4 Jul
mirage13–80.0217%2 Jul
inferno13–40.0322%2 Jul
ancient13–70.0416%2 Jul
mirage13–100.0720%2 Jul
inferno15–15-0.0311%2 Jul
mirage5–13-0.068%15 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0515%15 Jun
dust213–30.0913%15 Jun
ancient8–130.1123%15 Jun
dust27–13-0.0322%14 Jun
anubis6–13-0.0413%14 Jun
inferno8–130.0419%12 Jun
overpass13–100.0214%12 Jun
ancient13–70.009%12 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0016%12 Jun
anubis10–13-0.0230%11 Jun
mirage8–130.0111%11 Jun
dust211–13-0.0331%11 Jun
inferno16–13-0.0311%11 Jun
dust29–13-0.0720%11 Jun
inferno13–50.0513%11 Jun
inferno13–3-0.0533%9 Jun
mirage13–60.0014%9 Jun
nuke7–130.0213%8 Jun
inferno12–16-0.0020%8 Jun
nuke13–5-0.0419%8 Jun
dust28–13-0.1126%7 Jun
nuke1–13-0.115%7 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0113%7 Jun
dust213–60.1020%6 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0121%5 Jun
anubis13–60.0619%5 Jun
dust213–80.0324%4 Jun
mirage6–130.0317%4 Jun
inferno6–30.0127%4 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0314%4 Jun
dust213–6-0.0216%4 Jun
cache13–70.0414%4 Jun
inferno13–110.0616%4 Jun
dust29–13-0.0211%4 Jun
nuke13–110.0232%3 Jun
nuke13–11-0.047%3 Jun
anubis6–13-0.096%3 Jun
overpass3–13-0.048%3 Jun
mirage13–50.024%2 Jun
inferno13–70.0814%2 Jun
anubis11–130.0431%2 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →