-StinkR

-StinkR — CS2 Stats

CZ76561198118649089[U:1:158383361]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,018Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating26,810Top 25% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#738 of 11226 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GG-StinkRFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER26,810 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning51
Utility24

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54433Last 10054%Win rateLLLWWLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.8
Aggression6.9
Utility2.4
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch6.4

Sharp aimerStrong T-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 38 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 50% on T to 33% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 633ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning5.1
Utility2.4
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time638ms+1ms
first ⅓ avg 637ms → last ⅓ avg 638ms
Headshot accuracy23.1%−0.5%
first ⅓ avg 23.6% → last ⅓ avg 23.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.21Best rating — dust2 13–0
130Biggest win — dust2
6Longest win streak
L3Current streak
99In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 6infernoWeakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB35161946%0.03
dust2A34211362%0.03
cacheA127558%0.04
anubisS64267%0.02
infernoC52340%0.04
nukeC52340%0.01
ancient32167%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,166Matches
51%Win rate
1.22Avg K/D
79.7ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

52%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4457%1.3216.7
Dust23171%1.3620.0
Anubis2055%1.0416.1
Ancient1533%1.2117.1
Nuke1060%1.4317.8
Inferno714%0.8816.3
Cache667%1.3417.0
Vertigo2100%1.3021.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.7%Headshot accuracy
43.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
45.9%Spray accuracy
82.7%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
633msReaction time
50.5%T opening success
33.1%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
1.8%Flash assists
8.81HE damage / grenade
0.92Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4665 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 33.1082% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis11–13-0.0119%25 Aug
dust23–130.0328%24 Aug
inferno12–16-0.0520%23 Aug
mirage16–120.0725%22 Aug
cache13–50.0420%22 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0118%21 Aug
dust213–00.0716%18 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0429%18 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0223%17 Aug
dust213–110.0324%17 Aug
mirage8–130.0632%16 Aug
dust213–30.0221%16 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0214%16 Aug
nuke4–4-0.0317%16 Aug
dust213–110.0335%16 Aug
ancient13–5-0.0124%16 Aug
mirage13–90.0412%16 Aug
dust213–30.1028%15 Aug
ancient13–100.0115%15 Aug
cache6–130.0132%15 Aug
mirage9–130.1122%15 Aug
dust213–7-0.0133%15 Aug
dust213–30.0318%14 Aug
nuke9–13-0.029%14 Aug
dust210–130.0328%13 Aug
mirage13–70.0328%13 Aug
mirage2–60.0128%13 Aug
anubis16–130.0025%13 Aug
nuke11–130.0519%13 Aug
dust213–50.0521%12 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0227%12 Aug
dust215–150.0226%12 Aug
mirage13–40.0428%12 Aug
mirage13–80.0013%11 Aug
cache2–13-0.0130%11 Aug
inferno13–70.1227%11 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0121%11 Aug
mirage7–00.0225%11 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0219%10 Aug
dust213–80.0441%10 Aug
dust213–100.0528%9 Aug
mirage10–130.0526%9 Aug
cache13–80.0621%9 Aug
dust213–00.2133%9 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0028%9 Aug
mirage13–60.0015%9 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0219%9 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0018%9 Aug
nuke13–80.0129%8 Aug
dust213–9-0.0726%8 Aug
mirage13–70.1417%8 Aug
mirage11–130.0217%8 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0319%8 Aug
mirage13–110.0524%8 Aug
anubis16–130.0215%8 Aug
inferno13–160.0027%8 Aug
anubis13–90.0716%5 Aug
cache10–130.0812%5 Aug
dust210–130.0016%5 Aug
dust213–90.0431%5 Aug
dust27–130.0820%4 Aug
dust212–16-0.0114%4 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0020%4 Aug
dust28–130.0128%3 Aug
dust213–70.0232%2 Aug
nuke13–110.0418%2 Aug
dust213–7-0.0321%2 Aug
dust213–3-0.0225%2 Aug
cache13–30.0915%2 Aug
mirage2–8-0.0724%2 Aug
dust213–100.1327%2 Aug
inferno13–110.1333%1 Aug
mirage11–130.0625%1 Aug
anubis13–110.0612%1 Aug
cache9–130.0418%1 Aug
dust211–13-0.0035%1 Aug
dust213–40.1128%1 Aug
cache13–30.0716%1 Aug
inferno10–130.0017%1 Aug
mirage13–110.0420%1 Aug
cache13–40.0519%30 Jul
dust213–110.0122%29 Jul
dust213–80.0923%29 Jul
mirage13–110.0424%29 Jul
cache13–60.0822%29 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0212%29 Jul
dust213–160.0419%28 Jul
mirage13–10.2030%28 Jul
dust27–13-0.0419%28 Jul
dust212–12-0.0430%28 Jul
mirage10–130.0528%27 Jul
cache10–2-0.0240%26 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0218%26 Jul
mirage12–120.1124%26 Jul
dust213–20.0023%26 Jul
dust27–13-0.0134%26 Jul
mirage13–70.0528%25 Jul
dust211–130.0526%25 Jul
mirage13–60.1023%25 Jul
cache4–13-0.0221%25 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →