LackiE

LackiE — CS2 Stats

76561198122914367[U:1:162648639]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

684Tracked matches48%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating19,297Top 50% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~11.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#82992 of 221338 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,552 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 684 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 38 days played since 21 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,297 -703 21 Jun16 Sept · 30 days played
15,98820,367peak 20,36721 Jun16 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,552 +0 27 Aug16 Sept · 3 observations
1,5521,552peak 1,55227 Aug16 Sept
20,367Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,552Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
38Days played since 2026-06-21

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,552
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 199 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,070 below peak (20,367)
  • -891 over 30 days · declining
  • -703 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 703 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLackiEFACEITLevel 8 · 1,552 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER19,297 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,552csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning56
Utility72

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD49483Last 10049%Win rateLLWWLLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +2.2pp headshot accuracy · +35ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 592ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 574ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim7.9
Utility7.2
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch4.0

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 598ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning5.6
Utility7.2
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time605ms−13ms
first ⅓ avg 618ms → last ⅓ avg 605ms
Headshot accuracy21.7%+2.9%
first ⅓ avg 18.7% → last ⅓ avg 21.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 13–2 · cache, 17 Aug
50%Best headshot accuracy · 1–7 · nuke, 28 Jul
461msFastest reaction time · 14–16 · ancient, 17 Aug
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 6 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L2Current streak
410In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 15anubisWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2081240%0.03
cacheS1711665%0.03
nukeC156940%0.01
infernoS1510567%0.02
ancientA117464%0.02
dust2C104640%0.01
anubisD72529%0.02
alpine21150%0.04
overpass2020%0.03
warden1010%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

719Matches
52%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
81.3ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5052%1.0916.5
Dust24850%1.0517.0
Anubis3358%1.1619.5
Inferno3050%1.1419.0
Ancient2733%0.9816.1
Nuke2335%1.0817.6
Cache2045%1.1617.8
Overpass667%1.0517.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.2%Headshot accuracy
36.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.2%Spray accuracy
85.2%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
598msReaction time
41.1%T opening success
39.5%CT opening success
0.75Enemies flashed / flash
9.8%Flash assists
11.51HE damage / grenade
9.89Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 39.4585% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage11–130.0513%30 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0026%30 Aug
cache13–40.0846%30 Aug
nuke13–80.0115%28 Aug
anubis7–130.0514%27 Aug
nuke11–130.0213%26 Aug
dust27–13-0.0819%25 Aug
anubis13–16-0.0017%25 Aug
nuke9–130.0022%25 Aug
dust213–100.0117%19 Aug
ancient13–160.0713%18 Aug
nuke5–130.0421%18 Aug
cache13–40.0222%17 Aug
ancient14–160.0620%17 Aug
cache13–20.2118%17 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0816%16 Aug
dust213–5-0.0014%12 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0418%29 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0413%28 Jul
ancient13–30.0125%28 Jul
cache13–90.0122%28 Jul
cache15–150.0023%28 Jul
nuke1–70.0550%28 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0121%27 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0218%27 Jul
dust26–13-0.0138%27 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0111%26 Jul
cache13–9-0.0024%26 Jul
nuke16–130.0627%24 Jul
cache13–6-0.0418%22 Jul
inferno13–60.0323%22 Jul
mirage13–70.0825%22 Jul
dust213–70.0632%22 Jul
mirage3–130.0037%22 Jul
ancient3–13-0.0514%21 Jul
nuke13–50.0129%21 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0220%21 Jul
anubis16–120.1414%21 Jul
cache6–130.0226%21 Jul
dust216–130.0116%21 Jul
mirage15–150.0926%20 Jul
inferno13–5-0.0040%20 Jul
ancient13–6-0.0619%20 Jul
anubis9–130.0014%20 Jul
cache13–50.0418%20 Jul
mirage13–60.1121%20 Jul
mirage11–130.0133%17 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0222%15 Jul
nuke11–130.0525%14 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0116%14 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0620%13 Jul
cache13–110.0029%12 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0511%12 Jul
cache13–70.0131%12 Jul
inferno8–130.0225%12 Jul
cache11–13-0.0421%12 Jul
mirage13–30.0623%12 Jul
inferno13–80.0621%12 Jul
cache13–110.0421%11 Jul
mirage13–60.0522%11 Jul
inferno2–13-0.0425%10 Jul
cache11–13-0.0425%10 Jul
mirage9–130.0823%10 Jul
mirage10–130.0221%10 Jul
cache10–130.0921%8 Jul
cache11–130.0734%6 Jul
alpine7–20.0033%6 Jul
warden9–13-0.0520%6 Jul
nuke13–30.0328%6 Jul
inferno13–10.0226%6 Jul
overpass12–16-0.019%6 Jul
nuke7–130.025%4 Jul
nuke9–130.0126%4 Jul
mirage13–100.0114%4 Jul
mirage6–13-0.045%3 Jul
mirage9–130.0024%3 Jul
nuke13–60.0522%3 Jul
inferno13–70.049%3 Jul
ancient13–80.0516%3 Jul
dust215–15-0.0319%30 Jun
dust214–160.0115%29 Jun
cache13–8-0.0126%28 Jun
inferno13–70.1317%28 Jun
overpass7–130.0618%28 Jun
anubis7–1-0.0320%28 Jun
inferno4–130.0520%28 Jun
ancient9–130.1123%27 Jun
ancient13–40.1027%27 Jun
inferno13–90.0210%27 Jun
ancient13–7-0.0110%26 Jun
inferno13–100.0314%25 Jun
dust27–130.0124%24 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0122%24 Jun
anubis1–13-0.0525%24 Jun
alpine9–130.0725%22 Jun
inferno13–11-0.0029%22 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0119%22 Jun
dust29–130.0621%22 Jun
anubis10–130.0115%21 Jun
mirage13–60.0917%21 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →