SheepSheep

SheepSheep — CS2 Stats

76561198117525348[U:1:157259620]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,903Tracked matches45%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating17,507Purple band · top ~18.4% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,490 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Oct 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,507 -2,067 17 Aug – 13 Oct · 37 days played
15,88319,942peak 19,94217 Aug13 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,490 +0 30 Aug – 21 Sept · 5 observations
1,4901,490peak 1,49030 Aug21 Sept
19,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,490Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
37Days played since 2026-08-17

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,490
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 41 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,435 below peak (19,942)
  • -406 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 2,493 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSheepSheepFACEITLevel 5 · 1,490 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER17,507 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,490csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim53
Positioning67
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45–51–4Last 10045%Win rateWLLLWLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −1.9pp headshot accuracy · +52ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 519ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 533ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 507ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim5.3
Utility5.1
Positioning6.7
Opening Duels4.1
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 74% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Counter-strafing. Only 64% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.3
Positioning6.7
Utility5.1
Mechanics3.1
Opening Duels5.7
Win Impact3.3

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time516ms−19ms
first ⅓ avg 535ms → last ⅓ avg 516ms
Headshot accuracy17.7%+4.2%
first ⅓ avg 13.5% → last ⅓ avg 17.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 11–13 · mirage, 1 Oct →
38%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · anubis, 25 Sept →
375msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · inferno, 3 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 2 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
7–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 55% over 11infernoWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2210–1245%-0.00
mirageB168–850%0.01
cacheB158–753%-0.02
anubisB136–746%0.02
nukeD123–925%-0.05
ancientA116–555%0.00
infernoD61–517%-0.02
train—21–150%0.05
office—11–0100%-0.07
vertigo—11–0100%-0.09
debris—10–10%-0.12

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,048Matches
50%Win rate
0.97Avg K/D
75.0ADR
33%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient23051%1.0115.1
Dust217346%0.9715.1
Mirage16947%0.9115.0
Nuke13351%0.9514.8
Anubis11552%1.0816.2
Inferno9644%0.9414.8
Train5555%0.9514.7
Overpass5360%0.9815.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.5%Headshot accuracy
32.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.6%Spray accuracy
64.1%Counter-strafing
10.8°Preaim
509msReaction time
51.8%T opening success
53.7%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
5.8%Flash assists
5.61HE damage / grenade
7.73Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–11-0.0517%15 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0310%13 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0619%13 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0219%13 Oct →
dust213–90.046%12 Oct →
anubis8–130.0229%12 Oct →
ancient13–50.0913%12 Oct →
train13–70.0516%12 Oct →
office13–5-0.078%12 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.0317%11 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0415%11 Oct →
anubis13–80.1024%11 Oct →
mirage16–140.0325%11 Oct →
dust21–13-0.0528%11 Oct →
mirage14–16-0.0011%11 Oct →
anubis3–130.0311%11 Oct →
dust213–110.0815%11 Oct →
cache13–50.0911%11 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0112%11 Oct →
dust213–110.0123%10 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.0217%10 Oct →
inferno14–16-0.039%10 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0323%9 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0019%9 Oct →
mirage15–150.0227%9 Oct →
mirage13–90.0636%9 Oct →
dust28–13-0.047%9 Oct →
ancient13–100.0616%8 Oct →
train10–130.0635%8 Oct →
nuke3–13-0.080%8 Oct →
cache13–110.0026%8 Oct →
dust213–80.0320%8 Oct →
nuke16–14-0.0620%8 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0321%8 Oct →
dust213–70.0829%7 Oct →
mirage13–110.0733%7 Oct →
vertigo13–10-0.0911%6 Oct →
dust213–90.0011%6 Oct →
cache13–16-0.0316%6 Oct →
dust213–160.0313%6 Oct →
anubis9–130.0424%6 Oct →
mirage13–80.0629%5 Oct →
anubis13–90.0229%5 Oct →
cache10–130.0418%4 Oct →
dust23–130.0017%4 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0421%3 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.086%3 Oct →
cache4–13-0.0611%2 Oct →
inferno13–00.0126%2 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.0323%2 Oct →
ancient13–60.0415%2 Oct →
mirage11–130.1020%1 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0213%1 Oct →
cache15–15-0.0211%1 Oct →
dust213–7-0.0122%1 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0613%30 Sept →
dust210–130.0316%27 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0115%26 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0117%25 Sept →
cache13–8-0.0216%25 Sept →
ancient13–6-0.0114%25 Sept →
anubis13–5-0.0238%25 Sept →
nuke8–130.0215%25 Sept →
cache5–13-0.033%24 Sept →
nuke13–16-0.0516%23 Sept →
mirage12–16-0.0413%23 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0110%22 Sept →
mirage8–130.0220%17 Sept →
debris8–8-0.1221%16 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.025%15 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.030%15 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0616%10 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0111%10 Sept →
ancient13–90.0011%10 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0419%10 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.0817%7 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0115%7 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0423%7 Sept →
ancient13–10.049%7 Sept →
nuke3–13-0.094%7 Sept →
dust216–120.0024%7 Sept →
mirage15–15-0.018%5 Sept →
mirage13–40.0916%5 Sept →
nuke13–16-0.0213%2 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0111%2 Sept →
cache13–10-0.0514%1 Sept →
anubis13–80.0320%1 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.073%1 Sept →
nuke13–16-0.0517%31 Aug →
cache13–4-0.0417%31 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.049%30 Aug →
anubis16–130.0517%29 Aug →
anubis17–190.0112%28 Aug →
cache6–13-0.118%28 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0211%25 Aug →
cache13–80.0116%22 Aug →
dust27–13-0.047%22 Aug →
anubis1–13-0.0520%22 Aug →
anubis13–30.0920%21 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0115%17 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.