skipps

skipps — CS2 Stats

US76561198120627148[U:1:160361420]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,441Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,650Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidPassive Rifler
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,689 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGskippsFACEITLevel 8 · 1,689 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning43
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54397Last 10054%Win rateWLWLWWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.2
Aggression4.2
Utility6.3
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels0.5
Clutch1.6

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.77 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 589ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning4.3
Utility6.3
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels0.6
Win Impact8.3

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time589ms−41ms
first ⅓ avg 631ms → last ⅓ avg 589ms
Headshot accuracy22.4%+0.1%
first ⅓ avg 22.3% → last ⅓ avg 22.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — mirage 13–9
130Biggest win — mirage
5Longest win streak
105In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
19Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 80% over 5infernoWeakest map · 38% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA31181358%-0.00
dust2B21111052%0.02
ancientB179853%0.02
infernoC1661038%0.00
cacheS54180%0.06
overpass41325%-0.01
anubis43175%0.01
nuke220100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

109,477Lifetime kills
1.07K/D · Top 50% of tracked players
5,206Matches
47.4%Match win rate · Top 50% of tracked players
47.0%Headshot % · Top 50% of tracked players
17.1%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of tracked players
14,651MVPs
2,650Hours (in match)
4,387Bombs planted
1,519Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4732,755
AWP13,210
P2504,332
Knife2,150
SSG 082,065

Lifetime map wins

10,952inferno
7,804dust2
2,278nuke
1,956train
1,557vertigo
1,336cbble
255office
107lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

185Matches
54%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
82.1ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

28%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust22255%1.0317.4
Mirage1560%0.9113.9
Anubis1118%0.7915.2
Inferno944%1.1914.4
Vertigo862%1.2119.3
Ancient757%1.0213.9
Nuke633%1.0314.0
Overpass367%1.1419.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.7%Headshot accuracy
31.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.5%Spray accuracy
79.5%Counter-strafing
8.4°Preaim
589msReaction time
35.1%T opening success
29.1%CT opening success
0.77Enemies flashed / flash
3.7%Flash assists
11.48HE damage / grenade
6.25Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.1478% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–90.0717%31 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0424%26 Jun
ancient13–10.0632%21 Jun
overpass7–130.0233%2 Jun
dust213–90.1126%11 May
cache13–9-0.0211%7 May
cache13–50.0525%7 May
cache8–130.1025%7 May
dust213–160.0321%2 May
cache13–40.0830%29 Apr
cache13–40.1030%29 Apr
inferno13–110.0420%19 Apr
dust27–13-0.0015%19 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0610%5 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0626%5 Apr
ancient7–13-0.0415%5 Apr
mirage13–90.1217%4 Apr
dust25–13-0.0227%27 Mar
overpass16–13-0.0222%26 Mar
mirage13–100.0225%26 Mar
ancient13–80.0632%25 Mar
inferno6–13-0.0418%25 Mar
dust213–10-0.0021%25 Mar
dust23–13-0.086%21 Mar
ancient13–100.0227%21 Mar
mirage13–40.0530%21 Mar
inferno2–13-0.0340%21 Mar
inferno13–11-0.0131%19 Mar
dust213–7-0.0417%19 Mar
mirage13–7-0.0316%19 Mar
dust210–130.0317%18 Mar
mirage16–14-0.0215%18 Mar
anubis13–11-0.0219%17 Mar
mirage16–14-0.0123%17 Mar
ancient8–130.0121%17 Mar
dust210–130.0116%16 Mar
ancient16–12-0.0128%16 Mar
ancient13–50.0627%16 Mar
ancient13–90.0431%16 Mar
anubis13–30.0228%15 Mar
inferno2–13-0.0917%15 Mar
ancient11–130.0433%15 Mar
ancient15–15-0.0329%14 Mar
inferno13–100.0524%14 Mar
ancient5–130.0017%14 Mar
mirage13–6-0.0222%13 Mar
ancient9–13-0.0034%13 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0113%13 Mar
inferno16–13-0.0219%13 Mar
mirage13–60.0013%13 Mar
mirage13–10-0.0019%12 Mar
dust213–11-0.0023%12 Mar
mirage13–9-0.0517%12 Mar
anubis11–13-0.0215%12 Mar
anubis13–50.0830%12 Mar
overpass14–16-0.0421%12 Mar
mirage11–130.0516%12 Mar
ancient15–15-0.0125%11 Mar
dust28–130.0517%11 Mar
mirage13–40.0018%11 Mar
dust215–150.0529%10 Mar
inferno13–80.0631%10 Mar
mirage13–00.0247%10 Mar
overpass5–13-0.0229%10 Mar
mirage12–160.0334%9 Mar
mirage8–130.0130%9 Mar
inferno8–13-0.0118%8 Mar
ancient13–100.1020%8 Mar
mirage16–13-0.0420%8 Mar
mirage11–13-0.0525%7 Mar
mirage5–13-0.0430%7 Mar
dust213–11-0.0320%3 Mar
mirage15–15-0.0211%3 Mar
nuke13–2-0.0520%3 Mar
inferno12–16-0.0131%3 Mar
dust213–5-0.0230%3 Mar
mirage13–70.0411%3 Mar
ancient13–40.0226%2 Mar
mirage13–60.1016%2 Mar
dust215–15-0.0123%2 Mar
inferno7–13-0.0021%2 Mar
mirage13–6-0.0519%2 Mar
mirage3–13-0.1319%2 Mar
nuke13–80.0419%1 Mar
inferno5–13-0.0619%1 Mar
ancient13–50.0129%1 Mar
inferno15–150.0616%1 Mar
dust213–110.0735%1 Mar
dust213–100.0819%1 Mar
inferno13–100.0611%1 Mar
dust213–100.0427%1 Mar
inferno10–130.0833%27 Feb
mirage13–110.0520%27 Feb
dust22–130.0125%27 Feb
mirage7–130.0514%25 Feb
inferno15–15-0.0130%25 Feb
mirage5–13-0.0031%25 Feb
mirage16–130.0226%24 Feb
dust216–140.0117%24 Feb
ancient10–13-0.0719%24 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →