CeeThree

CeeThree — CS2 Stats

76561198128270915[U:1:168005187]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

910Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating26,746Top 5% of 190,010 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#6997 of 235548 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,003 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 21 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 26,746 → 26,746
0Faceit ELO · 2,003 → 2,003
+3Tracked matches · now 910
0.0ppWin rate · 58.6% → 58.6%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 58 days played since 2 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,746 +1,029 2 Jun21 Sept · 18 days played
25,12027,776peak 27,7762 Jun21 Sept
Faceit ELO: 2,003 +0 30 Aug21 Sept · 4 observations
2,0032,003peak 2,00330 Aug21 Sept
27,776Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,003Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
58Days played since 2026-06-02

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,003
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 497 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,030 below peak (27,776)
  • +1,223 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 3,254 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCeeThreeFACEITLevel 9 · 2,003 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER26,746 · Red bandPEAK ELO2,003csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning62
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY60373Last 10060%Win rateWWWWWLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +0.3pp headshot accuracy · +19ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 50 · 100% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 472ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 503ms

Last 20

  • 1181 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 493ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+0.9 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility6.4
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels4.1
Clutch5.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning6.2
Utility6.4
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact7.9

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time517ms−45ms
first ⅓ avg 562ms → last ⅓ avg 517ms
Headshot accuracy18.5%+0.8%
first ⅓ avg 17.7% → last ⅓ avg 18.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–7 · mirage, 20 Jul
30%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · office, 3 Jul
344msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · office, 19 Aug
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 16 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

12Longest win streak
W5Current streak
85In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 80% over 15anubisWeakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheS1712571%0.04
officeS1510567%0.05
mirageS1512380%0.03
ancientC146843%0.01
dust2A127558%0.01
anubisC114736%0.02
nukeA95456%0.06
inferno31233%0.02
vertigo21150%0.05
boulder110100%0.02
overpass110100%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

403Matches
54%Win rate
1.22Avg K/D
87.4ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

47%1v1 clutch win
13%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4760%1.2518.5
Nuke2759%1.1517.6
Dust22642%1.0215.5
Ancient2556%1.4319.3
Anubis2454%1.2517.4
Inferno1839%1.2718.3
Overpass367%1.6117.0
Vertigo3100%1.4416.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.5%Headshot accuracy
38.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.5%Spray accuracy
78.0%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
510msReaction time
37.6%T opening success
47.0%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
8.7%Flash assists
9.38HE damage / grenade
13.49Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.5505% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
office13–110.0629%21 Sept
office13–100.0425%18 Sept
mirage13–110.0318%4 Sept
ancient13–80.0114%4 Sept
dust213–11-0.0213%3 Sept
ancient5–13-0.0820%1 Sept
office8–13-0.0217%30 Aug
dust25–130.0120%28 Aug
mirage13–100.0218%20 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0220%20 Aug
office9–13-0.0116%19 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0126%18 Aug
cache12–120.0021%17 Aug
ancient10–130.0118%17 Aug
mirage13–10.0412%16 Aug
office13–70.0724%15 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0323%12 Aug
dust25–13-0.0119%12 Aug
anubis13–100.0413%11 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0218%11 Aug
ancient13–20.0824%10 Aug
dust213–50.0419%9 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0223%9 Aug
cache13–110.0216%9 Aug
dust210–13-0.0311%9 Aug
office13–100.0418%7 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0310%5 Aug
anubis13–90.0314%4 Aug
office13–50.1625%2 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0017%30 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0222%29 Jul
dust213–20.0714%28 Jul
cache13–70.0514%24 Jul
anubis12–160.0821%24 Jul
nuke4–130.0225%22 Jul
nuke13–40.1020%22 Jul
nuke13–90.1221%20 Jul
mirage13–70.1720%20 Jul
mirage9–130.0118%20 Jul
anubis10–130.0710%19 Jul
mirage13–50.1123%19 Jul
dust22–13-0.0524%19 Jul
ancient13–90.0310%16 Jul
cache13–110.0117%15 Jul
office13–40.0711%15 Jul
office13–40.0620%14 Jul
mirage13–3-0.0111%14 Jul
mirage13–110.0410%13 Jul
mirage13–60.0222%13 Jul
ancient13–80.0119%12 Jul
anubis16–120.0419%12 Jul
dust213–50.0213%12 Jul
cache13–100.0014%11 Jul
anubis13–50.0115%11 Jul
nuke8–130.0416%11 Jul
boulder13–100.0225%10 Jul
cache5–130.0023%10 Jul
mirage13–100.0223%9 Jul
ancient13–20.0821%9 Jul
cache13–80.0922%7 Jul
dust210–13-0.0218%4 Jul
anubis11–130.0820%4 Jul
office13–60.0730%3 Jul
nuke13–40.0625%3 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0613%1 Jul
office5–130.0315%29 Jun
nuke8–130.1421%29 Jun
cache13–20.1324%27 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0416%27 Jun
office13–100.1214%26 Jun
nuke13–30.1222%26 Jun
inferno13–50.0214%26 Jun
office8–130.0315%26 Jun
cache13–70.1115%26 Jun
ancient14–160.0519%25 Jun
vertigo13–10.0619%25 Jun
inferno12–120.0116%25 Jun
anubis5–130.0110%25 Jun
office13–60.0624%22 Jun
cache12–12-0.0515%22 Jun
office5–130.0120%21 Jun
cache13–110.0720%20 Jun
cache13–90.0919%16 Jun
anubis11–130.0213%15 Jun
cache13–60.0318%14 Jun
cache8–13-0.0710%12 Jun
overpass13–10-0.0317%10 Jun
inferno9–130.0418%8 Jun
dust213–70.0620%8 Jun
cache13–90.0716%8 Jun
dust213–110.0019%8 Jun
mirage13–60.1525%8 Jun
ancient8–130.0524%7 Jun
anubis11–13-0.1012%7 Jun
vertigo10–130.0518%6 Jun
cache1–13-0.0521%6 Jun
mirage1–13-0.0214%5 Jun
dust213–60.0514%5 Jun
cache13–40.1522%4 Jun
mirage0–13-0.0420%2 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO500 Matches12-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →