NaThaN™

NaThaN™ — CS2 Stats

DE76561198117751618[U:1:157485890]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

364Tracked matches62%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating15,000Purple band · top ~28.4% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (16 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 364 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,000 +4,880 30 Dec – 15 Sept · 38 days played
8,36115,121peak 15,12130 Dec15 Sept
15,121Peak Premier in tracked matches
58Days played since 2025-12-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 121 below peak (15,121)
  • +1,006 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 5,000 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-15
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-15

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNaThaN™FACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER15,000 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim47
Positioning48
Utility69

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–48–2Last 10050%Win rateLWWLLWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +1.2pp headshot accuracy · −109ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 542ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 595ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 650ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.6 against its own average).

Aim4.7
Utility6.9
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels1.3

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 65% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.84 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 40% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 655ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.7
Positioning4.8
Utility6.9
Mechanics4.5
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact9.0

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time651ms−41ms
first ⅓ avg 692ms → last ⅓ avg 651ms
Headshot accuracy18.2%+2.7%
first ⅓ avg 15.5% → last ⅓ avg 18.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.31Best match rating · 9–0 · debris, 25 Aug →
44%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · dust2, 3 Jan →
406msFastest reaction time · 9–7 · eldorado, 24 Aug →
13–2Biggest win · inferno, 23 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
7–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 73% over 22anubisWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2S2216–673%-0.00
nukeA169–756%0.02
overpassB136–746%-0.01
infernoD113–827%-0.02
mirageD93–633%-0.00
anubisD82–625%-0.01
ancientA85–363%0.00
vertigo—43–175%0.09
eldorado—21–150%-0.12
poseidon—20–20%-0.03
cache—21–150%0.02
debris—11–0100%0.31
office—10–10%0.01
golden—10–10%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

49Matches
45%Win rate
0.82Avg K/D
—ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win
—1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis1100%0.7613.0
Ancient10%0.336.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.2%Headshot accuracy
33.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.9%Spray accuracy
70.1%Counter-strafing
11.4°Preaim
655msReaction time
24.0%T opening success
40.5%CT opening success
0.84Enemies flashed / flash
7.0%Flash assists
8.51HE damage / grenade
10.63Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.9518% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
eldorado2–9-0.2333%4 Sept →
debris9–00.3125%25 Aug →
eldorado9–7-0.0122%24 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0215%30 Jun →
nuke9–13-0.0614%30 Jun →
inferno13–2-0.0619%23 Jun →
inferno8–13-0.0321%23 Jun →
ancient13–50.0325%23 Jun →
anubis13–8-0.048%23 Jun →
ancient4–13-0.0718%4 Jun →
nuke7–90.0723%24 May →
poseidon7–9-0.0312%13 May →
vertigo9–50.0218%12 May →
nuke9–1-0.0914%12 May →
mirage11–13-0.0227%1 May →
cache13–60.0524%30 Apr →
inferno1–9-0.1320%29 Apr →
vertigo9–10.2124%29 Apr →
cache3–13-0.0117%29 Apr →
overpass13–110.0210%24 Apr →
mirage13–90.0116%24 Apr →
dust213–100.0317%23 Apr →
dust213–6-0.0217%23 Apr →
ancient15–15-0.0520%23 Apr →
overpass13–11-0.022%11 Apr →
dust213–8-0.0617%11 Apr →
dust210–130.0217%11 Apr →
nuke13–70.0715%11 Apr →
ancient13–90.0712%1 Apr →
ancient13–90.0917%31 Mar →
dust213–70.0225%31 Mar →
overpass10–13-0.0620%31 Mar →
nuke16–130.0015%31 Mar →
dust213–90.0825%31 Mar →
nuke11–13-0.0617%30 Mar →
inferno6–13-0.0115%29 Mar →
inferno13–100.0623%29 Mar →
dust213–70.0516%28 Mar →
inferno6–130.0414%28 Mar →
dust213–70.0113%27 Mar →
dust213–110.0211%27 Mar →
inferno10–13-0.0812%25 Mar →
overpass11–130.0114%24 Mar →
anubis2–130.0319%24 Mar →
dust26–13-0.033%19 Mar →
nuke2–13-0.0025%17 Mar →
nuke13–70.0710%17 Mar →
ancient13–90.0514%14 Mar →
dust23–13-0.0122%13 Mar →
mirage9–13-0.0319%12 Mar →
dust27–13-0.0414%11 Mar →
nuke11–13-0.0511%11 Mar →
mirage3–13-0.0610%11 Mar →
overpass13–70.0720%10 Mar →
inferno8–130.0223%8 Mar →
ancient6–13-0.0410%5 Mar →
mirage10–13-0.0613%5 Mar →
ancient13–4-0.0513%5 Mar →
overpass13–2-0.0113%5 Mar →
mirage13–100.0723%3 Mar →
anubis11–130.0130%3 Mar →
overpass7–13-0.0416%24 Feb →
dust213–100.0224%18 Feb →
dust213–7-0.0515%18 Feb →
anubis13–8-0.0115%15 Feb →
anubis10–13-0.0115%13 Feb →
nuke8–130.0012%13 Feb →
dust213–9-0.0011%13 Feb →
anubis13–16-0.0412%11 Feb →
nuke13–100.068%7 Feb →
mirage1–90.005%4 Feb →
mirage3–13-0.0311%3 Feb →
mirage13–50.128%30 Jan →
dust216–14-0.0317%30 Jan →
poseidon4–9-0.0323%30 Jan →
overpass9–7-0.0217%30 Jan →
vertigo13–110.0717%29 Jan →
nuke9–130.0222%27 Jan →
nuke13–20.1223%27 Jan →
overpass11–13-0.0123%27 Jan →
inferno5–13-0.0312%27 Jan →
overpass9–13-0.0314%26 Jan →
inferno5–130.0110%24 Jan →
vertigo6–130.0516%20 Jan →
nuke13–30.098%17 Jan →
dust216–130.0618%16 Jan →
overpass13–100.068%12 Jan →
inferno13–4-0.0320%10 Jan →
anubis9–130.039%10 Jan →
office8–130.0117%9 Jan →
golden12–120.0512%9 Jan →
overpass8–13-0.039%9 Jan →
overpass8–13-0.046%8 Jan →
dust213–100.0519%7 Jan →
dust212–16-0.069%5 Jan →
nuke13–20.1619%5 Jan →
dust213–100.0119%4 Jan →
dust24–13-0.1244%3 Jan →
dust213–9-0.0129%30 Dec →
nuke16–13-0.0115%30 Dec →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.