Knäcke

Knäcke — CS2 Stats

DE76561198121989572[U:1:161723844]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,840Tracked matches83%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.4 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating28,588Top 1% of 204,219 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#1670 of 251363 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,619 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 11 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 28,588 +1,869 3 Sept – 11 Oct · 14 days played
26,28328,850peak 28,8503 Sept11 Oct
Faceit ELO: 2,619 +0 28 Aug – 14 Sept · 4 observations
2,6192,619peak 2,61928 Aug14 Sept
28,986Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,619Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
32Days played since 2026-08-07

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,619
  • Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 — 381 to go
  • Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 262 below peak (28,850)
  • +1,869 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 1,412 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKnäckeFACEITLevel 10 · 2,619 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER28,588 · Red bandPEAK ELO2,619csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning56
Utility82

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT67–27–6Last 10067%Win rateTLWWWWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −2.3pp headshot accuracy · −26ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–1–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 508ms

Last 10

  • 8–1–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 522ms

Last 20

  • 15–4–1 · 75% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 535ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.6 against its own average).

Aim7.9
Utility8.2
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch2.6

Strong CT-side openerHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Utility. Utility score of 82 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 22% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning5.6
Utility8.2
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.4/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time520ms+14ms
first ⅓ avg 506ms → last ⅓ avg 520ms
Headshot accuracy17.8%−1.6%
first ⅓ avg 19.4% → last ⅓ avg 17.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–8 · ancient, 28 Sept →
43%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · ancient, 16 Sept →
234msFastest reaction time · 2–0 · anubis, 9 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 24 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

12Longest win streak
10–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 87% over 15mirageWeakest map · 44% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientS2316–770%-0.00
anubisS1711–665%-0.00
cacheS1513–287%0.01
infernoB137–654%0.00
dust2A117–464%-0.00
nukeS96–367%0.01
mirageC94–544%-0.01
train—11–0100%0.06
boulder—11–0100%0.08
overpass—11–0100%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 9). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

875Matches
54%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
76.6ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient25956%1.0815.5
Anubis20160%1.1715.1
Inferno15750%1.0714.4
Dust28146%0.9013.4
Nuke7246%1.0014.9
Overpass4766%1.0914.8
Mirage1656%1.2114.8
Vertigo1250%1.1218.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.8%Headshot accuracy
33.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.1%Spray accuracy
84.6%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
535msReaction time
22.3%T opening success
46.8%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
16.8%Flash assists
7.65HE damage / grenade
15.37Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 22.2985% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient15–15-0.0714%11 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.065%11 Oct →
dust213–30.0230%11 Oct →
anubis13–80.0812%10 Oct →
ancient13–7-0.0418%10 Oct →
cache13–60.0213%10 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.019%10 Oct →
ancient13–5-0.0514%10 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0420%10 Oct →
cache13–9-0.0426%10 Oct →
anubis13–20.0418%10 Oct →
dust213–60.0521%10 Oct →
cache13–2-0.037%10 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0217%10 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.0211%10 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0121%10 Oct →
mirage13–5-0.0516%10 Oct →
cache13–40.0826%10 Oct →
cache13–40.0326%10 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0221%10 Oct →
dust210–13-0.049%9 Oct →
cache13–110.0518%9 Oct →
dust213–20.0529%9 Oct →
ancient13–20.0628%9 Oct →
anubis13–7-0.0317%9 Oct →
mirage13–4-0.0319%9 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.0316%9 Oct →
mirage13–10.0826%9 Oct →
ancient13–30.0323%9 Oct →
nuke13–30.0414%9 Oct →
anubis2–00.000%9 Oct →
ancient13–10.0727%9 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0714%6 Oct →
nuke13–6-0.0326%6 Oct →
train13–80.0623%6 Oct →
inferno13–4-0.025%6 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.009%3 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0112%2 Oct →
ancient13–40.0015%2 Oct →
anubis0–3-0.100%2 Oct →
dust213–10-0.019%2 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0618%29 Sept →
ancient13–80.0310%29 Sept →
nuke4–130.0424%28 Sept →
dust21–130.030%28 Sept →
anubis11–130.0617%28 Sept →
ancient13–80.1010%28 Sept →
inferno11–130.0315%28 Sept →
cache13–80.0024%28 Sept →
inferno15–15-0.0121%27 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.0538%26 Sept →
cache13–50.0718%26 Sept →
dust213–5-0.0321%26 Sept →
nuke13–60.0523%26 Sept →
cache0–5-0.130%26 Sept →
mirage0–5-0.0533%26 Sept →
inferno13–90.0622%26 Sept →
inferno13–60.0125%25 Sept →
dust213–60.0518%25 Sept →
dust215–15-0.083%25 Sept →
ancient13–00.004%24 Sept →
anubis13–70.0611%24 Sept →
mirage7–130.0425%23 Sept →
anubis5–130.0018%23 Sept →
boulder13–60.0821%21 Sept →
cache13–50.1022%19 Sept →
cache13–50.0024%16 Sept →
ancient1–130.0343%16 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0426%15 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0626%14 Sept →
anubis13–50.0219%12 Sept →
overpass13–11-0.0521%12 Sept →
cache13–10-0.025%12 Sept →
ancient13–30.0412%9 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0318%9 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0422%5 Sept →
inferno16–140.0122%3 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.0121%3 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.0119%3 Sept →
nuke13–80.0435%3 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0512%3 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0021%2 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0416%1 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.0016%31 Aug →
cache12–12-0.0119%31 Aug →
anubis13–80.0018%31 Aug →
ancient13–110.0020%30 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.059%30 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0121%29 Aug →
anubis13–110.0110%29 Aug →
nuke13–70.0121%28 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0518%28 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.0212%27 Aug →
dust212–12-0.0221%27 Aug →
ancient12–16-0.0215%27 Aug →
nuke13–16-0.0417%27 Aug →
anubis13–110.0520%9 Aug →
inferno13–60.0414%9 Aug →
inferno12–120.0523%8 Aug →
mirage13–2-0.0326%7 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 Matches12-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.