aNders

aNders — CS2 Stats

76561198119259046[U:1:158993318]Steam profile ↗1 game ban

1,306Tracked matches33%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating22,756Top 25% of 205,052 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#44683 of 252131 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,582 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,756 -841 28 Aug – 14 Oct · 18 days played
21,78225,112peak 25,11228 Aug14 Oct
Faceit ELO: 2,582 +0 28 Aug – 3 Oct · 3 observations
2,5822,582peak 2,58228 Aug3 Oct
25,112Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,582Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
30Days played since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,582
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 — 418 to go
  • Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,356 below peak (25,112)
  • -2,255 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,244 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGaNdersFACEITLevel 10 · 2,582 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER22,756 · Pink band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO2,582csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim93
Positioning66
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD51–49Last 10051%Win rateLWLLLLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −2.6pp headshot accuracy · −4ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 481ms

Last 10

  • 2–8 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 480ms

Last 20

  • 7–13 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 482ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim9.3
Utility6.3
Positioning6.6
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch3.8

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 93 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.3
Positioning6.6
Utility6.3
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact0.0

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time480ms−46ms
first ⅓ avg 526ms → last ⅓ avg 480ms
Headshot accuracy23.4%+2.9%
first ⅓ avg 20.5% → last ⅓ avg 23.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 4–12 · mirage, 9 Sept →
47%Best headshot accuracy · 4–12 · mirage, 9 Sept →
391msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · dust2, 8 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · nuke, 29 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
10–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 73% over 11infernoWeakest map · 14% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2414–1058%0.04
dust2A2011–955%0.04
infernoD142–1214%0.02
ancientA127–558%0.01
cacheC125–742%0.03
nukeS118–373%0.06
anubisB63–350%0.03
vertigo—11–0100%0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,199Matches
55%Win rate
1.49Avg K/D
87.5ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage24453%1.5018.8
Ancient12847%1.3317.6
Dust212354%1.4017.6
Inferno10255%1.4517.9
Nuke7756%1.3718.4
Anubis4441%1.2816.0
Overpass3250%1.2418.3
Cache1457%1.3418.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.2%Headshot accuracy
37.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.9%Spray accuracy
83.8%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
484msReaction time
33.4%T opening success
45.5%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
7.0%Flash assists
7.71HE damage / grenade
12.47Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.3622% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno2–3-0.080%14 Oct →
nuke13–40.1342%14 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0117%13 Oct →
dust26–130.0133%12 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.0119%12 Oct →
dust21–12-0.0718%12 Oct →
dust20–30.0214%12 Oct →
nuke11–130.0430%11 Oct →
ancient13–100.0519%11 Oct →
anubis3–13-0.0319%11 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0526%10 Oct →
mirage13–100.0724%10 Oct →
dust213–40.0719%10 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.0218%10 Oct →
anubis16–140.0129%10 Oct →
inferno9–130.1025%10 Oct →
dust213–60.1335%10 Oct →
cache8–130.0113%10 Oct →
ancient3–13-0.0220%10 Oct →
dust213–60.0125%10 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0421%10 Oct →
dust213–100.0122%10 Oct →
mirage11–130.0927%9 Oct →
inferno7–130.0525%9 Oct →
cache6–13-0.0228%9 Oct →
ancient13–40.0831%9 Oct →
inferno13–160.1333%8 Oct →
anubis9–130.0942%8 Oct →
mirage16–14-0.0231%8 Oct →
dust23–130.0010%8 Oct →
dust26–130.0625%8 Oct →
ancient13–90.0618%8 Oct →
mirage16–120.0514%8 Oct →
nuke3–130.0111%7 Oct →
inferno11–130.0317%7 Oct →
inferno13–80.0415%7 Oct →
ancient13–70.0228%7 Oct →
anubis13–80.0522%5 Oct →
ancient13–90.0220%5 Oct →
nuke13–100.0229%5 Oct →
dust213–60.1622%5 Oct →
mirage13–80.0528%5 Oct →
nuke13–40.1124%4 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0218%4 Oct →
nuke13–50.078%4 Oct →
inferno9–130.0726%4 Oct →
mirage13–100.0111%3 Oct →
cache11–130.0416%1 Oct →
dust213–100.0828%1 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0320%1 Oct →
inferno1–13-0.0811%30 Sept →
dust26–130.0618%30 Sept →
nuke13–50.0524%30 Sept →
cache13–110.0516%30 Sept →
nuke13–20.0523%29 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0039%29 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0318%28 Sept →
mirage16–190.0427%28 Sept →
inferno9–130.0726%25 Sept →
cache13–10-0.0123%25 Sept →
dust213–50.0437%25 Sept →
vertigo13–80.0917%24 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0237%24 Sept →
dust213–3-0.0222%24 Sept →
mirage10–130.0219%24 Sept →
cache5–13-0.0124%23 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0224%23 Sept →
mirage13–20.0833%23 Sept →
inferno22–20-0.0421%21 Sept →
mirage13–80.0321%21 Sept →
cache13–100.0318%19 Sept →
dust29–130.0314%19 Sept →
mirage13–50.1213%19 Sept →
dust213–6-0.0315%19 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0023%18 Sept →
mirage13–30.1020%18 Sept →
nuke11–130.0127%18 Sept →
cache10–130.0815%18 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.090%17 Sept →
dust213–160.0827%17 Sept →
mirage6–130.0122%17 Sept →
cache13–40.0832%15 Sept →
anubis6–130.0441%15 Sept →
mirage13–110.0818%11 Sept →
mirage16–140.0627%10 Sept →
ancient13–110.0627%10 Sept →
cache13–100.1016%10 Sept →
dust216–140.0622%9 Sept →
mirage4–120.1947%9 Sept →
ancient19–15-0.0519%5 Sept →
anubis13–110.0511%4 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0017%4 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0314%4 Sept →
mirage13–80.0421%4 Sept →
dust213–50.1020%4 Sept →
nuke13–70.028%3 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0111%2 Sept →
mirage13–60.0419%2 Sept →
mirage14–160.0115%2 Sept →
nuke16–140.1121%2 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.