snag

snag — CS2 Stats

BR76561198129727993[U:1:169462265]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

567Tracked matches47%Win rate2022Tracked since
3,719Hours in CS9Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating28,409Top 5% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#2404 of 261521 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Oct 2026 (27 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 28,409 +2,349 30 Jul – 18 Oct · 16 days played
26,06028,409peak 28,40930 Jul18 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,068 +0 28 Aug – 18 Sept · 7 observations
1,0681,068peak 1,06828 Aug18 Sept
28,409Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,068Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
41Days played since 2026-07-28

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 28,409
  • +733 over 30 days · improving
  • +2,349 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 1,591 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches1524−9
Win rate60%38%+23pp
K/D0.760.90−0.14
Headshot %60%58%+3pp

Measured 17 Oct 2026 → 14 Nov 2026; previous 18 Sep 2026 → 17 Oct 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,595), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate13.6%45.7%46.8%33.2% short
Shot accuracy10.2%12.7%13.0%2.8% short
Kill/death ratio1.031.051.060.03 short
Match win rate46.2%45.7%46.3%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGsnagFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER28,409 · Red bandPEAK ELO1,068csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning54
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT49–51Last 10049%Win rateWWWWWWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −2.6pp headshot accuracy · +60ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 5–0 · 100% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 637ms

Last 10

  • 8–2 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 591ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 561ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim7.5
Utility4.2
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels0.1
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 49% on T to 29% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning5.4
Utility4.2
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time555ms−55ms
first ⅓ avg 610ms → last ⅓ avg 555ms
Headshot accuracy20.2%+2.4%
first ⅓ avg 17.8% → last ⅓ avg 20.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–3 · mirage, 9 Sept →
38%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · mirage, 18 Oct →
422msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · mirage, 19 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 3 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
W7Current streak
9–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 71% over 7anubisWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C2912–1741%-0.02
mirageC156–940%0.00
cacheA149–564%-0.02
ancientA148–657%-0.00
infernoA116–555%-0.02
nukeS75–271%-0.01
anubisD71–614%-0.01
overpass—21–150%-0.01
vertigo—11–0100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

177,288Lifetime kills
1.03K/D
2,418Matches
46.2%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 7 players
13.6%Headshot %
10.2%Shot accuracy
4,526MVPs
2,353Hours (in match)
1,850Bombs planted
626Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,709dust2
4,702inferno
1,372nuke
1,168train
377vertigo
279cbble
122italy
100dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

212Matches
54%Win rate
0.93Avg K/D
70.5ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust27957%0.9313.9
Mirage3944%0.8913.9
Ancient3256%0.9414.0
Inferno1861%1.0415.7
Nuke1844%0.7711.4
Anubis1267%1.0618.3
Cache838%1.0716.6
Train475%1.0418.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.2%Headshot accuracy
35.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.9%Spray accuracy
78.3%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
548msReaction time
49.2%T opening success
28.8%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
3.7%Flash assists
5.32HE damage / grenade
6.41Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 28.788% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–10-0.0522%5 Nov →
ancient13–20.0326%5 Nov →
cache13–9-0.0217%3 Nov →
cache13–6-0.0115%3 Nov →
vertigo13–2-0.0233%3 Nov →
cache13–8-0.0622%3 Nov →
cache13–110.0611%3 Nov →
dust210–13-0.0326%20 Oct →
overpass8–13-0.0718%20 Oct →
overpass13–110.0415%20 Oct →
cache20–22-0.0216%19 Oct →
mirage2–130.0538%18 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0433%18 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.0115%13 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0421%13 Oct →
cache13–2-0.0232%13 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0515%6 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0420%5 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.0313%5 Oct →
nuke13–20.0228%4 Oct →
ancient13–00.0512%3 Oct →
cache7–130.0124%3 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0717%22 Sept →
mirage14–16-0.0225%19 Sept →
inferno13–100.0516%19 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0227%19 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.0413%19 Sept →
mirage6–130.0316%19 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0011%19 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0225%18 Sept →
ancient13–3-0.007%18 Sept →
mirage6–130.0114%16 Sept →
inferno13–60.1123%15 Sept →
dust210–130.0226%15 Sept →
ancient13–160.0516%13 Sept →
dust213–30.078%12 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0113%12 Sept →
inferno13–40.0312%11 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.059%11 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0123%9 Sept →
mirage13–30.1726%9 Sept →
anubis16–130.0821%7 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.0831%7 Sept →
inferno22–19-0.0217%7 Sept →
dust25–130.0114%7 Sept →
ancient2–80.0317%6 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0612%6 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0419%5 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0512%5 Sept →
inferno21–25-0.0519%5 Sept →
dust217–19-0.0513%5 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0136%5 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0414%1 Sept →
anubis14–16-0.0615%1 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0722%1 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0618%31 Aug →
cache13–8-0.086%29 Aug →
dust218–22-0.0321%29 Aug →
dust213–7-0.0115%29 Aug →
dust213–3-0.0016%29 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0327%26 Aug →
cache12–160.0224%26 Aug →
anubis17–190.0216%25 Aug →
dust213–8-0.0215%25 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0721%22 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0319%22 Aug →
inferno13–30.0216%22 Aug →
dust213–20.0128%22 Aug →
ancient13–6-0.0318%22 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0510%20 Aug →
dust23–13-0.0220%16 Aug →
inferno25–23-0.0511%16 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0213%16 Aug →
ancient13–50.0519%12 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0321%12 Aug →
dust27–130.0213%12 Aug →
anubis3–13-0.0617%9 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0318%8 Aug →
dust213–20.0525%8 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0518%8 Aug →
cache13–8-0.0321%8 Aug →
nuke13–110.0119%8 Aug →
ancient13–80.0011%8 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0413%6 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0215%6 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.1012%5 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0519%5 Aug →
mirage13–50.0719%5 Aug →
nuke13–11-0.0014%4 Aug →
dust213–3-0.0517%4 Aug →
dust219–16-0.0716%2 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.0015%1 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0217%30 Jul →
dust213–110.0114%30 Jul →
cache13–8-0.0417%29 Jul →
mirage13–8-0.0214%29 Jul →
nuke3–13-0.0727%28 Jul →
dust27–13-0.0421%28 Jul →
nuke13–7-0.0130%28 Jul →
mirage13–6-0.0125%28 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.