Shades

Shades — CS2 Stats

JP76561198121632639[U:1:161366911]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,432Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.3 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating23,383Top 25% of 203,724 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#37734 of 251097 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 1,974 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 7 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,383 -2,348 9 Jun – 7 Oct · 9 days played
22,57126,028peak 26,0289 Jun7 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,974 +0 2 Sept – 7 Sept · 3 observations
1,9741,974peak 1,9742 Sept7 Sept
26,276Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,974Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
37Days played since 2026-06-09

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,974
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 27 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,645 below peak (26,028)
  • -2,234 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,617 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGShadesFACEITLevel 10 · 1,974 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER23,383 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,974csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning64
Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT56–43–1Last 10056%Win rateWWWWLLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating · +2.8pp headshot accuracy · −30ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 524ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 520ms

Last 20

  • 14–6 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 534ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim8.7
Utility6.6
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels3.5
Clutch4.0

Sharp aimerStrong T-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 48% on T to 33% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning6.4
Utility6.6
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact9.4

Composite 7.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time538ms−43ms
first ⅓ avg 581ms → last ⅓ avg 538ms
Headshot accuracy17.7%−3.0%
first ⅓ avg 20.7% → last ⅓ avg 17.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–7 · anubis, 25 Sept →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · inferno, 22 Jul →
430msFastest reaction time · 1–13 · anubis, 16 Jul →
13–2Biggest win · anubis, 3 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
W4Current streak
11–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 83% over 6mirageWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisA2012–860%0.04
ancientB2010–1050%0.02
dust2B147–750%0.02
infernoB147–750%0.01
cacheS1310–377%0.01
mirageD93–633%-0.01
nukeS65–183%0.02
overpass—20–20%-0.01
office—11–0100%-0.03
boulder—11–0100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,556Matches
51%Win rate
1.28Avg K/D
84.3ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno18952%1.2718.2
Ancient16658%1.2917.8
Anubis14754%1.3717.8
Dust212440%1.1716.6
Overpass6162%1.3517.7
Vertigo3658%1.3318.9
Mirage3342%1.1218.6
Nuke3339%1.1418.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.7%Headshot accuracy
40.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.3%Spray accuracy
81.8%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
537msReaction time
48.5%T opening success
33.2%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
10.5%Flash assists
11.88HE damage / grenade
9.06Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 33.1961% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–60.0417%8 Oct →
cache13–70.0624%7 Oct →
anubis13–20.0715%3 Oct →
ancient13–100.0226%1 Oct →
dust217–190.0514%30 Sept →
cache5–130.1024%25 Sept →
anubis13–70.1617%25 Sept →
anubis13–110.0412%4 Sept →
cache22–180.0622%2 Sept →
dust210–130.0723%2 Sept →
dust213–100.027%7 Aug →
anubis13–16-0.0212%7 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0314%2 Aug →
inferno8–130.0020%2 Aug →
ancient13–60.0315%2 Aug →
ancient13–40.0310%2 Aug →
dust213–40.0333%1 Aug →
nuke13–60.0416%31 Jul →
office13–8-0.0315%31 Jul →
boulder13–50.0524%31 Jul →
ancient2–13-0.0423%31 Jul →
inferno13–60.0623%31 Jul →
anubis6–130.0223%30 Jul →
inferno5–13-0.0413%30 Jul →
cache13–11-0.079%30 Jul →
anubis8–130.0118%29 Jul →
ancient4–13-0.0928%29 Jul →
inferno13–100.0114%29 Jul →
mirage13–110.0117%29 Jul →
mirage7–3-0.015%29 Jul →
dust213–100.0116%27 Jul →
ancient13–20.0227%27 Jul →
cache13–80.029%23 Jul →
cache13–110.0524%23 Jul →
nuke13–70.0120%23 Jul →
inferno13–80.0124%23 Jul →
dust26–130.0128%22 Jul →
inferno13–80.0650%22 Jul →
ancient13–30.0931%22 Jul →
anubis13–60.0821%22 Jul →
ancient13–6-0.036%22 Jul →
anubis16–140.0218%22 Jul →
ancient13–50.1122%19 Jul →
inferno11–13-0.0012%19 Jul →
anubis16–190.0319%19 Jul →
anubis11–130.0823%18 Jul →
mirage8–130.0120%18 Jul →
dust210–130.0329%18 Jul →
anubis13–10-0.0327%18 Jul →
ancient7–130.0520%16 Jul →
dust213–90.0029%16 Jul →
anubis1–130.0215%16 Jul →
ancient10–130.0320%16 Jul →
ancient7–130.0112%15 Jul →
dust213–40.0225%14 Jul →
ancient13–40.0124%14 Jul →
cache13–100.0016%14 Jul →
cache13–9-0.0317%14 Jul →
nuke13–70.0217%14 Jul →
mirage15–15-0.0213%14 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.0120%14 Jul →
cache8–13-0.0114%13 Jul →
anubis13–20.0022%13 Jul →
ancient10–130.0223%13 Jul →
cache13–50.0321%6 Jul →
inferno11–130.0715%3 Jul →
ancient7–130.0531%3 Jul →
inferno13–110.0125%3 Jul →
dust22–13-0.029%3 Jul →
nuke13–10-0.0121%2 Jul →
ancient5–13-0.0110%2 Jul →
dust213–110.0722%1 Jul →
anubis8–13-0.0116%30 Jun →
cache13–8-0.0445%27 Jun →
inferno19–170.0422%27 Jun →
anubis13–90.069%27 Jun →
mirage9–13-0.0741%27 Jun →
cache4–13-0.0311%26 Jun →
inferno14–160.0315%26 Jun →
cache13–11-0.0120%26 Jun →
mirage7–13-0.0221%26 Jun →
anubis13–70.0215%26 Jun →
mirage13–160.0623%23 Jun →
anubis2–13-0.0137%23 Jun →
overpass8–130.0220%23 Jun →
inferno9–13-0.0012%23 Jun →
nuke13–5-0.0123%22 Jun →
anubis13–110.0423%22 Jun →
ancient11–130.0219%22 Jun →
mirage10–13-0.0117%16 Jun →
inferno8–13-0.0246%16 Jun →
mirage13–10-0.0118%15 Jun →
overpass10–13-0.0319%15 Jun →
ancient13–80.0318%12 Jun →
ancient13–4-0.029%12 Jun →
inferno13–11-0.0321%12 Jun →
dust213–50.0923%11 Jun →
nuke3–130.0526%11 Jun →
anubis13–70.0826%11 Jun →
dust210–13-0.023%9 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.