Emopi — CS2 Stats

76561198120581299[U:1:160315571]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,483Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.1 Developing

FaceitLevel 7 · 1,515 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim52

Positioning51

Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–44–2Last 10054%Win rateLLWWWLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.2

Aggression4.8

Utility5.4

Positioning5.1

Opening Duels2.2

Clutch4.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.81 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 627ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.2

Positioning5.1

Utility5.4

Mechanics6.4

Opening Duels2.2

Win Impact8.3

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.03

first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.00

Reaction time631ms−41ms

first ⅓ avg 672ms → last ⅓ avg 631ms

Headshot accuracy17.7%+0.5%

first ⅓ avg 17.2% → last ⅓ avg 17.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — dust2 3–6

13–1Biggest win — vertigo

5Longest win streak

L2Current streak

9–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

10Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 85% over 20mirageWeakest map · 26% over 23

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	B	30	16–14	53%	-0.02
mirage	D	23	6–17	26%	-0.01
vertigo	S	20	17–3	85%	-0.00
ancient	S	10	8–2	80%	-0.01
anubis	C	7	3–4	43%	-0.04
inferno	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.03
nuke	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.06
cache	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.02
warden	—	2	1–1	50%	0.04
overpass	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.05
alpine	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (26% over 23). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,115Matches

52%Win rate

0.81Avg K/D

62.9ADR

39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win

14%1v2 clutch win

7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	115	53%	0.82	13.4
Anubis	49	53%	0.81	13.1
Ancient	46	50%	0.72	10.9
Dust2	40	42%	0.68	11.8
Inferno	10	80%	0.72	11.1
Vertigo	5	40%	0.58	10.2
Train	4	75%	1.02	12.5
Cache	4	25%	0.55	9.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.5%Headshot accuracy

31.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

36.0%Spray accuracy

78.8%Counter-strafing

11.3°Preaim

627msReaction time

30.5%T opening success

47.5%CT opening success

0.81Enemies flashed / flash

8.2%Flash assists

11.81HE damage / grenade

4.65Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 30.4529% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

26% win rate across 23 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	6–13	0.00	25%	17 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.05	13%	17 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.01	21%	17 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.04	31%	11 Aug →
vertigo	13–11	0.04	20%	9 Aug →
mirage	17–19	0.00	8%	9 Aug →
dust2	19–15	0.01	6%	9 Aug →
dust2	17–19	-0.01	8%	9 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.04	8%	9 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.06	26%	8 Aug →
anubis	13–9	-0.05	18%	8 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.00	9%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.03	17%	7 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.04	17%	7 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.03	19%	7 Aug →
dust2	19–16	-0.04	16%	7 Aug →
vertigo	13–8	-0.04	14%	3 Aug →
vertigo	13–5	0.08	29%	3 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.06	14%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.02	17%	26 Jul →
dust2	3–6	0.19	14%	26 Jul →
ancient	13–9	-0.01	12%	24 Jul →
dust2	16–13	-0.02	23%	24 Jul →
mirage	16–13	0.02	8%	10 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.04	16%	10 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.04	14%	10 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.03	28%	10 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.07	21%	8 Jul →
anubis	9–13	-0.01	26%	8 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.09	16%	3 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.01	28%	3 Jul →
vertigo	13–3	-0.00	31%	30 Jun →
vertigo	13–10	0.03	13%	30 Jun →
vertigo	8–13	-0.00	20%	30 Jun →
vertigo	13–7	-0.04	16%	29 Jun →
vertigo	13–1	0.04	17%	29 Jun →
vertigo	13–4	0.06	21%	29 Jun →
inferno	15–15	-0.02	21%	27 Jun →
nuke	2–13	-0.05	17%	27 Jun →
mirage	12–12	0.03	11%	27 Jun →
vertigo	8–13	-0.10	10%	23 Jun →
vertigo	13–3	0.00	28%	23 Jun →
dust2	13–10	0.04	7%	10 Jun →
mirage	11–13	0.04	13%	10 Jun →
dust2	1–13	-0.05	8%	10 Jun →
dust2	13–10	-0.01	24%	9 Jun →
cache	13–8	-0.04	30%	9 Jun →
vertigo	8–0	0.09	19%	8 Jun →
vertigo	13–2	0.06	15%	8 Jun →
vertigo	13–5	-0.05	15%	8 Jun →
anubis	8–13	-0.07	25%	22 May →
cache	11–13	-0.01	27%	21 May →
nuke	13–10	-0.07	13%	21 May →
ancient	16–14	-0.06	8%	11 May →
dust2	13–9	0.01	19%	11 May →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	7%	30 Apr →
dust2	4–13	-0.03	14%	24 Apr →
mirage	7–13	0.05	15%	21 Apr →
anubis	13–6	0.00	14%	21 Apr →
dust2	13–10	-0.03	12%	17 Apr →
dust2	8–13	-0.08	14%	8 Apr →
mirage	8–13	-0.08	13%	8 Apr →
mirage	13–10	-0.01	21%	8 Apr →
anubis	9–13	-0.07	16%	1 Apr →
dust2	13–6	-0.02	13%	1 Apr →
dust2	11–13	-0.05	14%	1 Apr →
mirage	13–16	-0.09	29%	1 Apr →
overpass	7–13	-0.05	28%	28 Mar →
dust2	8–13	-0.09	22%	28 Mar →
mirage	9–13	-0.04	16%	26 Mar →
vertigo	7–13	-0.06	9%	22 Mar →
vertigo	13–5	-0.03	14%	22 Mar →
inferno	7–13	-0.04	7%	12 Mar →
dust2	12–16	-0.07	10%	12 Mar →
dust2	13–6	-0.01	17%	12 Mar →
mirage	9–13	-0.06	35%	28 Feb →
dust2	9–13	-0.00	21%	28 Feb →
mirage	9–13	-0.02	35%	27 Feb →
dust2	11–13	-0.07	10%	27 Feb →
anubis	13–11	-0.03	14%	27 Feb →
mirage	13–3	0.03	10%	27 Feb →
dust2	13–3	-0.09	18%	20 Feb →
ancient	13–6	-0.08	10%	20 Feb →
mirage	7–13	0.02	21%	20 Feb →
mirage	13–8	-0.01	24%	20 Feb →
vertigo	13–8	-0.06	9%	17 Feb →
vertigo	13–7	-0.00	16%	17 Feb →
vertigo	13–2	-0.02	8%	16 Feb →
dust2	13–5	0.05	17%	12 Feb →
mirage	9–13	-0.02	22%	12 Feb →
ancient	4–0	-0.02	17%	12 Feb →
mirage	10–13	0.01	29%	11 Feb →
dust2	13–9	-0.04	12%	29 Jan →
anubis	10–13	-0.03	28%	29 Jan →
mirage	4–13	-0.05	11%	29 Jan →
mirage	13–7	-0.03	10%	27 Jan →
alpine	13–8	-0.03	13%	26 Jan →
vertigo	13–11	-0.07	17%	26 Jan →
warden	6–13	0.02	21%	24 Jan →
warden	9–0	0.07	17%	24 Jan →