[fll.fi] janzzon

[fll.fi] janzzon — CS2 Stats

76561198116229309[U:1:155963581]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

823Tracked matches43%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.8 LearningSupport
Premier CS Rating13,522Blue band · top ~36.2% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4 · 821 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 34 days played since 23 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,522 -175 23 Jul18 Sept · 30 days played
12,76615,781peak 15,78123 Jul18 Sept
15,781Peak Premier in tracked matches
821Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
34Days played since 2026-07-23

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 821
  • Next: Level 4 at 901 80 to go
  • Reached: Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-15
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-09-15

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,259 below peak (15,781)
  • -1,602 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 1,478 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-15
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-15

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG[fll.fi] janzzonFACEITLevel 4 · 821 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER13,522 · Blue bandPEAK ELO821csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim54
Positioning36
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48466Last 10048%Win rateLWLLLWWWLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +1.5pp headshot accuracy · +1ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 561ms

Last 10

  • 451 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 608ms

Last 20

  • 6122 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 607ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim5.4
Utility4.8
Positioning3.6
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch2.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 629ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.4
Positioning3.6
Utility4.8
Mechanics4.6
Opening Duels0.4
Win Impact2.6

Composite 3.8/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time624ms−52ms
first ⅓ avg 676ms → last ⅓ avg 624ms
Headshot accuracy14.4%−1.0%
first ⅓ avg 15.4% → last ⅓ avg 14.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 6–9 · inferno, 2 Aug
26%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · cache, 29 Jul
422msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · ancient, 28 Aug
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 5 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
45In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 64% over 11dust2Weakest map · 23% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA2112957%-0.01
infernoB20101050%-0.00
nukeB1991047%-0.01
dust2D1331023%-0.03
anubisA117464%-0.02
cacheA117464%-0.02
mirage4040%0.00
vertigo1010%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (23% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

151Matches
45%Win rate
0.93Avg K/D
68.4ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
15%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient3557%0.9813.9
Inferno3037%0.8411.7
Dust22756%0.9413.4
Nuke2433%0.9111.3
Mirage1926%0.9115.2
Anubis786%1.1811.3
Overpass425%0.619.5
Cache450%1.2212.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.4%Headshot accuracy
34.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.1%Spray accuracy
70.6%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
629msReaction time
20.6%T opening success
33.0%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
1.0%Flash assists
9.08HE damage / grenade
8.06Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.4402% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 20.5874% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

23% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis10–130.1020%18 Sept
ancient13–9-0.0310%18 Sept
nuke5–13-0.0722%15 Sept
dust26–13-0.078%15 Sept
ancient7–13-0.0721%9 Sept
nuke13–10-0.027%9 Sept
anubis13–5-0.0317%9 Sept
ancient13–80.0416%8 Sept
nuke10–130.0422%8 Sept
dust212–12-0.0712%8 Sept
inferno13–9-0.0525%7 Sept
ancient7–13-0.067%7 Sept
dust212–12-0.0118%6 Sept
nuke9–13-0.0311%29 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0214%29 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0610%28 Aug
nuke13–160.0014%28 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0422%28 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0214%28 Aug
ancient7–13-0.037%28 Aug
cache2–13-0.1110%27 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0913%27 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0417%26 Aug
cache13–11-0.0220%26 Aug
inferno13–70.0423%24 Aug
anubis7–13-0.069%24 Aug
nuke13–60.0210%24 Aug
dust213–8-0.0315%19 Aug
ancient13–110.0110%19 Aug
inferno13–5-0.039%19 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0318%18 Aug
ancient13–90.0117%18 Aug
nuke9–13-0.049%14 Aug
ancient7–130.0315%14 Aug
inferno16–12-0.038%13 Aug
mirage6–130.0213%13 Aug
ancient13–70.065%12 Aug
cache6–13-0.0321%12 Aug
nuke13–40.018%12 Aug
ancient13–5-0.0625%11 Aug
cache13–30.0521%11 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0322%11 Aug
nuke15–15-0.0124%11 Aug
ancient13–70.0222%9 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0120%7 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0013%7 Aug
dust21–13-0.0517%6 Aug
dust29–13-0.0312%6 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0015%6 Aug
inferno6–13-0.055%5 Aug
ancient13–10.0521%5 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0219%5 Aug
dust210–13-0.0014%5 Aug
nuke8–80.0314%5 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0111%4 Aug
cache13–9-0.0315%3 Aug
inferno9–60.1024%3 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0812%3 Aug
mirage8–130.0220%3 Aug
inferno8–80.0422%3 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0616%2 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0112%2 Aug
inferno6–90.1218%2 Aug
nuke9–50.049%2 Aug
inferno9–60.0714%2 Aug
inferno7–9-0.0716%2 Aug
cache13–7-0.0311%1 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0312%1 Aug
dust210–13-0.0610%1 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0410%1 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0412%1 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0218%1 Aug
vertigo6–90.0218%1 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0518%1 Aug
cache2–13-0.0519%31 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0216%31 Jul
cache13–6-0.0212%31 Jul
nuke13–2-0.0211%30 Jul
dust213–20.0823%30 Jul
dust212–16-0.0316%29 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0421%29 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0415%29 Jul
cache13–70.0326%29 Jul
inferno13–80.0917%28 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0110%28 Jul
ancient13–80.028%28 Jul
ancient9–130.0020%27 Jul
ancient13–90.0323%27 Jul
cache13–70.0121%27 Jul
nuke13–11-0.068%27 Jul
nuke13–80.0422%27 Jul
inferno13–60.0319%27 Jul
dust211–13-0.025%26 Jul
ancient13–80.0314%25 Jul
anubis13–100.0213%25 Jul
nuke8–130.0513%24 Jul
inferno12–16-0.0212%24 Jul
cache8–130.0012%24 Jul
dust213–7-0.0424%23 Jul
dust215–15-0.0112%23 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →