Example

Example — CS2 Stats

76561198116887316[U:1:156621588]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,617Tracked matches45%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating21,365Top 50% of 210,832 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#64705 of 257956 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,404 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Oct 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,365 -220 14 Oct – 20 Oct · 3 days played
21,36521,585peak 21,58514 Oct20 Oct
21,585Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,404Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
39Days played since 2026-06-05

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,404
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 96 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-08
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-08

Premier CS Rating

  • 220 below peak (21,585)
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,635 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGExampleFACEITLevel 10 · 2,404 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER21,365 · Pink bandPEAK ELO2,404csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning61
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–43–3Last 10054%Win rateLLWWLWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −1.8pp headshot accuracy · +64ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 514ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 530ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 498ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility4.9
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels2.0
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning6.1
Utility4.9
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels3.5
Win Impact3.3

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time525ms−31ms
first ⅓ avg 557ms → last ⅓ avg 525ms
Headshot accuracy15.3%−0.4%
first ⅓ avg 15.6% → last ⅓ avg 15.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–1 · train, 23 Sept →
30%Best headshot accuracy · 13–1 · train, 23 Sept →
367msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · office, 23 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · train, 23 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
14–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
18Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 71% over 14cacheWeakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2615–1158%0.01
mirageB178–947%-0.00
nukeS1410–471%0.00
cacheC114–736%0.02
ancientC104–640%-0.00
infernoA85–363%0.00
anubisA85–363%0.01
vertigo—31–233%0.00
office—10–10%0.01
train—11–0100%0.15
aim_japan—11–0100%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,775Matches
51%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
78.2ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust250051%1.0915.6
Mirage49546%0.9814.9
Anubis34958%1.0515.6
Ancient32049%1.0215.5
Inferno31255%1.1216.4
Nuke20347%1.0916.4
Overpass5753%1.0814.9
Vertigo5040%1.0016.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.0%Headshot accuracy
39.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.4%Spray accuracy
74.9%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
517msReaction time
48.3%T opening success
39.9%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
8.0%Flash assists
7.88HE damage / grenade
8.46Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 39.8923% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–16-0.018%27 Oct →
mirage12–160.008%27 Oct →
nuke13–110.0113%27 Oct →
mirage16–14-0.0116%21 Oct →
cache11–130.0213%20 Oct →
inferno13–110.0310%20 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0721%19 Oct →
dust211–130.0314%19 Oct →
cache13–110.026%19 Oct →
nuke13–4-0.0320%19 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0319%19 Oct →
mirage13–20.0425%18 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0320%15 Oct →
inferno16–120.0212%14 Oct →
nuke13–110.0116%14 Oct →
inferno18–22-0.0212%12 Oct →
mirage13–60.156%12 Oct →
mirage16–130.0212%10 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0114%10 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0612%10 Oct →
dust28–130.0218%9 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0520%9 Oct →
ancient11–130.0018%9 Oct →
dust29–130.0525%9 Oct →
cache9–130.0221%8 Oct →
anubis15–150.0317%8 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0319%7 Oct →
nuke13–80.029%7 Oct →
mirage11–130.0020%6 Oct →
mirage13–80.0517%6 Oct →
ancient4–130.036%6 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0218%5 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0418%4 Oct →
nuke13–80.0216%28 Sept →
mirage16–13-0.0216%26 Sept →
mirage13–80.0113%26 Sept →
cache5–13-0.0414%26 Sept →
cache13–90.0223%26 Sept →
vertigo12–16-0.0320%25 Sept →
dust213–60.0920%25 Sept →
office11–130.010%23 Sept →
train13–10.1530%23 Sept →
nuke13–80.0315%23 Sept →
cache13–110.0220%23 Sept →
mirage15–150.0219%23 Sept →
nuke14–160.0123%22 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0211%22 Sept →
cache13–6-0.0113%21 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.0316%20 Sept →
dust213–5-0.0114%20 Sept →
nuke16–120.0122%20 Sept →
mirage13–16-0.0410%20 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.0312%20 Sept →
ancient7–130.006%19 Sept →
nuke16–13-0.038%19 Sept →
anubis13–90.0321%19 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0220%19 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0225%18 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.0122%16 Sept →
anubis13–60.029%16 Sept →
nuke14–160.0115%16 Sept →
dust213–6-0.0226%16 Sept →
vertigo5–13-0.0415%10 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.058%10 Sept →
cache5–13-0.064%10 Sept →
dust213–20.0323%10 Sept →
anubis13–110.0212%9 Sept →
aim_japan13–100.0710%8 Sept →
dust212–16-0.0011%8 Sept →
anubis13–6-0.106%8 Sept →
ancient13–110.0214%6 Sept →
dust27–130.0213%5 Sept →
dust27–130.0322%3 Sept →
dust212–160.0425%3 Sept →
nuke0–13-0.0319%3 Sept →
cache6–130.0616%2 Sept →
anubis13–80.0310%2 Sept →
dust213–80.0614%2 Sept →
dust213–70.0323%1 Sept →
dust213–20.0612%1 Sept →
mirage11–130.0120%1 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0212%1 Sept →
ancient13–4-0.066%2 Jul →
dust213–7-0.0222%2 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0520%18 Jun →
vertigo13–80.0718%17 Jun →
cache8–130.0112%17 Jun →
inferno13–80.0618%7 Jun →
nuke4–130.0114%7 Jun →
inferno16–120.0125%7 Jun →
dust213–11-0.0512%7 Jun →
ancient5–130.0512%7 Jun →
cache12–120.1129%6 Jun →
anubis9–130.0314%6 Jun →
nuke13–80.0211%6 Jun →
dust213–6-0.0022%6 Jun →
ancient13–11-0.0415%6 Jun →
dust213–6-0.0110%6 Jun →
dust213–11-0.0315%6 Jun →
nuke13–11-0.0314%5 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.