snag

snag — CS2 Stats

BR76561198129727993[U:1:169462265]Steam profile ↗

484Tracked matches53%Win rate2022Tracked since
3,609Hours in CS67Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating27,354Top 10% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#316 of 6612 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,068 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGsnagFACEITLevel 8 · 1,068 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER27,354 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning37
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53461Last 10053%Win rateLLLWLLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.1
Aggression1.6
Utility5.6
Positioning3.7
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch2.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 35% on CT to 13% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 577ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning3.7
Utility5.6
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels0.6
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time592ms−42ms
first ⅓ avg 634ms → last ⅓ avg 592ms
Headshot accuracy17.5%+1.2%
first ⅓ avg 16.3% → last ⅓ avg 17.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.07Best rating — ancient 13–6
132Biggest win — dust2
4Longest win streak
L3Current streak
156In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 65% over 17anubisWeakest map · 0% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A33211264%-0.01
ancientB179853%-0.02
mirageS1711665%-0.02
infernoC94544%-0.03
nukeA95456%-0.02
cacheD62433%-0.01
anubisD6060%-0.06
overpass31233%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

173,808Lifetime kills
1.04K/D
2,312Matches
46.6%Match win rate · Top 50% of tracked players
12.7%Headshot %
10.9%Shot accuracy
4,351MVPs
2,238Hours (in match)
1,762Bombs planted
607Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,521inferno
4,453dust2
1,318nuke
1,168train
364vertigo
279cbble
122italy
100dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

170Matches
59%Win rate
0.95Avg K/D
70.8ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust26862%0.9614.2
Mirage2952%0.8812.9
Ancient2654%0.9914.8
Nuke1540%0.7711.7
Inferno1275%1.1316.2
Anubis978%1.0216.7
Cache540%0.9616.2
Train475%1.0418.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.3%Headshot accuracy
35.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.7%Spray accuracy
77.5%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
577msReaction time
13.3%T opening success
35.0%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
8.9%Flash assists
6.93HE damage / grenade
11.73Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 13.343% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust29–13-0.0327%26 Aug
cache12–160.0224%26 Aug
anubis17–190.0216%25 Aug
dust213–8-0.0215%25 Aug
dust25–13-0.0721%22 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0319%22 Aug
inferno13–30.0216%22 Aug
dust213–20.0128%22 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0318%22 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0510%20 Aug
dust23–13-0.0220%16 Aug
inferno25–23-0.0511%16 Aug
dust213–10-0.0213%16 Aug
ancient13–50.0519%12 Aug
dust213–11-0.0321%12 Aug
dust27–130.0213%12 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0617%9 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0318%8 Aug
dust213–20.0525%8 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0518%8 Aug
cache13–8-0.0321%8 Aug
nuke13–110.0119%8 Aug
ancient13–80.0011%8 Aug
dust24–13-0.0413%6 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0215%6 Aug
inferno5–13-0.1012%5 Aug
dust26–13-0.0519%5 Aug
mirage13–50.0719%5 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0014%4 Aug
dust213–3-0.0517%4 Aug
dust219–16-0.0716%2 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0015%1 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0217%30 Jul
dust213–110.0114%30 Jul
cache13–8-0.0417%29 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0214%29 Jul
nuke3–13-0.0727%28 Jul
dust27–13-0.0421%28 Jul
nuke13–7-0.0130%28 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0125%28 Jul
cache11–13-0.046%27 Jul
dust213–110.0211%25 Jul
cache1–8-0.0022%16 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0630%15 Jul
dust213–50.0128%9 Jul
mirage13–30.017%9 Jul
cache11–13-0.0012%8 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0210%8 Jul
dust217–19-0.0512%8 Jul
mirage13–20.0616%5 Jul
dust213–70.0234%5 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0222%5 Jul
ancient16–130.0427%5 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0822%27 Jun
nuke13–7-0.049%24 Jun
dust213–160.0120%24 Jun
dust213–11-0.0425%24 Jun
inferno13–11-0.0231%23 Jun
nuke0–13-0.0522%20 Jun
dust213–110.0732%20 Jun
ancient13–60.0716%18 Jun
ancient14–16-0.0419%17 Jun
dust213–100.0522%17 Jun
mirage1–13-0.039%16 Jun
ancient15–150.0720%15 Jun
ancient7–13-0.0423%15 Jun
inferno9–13-0.053%12 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0813%12 Jun
dust213–20.0417%11 Jun
ancient2–13-0.0118%11 Jun
dust216–14-0.0015%11 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0326%10 Jun
dust219–170.0220%7 Jun
overpass0–9-0.070%6 Jun
ancient16–14-0.0815%5 Jun
dust210–13-0.0112%4 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0617%3 Jun
anubis10–13-0.0910%30 May
mirage13–8-0.008%27 May
mirage13–6-0.0231%27 May
dust213–11-0.0313%26 May
mirage13–10-0.0324%26 May
dust210–13-0.0119%26 May
overpass5–130.0331%18 May
anubis3–13-0.0620%18 May
ancient13–9-0.0714%11 May
inferno13–9-0.0217%11 May
mirage13–8-0.0319%9 May
inferno11–13-0.0115%8 May
dust216–19-0.0817%8 May
dust213–3-0.0511%5 May
dust216–13-0.0219%5 May
dust213–8-0.0120%4 May
mirage7–10.007%4 May
inferno10–13-0.0311%3 May
nuke6–130.0122%3 May
mirage0–13-0.0422%3 May
overpass13–3-0.090%3 May
nuke13–80.0210%3 May
anubis4–13-0.0825%3 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →