ReallyRitzy — CS2 Stats

76561198121623151[U:1:161357423]✓ No bans

499Tracked matches54%Win rate2022Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating16,396Purple band · top ~22.8% of ranked players (population est.)

FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim65

Positioning56

Utility34

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT52–45–3Last 10052%Win rateLWWLWWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.5

Aggression6.8

Utility3.4

Positioning5.6

Opening Duels2.5

Clutch2.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 622ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5

Positioning5.6

Utility3.4

Mechanics6.4

Opening Duels2.5

Win Impact6.2

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02

first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02

Reaction time608ms−33ms

first ⅓ avg 642ms → last ⅓ avg 608ms

Headshot accuracy19.4%+1.6%

first ⅓ avg 17.9% → last ⅓ avg 19.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — cache 13–4

13–0Biggest win — cache

7Longest win streak

8–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

14Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 60% over 10nukeWeakest map · 30% over 10

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	25	12–13	48%	-0.02
ancient	A	22	13–9	59%	-0.01
cache	A	16	9–7	56%	-0.01
dust2	B	15	8–7	53%	-0.03
nuke	D	10	3–7	30%	-0.03
inferno	A	10	6–4	60%	0.01
overpass	—	2	1–1	50%	0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

25Matches

72%Win rate

0.87Avg K/D

68.7ADR

48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win

12%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Ancient	5	100%	0.97	13.0
Dust2	4	75%	0.61	10.8
Mirage	2	50%	0.86	14.0
Cache	1	100%	0.67	2.0
Nuke	1	0%	0.83	15.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.9%Headshot accuracy

32.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

32.0%Spray accuracy

78.6%Counter-strafing

8.6°Preaim

622msReaction time

33.4%T opening success

46.7%CT opening success

0.39Enemies flashed / flash

2.0%Flash assists

6.08HE damage / grenade

4.39Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.3892 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 33.3646% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
nuke	7–13	0.01	28%	24 Aug →
ancient	13–7	-0.04	37%	24 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.04	19%	24 Aug →
ancient	2–13	-0.02	17%	24 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.00	21%	21 Aug →
ancient	13–9	-0.04	20%	20 Aug →
ancient	13–3	0.02	17%	20 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.01	22%	18 Aug →
cache	11–0	-0.03	17%	18 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.01	16%	17 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.01	22%	14 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.06	13%	13 Aug →
cache	4–13	-0.07	7%	12 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.00	11%	11 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.04	23%	8 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.06	20%	8 Aug →
mirage	12–16	-0.02	26%	6 Aug →
inferno	5–13	0.03	21%	6 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.03	22%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.04	24%	4 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.05	15%	3 Aug →
cache	15–15	-0.03	28%	2 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.07	13%	2 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.01	25%	2 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.04	37%	2 Aug →
cache	15–15	-0.05	22%	30 Jul →
inferno	13–3	-0.03	8%	30 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.09	7%	30 Jul →
mirage	14–16	-0.01	15%	29 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.04	19%	28 Jul →
inferno	10–13	-0.04	14%	28 Jul →
cache	13–0	0.03	7%	28 Jul →
cache	16–13	-0.02	29%	28 Jul →
dust2	9–5	-0.05	15%	27 Jul →
ancient	5–13	0.02	26%	27 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.02	63%	27 Jul →
ancient	16–14	-0.05	24%	26 Jul →
nuke	8–13	-0.02	23%	26 Jul →
cache	5–13	0.03	26%	26 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.03	32%	26 Jul →
ancient	13–4	0.00	11%	26 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.06	15%	24 Jul →
nuke	8–13	-0.07	8%	24 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.02	10%	24 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.06	13%	23 Jul →
dust2	16–13	-0.02	23%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.07	37%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.02	30%	21 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.01	25%	21 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	18%	21 Jul →
ancient	4–13	-0.07	6%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.01	11%	21 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.02	20%	20 Jul →
ancient	14–16	0.05	20%	19 Jul →
nuke	8–13	-0.07	25%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–2	-0.01	29%	19 Jul →
cache	15–15	-0.06	17%	19 Jul →
inferno	10–13	0.01	19%	19 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.03	15%	19 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.02	12%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–8	-0.04	24%	18 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.11	22%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–16	-0.06	11%	18 Jul →
nuke	13–11	-0.04	8%	18 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.09	29%	18 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.05	25%	18 Jul →
nuke	5–13	-0.04	28%	18 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.05	19%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.01	19%	17 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.02	19%	17 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.04	23%	17 Jul →
ancient	16–12	-0.00	21%	17 Jul →
nuke	6–13	-0.04	16%	17 Jul →
ancient	7–13	-0.01	13%	16 Jul →
mirage	13–8	-0.04	29%	15 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.02	22%	14 Jul →
ancient	2–9	-0.08	9%	11 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.05	14%	10 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.00	15%	10 Jul →
mirage	2–13	-0.07	6%	10 Jul →
mirage	16–14	-0.03	10%	10 Jul →
cache	13–7	-0.02	16%	10 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.02	36%	9 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.01	31%	8 Jul →
ancient	13–4	0.08	15%	2 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.06	29%	2 Jul →
ancient	14–16	0.01	14%	24 Jun →
nuke	13–10	0.01	15%	23 Jun →
mirage	13–11	0.01	23%	23 Jun →
overpass	5–13	0.02	26%	19 Jun →
inferno	13–0	0.03	28%	19 Jun →
mirage	13–7	-0.03	6%	19 Jun →
inferno	13–10	-0.05	11%	18 Jun →
ancient	13–10	0.01	12%	18 Jun →
inferno	8–13	-0.06	13%	17 Jun →
inferno	13–9	0.06	15%	17 Jun →
inferno	13–3	0.10	19%	17 Jun →
mirage	13–16	-0.03	11%	17 Jun →
ancient	13–10	0.01	20%	16 Jun →
overpass	13–4	0.03	14%	16 Jun →