✪ ttuhs

✪ ttuhs — CS2 Stats

VI76561198130282174[U:1:170016446]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,957Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating20,893Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#10021 of 27534 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,317 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GG✪ ttuhsFACEITLevel 6 · 1,317 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER20,893 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning52
Utility40

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50446Last 10050%Win rateWWWLWLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.8
Aggression5.2
Utility4.0
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels1.0
Clutch2.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 37 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 44% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 573ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning5.2
Utility4.0
Mechanics8.2
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time581ms−81ms
first ⅓ avg 662ms → last ⅓ avg 581ms
Headshot accuracy18.6%+5.0%
first ⅓ avg 13.6% → last ⅓ avg 18.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — nuke 9–1
130Biggest win — mirage
4Longest win streak
W3Current streak
711In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 58% over 12mirageWeakest map · 40% over 30
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC30121840%-0.01
infernoA2112957%0.01
dust2A127558%-0.01
nukeC94544%0.03
cacheA74357%-0.01
poseidon42250%0.01
eldorado42250%-0.07
anubis330100%0.02
vertigo32167%-0.02
debris32167%0.04
ancient2020%-0.03
office1010%0.01
overpass1010%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 30). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

430Matches
48%Win rate
1.29Avg K/D
85.2ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3339%1.1616.1
Inferno1267%1.2617.4
Dust2967%1.3820.9
Ancient922%1.0215.1
Nuke838%1.4117.1
Vertigo560%0.8914.4
Anubis450%1.0118.5
Train333%1.3916.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.7%Headshot accuracy
41.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
47.4%Spray accuracy
86.8%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
573msReaction time
23.9%T opening success
43.9%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
4.3%Flash assists
9.14HE damage / grenade
4.85Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4581 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.8555% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 30 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–60.027%28 Aug
inferno13–100.049%28 Aug
dust213–110.0226%28 Aug
inferno10–130.0215%27 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0222%27 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0820%26 Aug
nuke11–13-0.036%26 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0410%26 Aug
mirage11–130.029%25 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0420%24 Aug
poseidon9–40.0623%24 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0618%24 Aug
mirage13–70.0523%24 Aug
dust213–110.0328%24 Aug
inferno13–20.0340%24 Aug
mirage0–5-0.0343%24 Aug
cache10–130.016%20 Aug
inferno13–60.0416%20 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0118%16 Aug
dust213–6-0.0129%16 Aug
dust210–13-0.0518%15 Aug
cache13–100.0126%15 Aug
anubis13–100.0515%14 Aug
dust214–16-0.0512%14 Aug
mirage13–100.0017%13 Aug
mirage16–13-0.0023%13 Aug
mirage13–70.0212%13 Aug
mirage15–150.1018%12 Aug
inferno13–70.0514%12 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0322%11 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0117%7 Aug
cache5–13-0.0311%7 Aug
mirage15–150.0421%7 Aug
mirage2–130.0310%7 Aug
mirage7–130.0217%7 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0215%6 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0713%6 Aug
inferno5–130.0116%6 Aug
dust216–130.0123%6 Aug
mirage10–130.0219%5 Aug
inferno8–80.0415%5 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0810%3 Aug
office7–70.0143%2 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0610%2 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0628%31 Jul
inferno13–60.0123%31 Jul
inferno16–140.0421%31 Jul
dust28–13-0.0824%30 Jul
mirage13–80.0115%30 Jul
inferno3–9-0.0460%30 Jul
eldorado4–9-0.1130%30 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0021%28 Jul
inferno9–10.0527%23 Jul
eldorado9–60.0127%23 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0116%22 Jul
poseidon9–70.069%21 Jul
vertigo9–70.0229%21 Jul
eldorado9–6-0.0912%21 Jul
debris9–20.0140%21 Jul
poseidon7–9-0.0124%21 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0915%20 Jul
cache12–30.0416%20 Jul
anubis13–70.019%20 Jul
dust211–130.0418%20 Jul
nuke9–10.147%20 Jul
mirage5–13-0.106%18 Jul
dust213–80.0218%18 Jul
mirage13–70.0321%18 Jul
mirage13–110.0113%18 Jul
anubis16–13-0.0115%18 Jul
inferno7–13-0.025%18 Jul
dust24–1-0.060%18 Jul
nuke11–130.0624%18 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0318%18 Jul
vertigo9–50.0419%18 Jul
eldorado5–9-0.106%18 Jul
poseidon4–9-0.0823%18 Jul
overpass7–9-0.0417%18 Jul
nuke7–9-0.1223%18 Jul
debris9–40.1310%18 Jul
inferno13–70.0420%17 Jul
mirage13–0-0.020%17 Jul
cache13–10-0.0713%17 Jul
vertigo8–8-0.1114%16 Jul
nuke9–60.1417%16 Jul
inferno4–13-0.067%16 Jul
mirage13–8-0.015%16 Jul
cache15–150.0224%16 Jul
dust215–15-0.0421%16 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0119%16 Jul
cache13–8-0.016%16 Jul
mirage13–70.0218%15 Jul
inferno13–90.048%15 Jul
nuke13–40.129%15 Jul
inferno14–160.0613%14 Jul
debris4–9-0.0223%14 Jul
mirage13–70.0411%13 Jul
inferno13–50.009%13 Jul
dust216–14-0.018%13 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0310%12 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →